What is one reason why the ART predictability measure is important?
It identifies under-performing teams
It demonstrates the need to fix the scope at the beginning of the PI
It indicates where the Solution is ready to be released
It allows the business and other stakeholders to plan effectively
The ART predictability measure is a critical metric within the SAFe framework. It is important because it enables businesses and other stakeholders to plan effectively. This measure provides insights into how reliably teams and ARTs can deliver business value against their planned objectives. By understanding the predictability of the ART, stakeholders can make informed decisions about future investments, resource allocation, and market commitments. It is not primarily about identifying under-performing teams (A), fixing the scope at the beginning of the PI (B), or indicating when the Solution is ready to be released ©. Instead, predictability measures provide a fact-based understanding of the ART’s ability to deliver on its commitments, which is essential for effective planning and adjustment of strategies1.QUESTION NO: 91
Why is it important for the Release Train Engineer (RTE) to understand Tuckman's group dynamic
stages?
A.Tuckman helps RTEs to better understand Team and ART topologies
B.An ART is a team of teams and will likely progress through the Tuckman stages
C.The Tuckman four stages should be reflected in the design of the ART Kanban
D.The Tuckman dynamic nature of the stages requires that we assume variability and preserve options
Answer: B
Understanding Tuckman’s group dynamic stages is important for a Release Train Engineer (RTE) because an Agile Release Train (ART) is essentially a team of teams, and like any team, it is likely to progress through Tuckman’s stages of group development: forming, storming, norming, and performing1.
Here’s a detailed explanation of how each stage applies to an ART:
•Forming: In this initial stage, teams come together and start to understand their objectives and boundaries. The RTE plays a vital role in guiding the ART through this stage by helping establish the vision, mission, and objectives of the train.
•Storming: As teams begin working together, they may encounter conflicts and challenges. The RTE can help navigate these by facilitating communication and conflict resolution, ensuring that all teams are aligned and focused on the ART’s goals.
•Norming: During this stage, teams start to resolve their differences, establish processes, and begin to work more effectively together. The RTE supports this by fostering a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement.
•Performing: In the final stage, teams operate efficiently and effectively toward achieving the ART’s goals. The RTE’s role here is to ensure that this high performance is sustained and that the teams continue to innovate and improve.
By understanding these stages, the RTE can better facilitate the ART’s journey through them, helping to ensure that the teams within the ART collaborate effectively, resolve conflicts, and ultimately deliver value more predictably. This understanding also helps the RTE to anticipate the challenges that may arise at each stage and to be better prepared to support the ART in navigating them. The knowledge of Tuckman’s model equips the RTE with the insights needed to lead the ART through its developmental journey, contributing to the overall success of the train.
What is one benefit of having a well-executed Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration?
Shorter lead times before Feature delivery
Higher flow of program-level business value
Improved dependency management between teams
Occasional buffer time to deliver more predictably
The Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration in SAFe provides a regular, cadence-based opportunity for Agile Release Trains (ARTs) to focus on activities that are difficult to fit into a continuous, incremental value delivery pattern. One of the key benefits of a well-executed IP Iteration is that it serves as an estimating buffer for meeting Program Increment (PI) objectives, which enhances the predictability of PI performance1.
During the IP Iteration, teams have the chance to engage in innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt (I&A) events. This dedicated time allows for addressing uncertainties and variances that naturally occur during the PI, thus providing a buffer that helps ensure commitments are met more predictably. The IP Iteration also helps in maintaining a sustainable pace and preventing burnout by avoiding 100% utilization1.
Furthermore, the IP Iteration contributes to better predictability and flow, increased employee engagement, greater agility and resilience, and a competitive advantage for the organization1. By allowing time for innovation, such as hackathons, and dedicating time to PI events, the IP Iteration supports the ART in delivering value more predictably and efficiently1.
Which behavior exemplifies servant leadership?
Creating an environment of mutual influence
Protecting the teams and train from negative reviews
Ensuring appropriate justice is served if things go wrong
Looking out for the interests of customers and stakeholders
 The Release Train Engineer (RTE) role within the SAFe framework is designed to act as a servant leader. This is exemplified by their responsibility to listen and support teams in problem identification and decision-making, create an environment of mutual influence, understand and empathize with others, and encourage and support the personal development of each individual and the development of teams1. These actions are characteristic of servant leadership and align with the option A provided in your question.
What is this statement describing? "Agile Teams continuously adapt to new circumstanc-es and enhance the methods of value delivery."
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Delivery
Continuous Integration
Continuous Deployment
 The statement “Agile Teams continuously adapt to new circumstances and enhance the methods of value delivery†is describing Continuous Improvement. This is because the essence of continuous improvement within the SAFe framework is the constant effort to improve products, processes, and services, often through incremental and innovative improvements. This aligns with the SAFe principle of relentless improvement, which encourages a culture of ongoing, incremental improvement in the work process, driving better outcomes and value delivery1.
Which two roles should facilitate an ART sync? (Choose two.)
Epic Owner
Product Management
Product Owner
Release Train Engineer
Scrum Master
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is a servant leader and coach for the Agile Release Train (ART), who facilitates ART events and processes, and supports teams in delivering value. The RTE’s responsibilities include facilitating Program Increment (PI) planning, where they play a vital role in the success of the event, helping the ART prepare for PI planning, and facilitating the PI planning event itself1.
The Scrum Master also plays a crucial role in facilitating ART syncs. As part of their responsibilities, Scrum Masters help their Agile teams work together effectively, and they also participate in ART events, including the ART sync2. This collaboration ensures that the teams on the ART are aligned and can address any impediments or issues that may arise.
In summary, the Release Train Engineer and the Scrum Master are the two roles that should facilitate an ART sync, as they both have responsibilities that directly involve the coordination and facilitation of ART activities.
When should a Product Owner (PO) develop preliminary Iteration Goals?
After PI Planning
During PI Planning
Prior to iteration planning
During backlog refinement
Product Owners should develop preliminary Iteration Goals before the iteration planning session. Here's why:
Informed Planning:Â Preliminary Iteration Goals give teams context and direction for their iteration planning discussions, ensuring alignment with the Product Owner's vision.
Focused Collaboration:Â Pre-defined goals facilitate more effective discussions between the Product Owner and teams, helping determine what can be realistically achieved within the iteration.
What can occur as a result of not having an Innovation and Planning Iteration?
Delivery can be stifled incrementally
Bottlenecks can be hard to identify and resolve
Technical debt can grow uncontrollably
Teams can have no time for fixing bugs
 The absence of an Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration in the SAFe framework can lead to several negative outcomes, one of which is the uncontrollable growth of technical debt. The IP Iteration is designed to provide a buffer for meeting Program Increment (PI) objectives and dedicated time for innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt (I&A) events1.
Without this iteration, teams are continuously focused on feature delivery, which can lead to the neglect of necessary refactoring and maintenance activities. This intense focus on delivery can overshadow the need for innovation and addressing technical debt. As a result, technical debt can accumulate as teams push forward with new features without addressing underlying issues1.
The IP Iteration also serves as a time for teams to engage in activities that are difficult to fit into a continuous, incremental value delivery pattern, such as hackathons, where individuals can work on innovative ideas outside the usual constraints of their regular backlog and team construct. The outcomes from these activities often make their way into the Agile Release Train (ART) Backlogs, driving innovations that benefit the business1.
Moreover, dedicating time to PI events during the IP Iteration ensures that the velocity of regular iterations is not reduced, which enhances the predictability of PI performance and provides a buffer for meeting PI objectives1. Without the IP Iteration, the relentless pressure for delivery can lead to burnout, reduced employee engagement, and a lack of agility and resilience, which further contributes to the growth of technical debt1.
What is one benefit of the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration?
It allows for additional planned work
It allows for building in quality and compliance
It provides an estimating guard band
It provides an opportunity to integrate and perform end-to-end testing
One benefit of the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration is that it provides an opportunity to integrate and perform end-to-end testing. This time is allocated specifically for activities such as integration, testing, innovation, and planning, which are crucial for maintaining the quality and coherence of the solution being developed by the Agile Release Train.
Scrum Masters are effective by using scrum methods, supporting SAFe principles and practices, and what else?
Managing architectural runway
Serving as a customer proxy
Writing stories and enablers
Supporting delivery using Agile practices
According to the SAFe framework, Scrum Masters are effective not only by using Scrum methods and supporting SAFe principles and practices but also by supporting delivery using Agile practices1. This involves coaching teams in self-organization and self-management, helping them coordinate and participate in Agile Release Trains (ARTs) events, and increasing the effectiveness of SAFe across the organization. The Scrum Master’s role is to facilitate team events, assist the team in meeting their delivery goals, and work with other roles like the Release Train Engineer (RTE) to ensure a smooth process and delivery of value1.
What is the Release Train Engineer's (RTE's) role during the final plan review during PI Planning?
Verify that each team's uncommitted objectives have lower business value than the committed PI Objectives to reflect proper prioritization
Encourage discussion of each team's product Vision as part of the final plan review
Facilitate all teams when they are presenting their final plans to the entire ART
Manage the ROAMing of each team's risks
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a pivotal role during the final plan review in PI Planning. The RTE’s responsibilities include facilitating the event where all teams present their final plans to the entire Agile Release Train (ART). This involves guiding the discussions and ensuring that the presentations align with the overall objectives of the ART. The RTE does not solely verify the business value of uncommitted objectives (A) or focus only on encouraging discussions of each team’s product vision (B), although these may be part of the broader responsibilities. Managing the ROAMing of risks (D) is also part of the RTE’s role, but it is not the primary activity during the final plan review. Instead, the RTE ensures that the final plans are communicated effectively to all members of the ART, fostering transparency and alignment1.
What are the three measurement domains supporting Business Agility?
Outcomes, Competency, and Flow
PI Objectives, ART predictability measure, and KPIs
ART predictability measure, SAFe outcomes, and Competency
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), PI Objectives, and Flow
The three measurement domains that support Business Agility within the SAFe framework are Outcomes, Flow, and Competency. These domains are crucial for measuring progress toward achieving Business Agility at all levels of the SAFe implementation.
Outcomes: This domain focuses on the results that are achieved through the implementation of SAFe. It includes the benefits realized by the organization, such as increased customer satisfaction, faster time-to-market, and improved quality of products or services.
Flow: This domain measures the movement of value through the system. It looks at how quickly and efficiently work items move from concept to delivery. Key metrics in this domain include lead time, cycle time, and throughput.
Competency: This domain assesses the ability of the organization to adopt and implement SAFe principles and practices. It includes measuring the level of Lean-Agile leadership, technical agility, and team and program performance.
Together, these domains provide a comprehensive view of an organization’s journey toward Business Agility, enabling better decision-making and highlighting areas for improvement1.
What is one way to use the results from Value Stream mapping?
Focus on one component to optimize
Calculate the metrics and share them with the ART
Move from bottleneck to bottleneck, eliminating as many as possible
Identify methods for developers to code faster
Value Stream mapping is a tool used in the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) to visualize and understand the flow of value through the process of solution delivery. The results from Value Stream mapping are utilized to identify and eliminate waste, improve process efficiency, and ensure that value flows smoothly without interruptions1.
One effective way to use the results from Value Stream mapping is to move from bottleneck to bottleneck, eliminating as many as possible (Option C). This approach is aligned with Lean thinking principles, which emphasize the importance of making value flow without interruptions1. By focusing on the bottlenecks, which are the points in the process where the flow of value is impeded, teams can systematically address and remove these impediments, thereby improving the overall flow and efficiency of the value stream.
The other options, while they may be part of the broader set of activities within SAFe, do not directly describe the use of Value Stream mapping results. Focusing on one component to optimize (Option A) or identifying methods for developers to code faster (Option D) does not necessarily result from Value Stream mapping. Calculating the metrics and sharing them with the ART (Option B) is important for transparency and alignment but is not the primary way to use the results from Value Stream mapping. The key is to identify and address the bottlenecks to enhance the flow of value through the value stream.
Product Management has content authority for the Program Backlog including the Vision, the Roadmap, driving the Pl Objectives, and what else?
Establishing Features and benefit hypotheses
Managing risk, helping to ensure value delivery, and driving continuous improvement
Working with business stakeholders and Solution and System Architects to implement holistic technology across Value Streams
Within the SAFe framework, Product Management holds content authority over the Program Backlog. This includes defining the Vision, the Roadmap, driving the PI Objectives, and establishing Features and benefit hypotheses. The Program Backlog is a critical element that contains upcoming Features intended to address user needs and deliver business benefits for a single Agile Release Train (ART). It also includes enabler features necessary to build the Architectural Runway1. Product Management’s role involves identifying, refining, prioritizing, and sequencing backlog items using Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF) to ensure economic success1. While managing risk and driving continuous improvement are important aspects of the SAFe framework, they are not specifically cited as part of the content authority of Product Management for the Program Backlog1. Working with business stakeholders and Solution and System Architects to implement technology across Value Streams is also crucial, but it is a collaborative effort that extends beyond the sole authority of Product Management1.
What is the name of the event where all team members determine how much of the team's backlog they can commit to delivering during an upcoming Iteration?
Backlog refinement
Solution planning
lteration planning
Solution Demo
The event where all team members determine how much of the team’s backlog they can commit to delivering during an upcoming Iteration is known as Iteration Planning. This is a core event in the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) where teams select stories from the Team Backlog and commit to executing a set of them in the upcoming Iteration. The purpose of Iteration Planning is to organize the work and define a realistic scope for the Iteration, ensuring that the team’s capacity and the complexity, size, and dependencies of each story are considered1.
During Iteration Planning, the following activities take place:
The Product Owner (PO) typically starts the event by presenting high-priority stories from the Team Backlog and any preliminary Iteration Goals.
The team then collaborates to define, organize, and commit to the work for the next Iteration, summarizing this work as a set of committed Iteration Goals.
The Iteration Planning meeting is timeboxed to ensure focus and efficiency, and it results in a clear commitment from the team to the Iteration Goals1.
This event is distinct from Backlog Refinement, Solution Planning, and Solution Demo, which serve different purposes within the SAFe framework. Iteration Planning is specifically about the commitment to the Iteration’s delivery and is the first event of the Iteration1.
The team's draft plan review consists of which three items at the end of the first day of the Program Increment (PI) Planning event? (Choose three.)
Capacity and load estimates
(Correct)
Program delivery schedule
Draft PI Objectives
Risks and impediments
Iteration Goals
Refined team backlogs
At the end of the first day of the Program Increment (PI) Planning event, the team’s draft plan review consists of three key items:
Capacity and Load Estimates: Teams present their capacity for the upcoming PI and how much of that capacity they plan to allocate to various PI Objectives. This helps in understanding the workload and ensuring that the objectives are realistic and achievable within the given capacity1.
Draft PI Objectives: These are the tentative goals that the teams aim to achieve during the PI. They are drafted based on the team’s understanding of the work and are subject to review and adjustment. The draft PI Objectives provide a preliminary view of what the teams intend to deliver and serve as a basis for discussion and feedback1.
Risks and Impediments: Identifying potential risks and impediments early on is crucial for proactive mitigation planning. Teams discuss any foreseen challenges that might impact their ability to meet the PI Objectives. This allows for collective problem-solving and support from other teams and stakeholders1.
These components are essential for setting a realistic and achievable plan for the upcoming PI. They allow for transparency and alignment among all members of the Agile Release Train (ART), ensuring that everyone has a clear understanding of the team’s direction and can provide constructive feedback to refine the plan1.
Which core competency best describes the critical skills of Scrum, Kanban, and the Built-in Quality practices that are needed to manage the flow of value?
Lean Portfolio Management
Enterprise Solution Delivery
Agile Product Delivery
Team and Technical Agility
The core competency that best describes the critical skills of Scrum, Kanban, and the Built-in Quality practices needed to manage the flow of value is Team and Technical Agility. This competency is essential for teams to deliver high-quality solutions quickly and efficiently. It encompasses the principles and practices that teams use to organize and execute their work, including Scrum and Kanban, which are Agile methodologies for managing tasks and workflows. Additionally, Built-in Quality practices ensure that each increment of development is of high quality, reducing defects and increasing the value delivered to customers. By mastering Team and Technical Agility, teams can better manage the flow of value through continuous delivery and a commitment to technical excellence1.
What are two benefits of having a team definition of done? (Choose two.)
To measure the team's capacity to load ratio
To increase predictability
To collect team performance metrics
To improve quality
To gauge team predictability
 A team’s Definition of Done (DoD) is a critical aspect of Agile practices, ensuring that all team members have a shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete. The benefits of having a team DoD include:
To increase predictability: A clear DoD helps the team establish consistent criteria for completed work, which in turn increases the predictability of the team’s output. This predictability is essential for planning and forecasting, as it allows the team and stakeholders to have a common expectation of the work being delivered.
To improve quality: The DoD typically includes quality criteria that each increment must meet before it can be considered done. This focus on quality ensures that the work delivered meets the necessary standards, reducing the likelihood of defects and the need for rework, which contributes to the overall quality of the product1.
These benefits align with the principles of Built-In Quality within SAFe, which emphasizes the importance of quality being embedded in the workflow and outputs of Agile teams2.
Product Management is responsible for which activity?
Establishing an architectural vision for the Agile Release Release Train
Defining Program Backlog content
Prioritizing the Portfolio Backlog
Within the SAFe framework, Product Management has a pivotal role in defining the content of the Program Backlog. This involves the following key activities:
Curating and prioritizing the team backlog: Product Management is responsible for detailing and prioritizing the work items in the team backlog to ensure that the most valuable and necessary work is ready for implementation1.
Deciphering features into implementable user stories: They break down complex features into smaller, more manageable user stories that can be completed by the development teams within an iteration1.
Clarifying story specifics and ensuring that the team grasps them: Product Management works closely with the teams to ensure that there is a shared understanding of what each user story entails and what the acceptance criteria are1.
Validating stories against the Definition of Done (DoD): They ensure that the user stories meet the team’s Definition of Done, which is a shared understanding of what it means for work to be complete1.
Collaborating with stakeholders, including Product Management, to maintain a clear product vision: Product Management collaborates with various stakeholders to align the team’s work with the overall product vision and strategic goals1.
These activities are essential for maintaining a healthy Program Backlog, which is a critical component for the successful delivery of value through Agile Release Trains (ARTs) in the SAFe framework.
What hourly activity helps keep teams on track and facilitates early identification of risks during the
Team Breakout portion of PI Planning?
Iteration Review
ART planning board inspection
Coach Sync
Business Owner feedback meeting
During the Team Breakout portion of PI Planning, the hourly activity that helps keep teams on track and facilitates early identification of risks is the ART planning board inspection. This activity involves reviewing the Agile Release Train (ART) planning board, which provides a visual representation of the team’s plans and progress. It allows for the identification of dependencies and risks, and ensures that all teams are aligned with the ART’s objectives. The planning board is a central tool in SAFe for maintaining synchronization among teams and providing transparency into the work being done. It is not the Iteration Review (A), which is a separate event that occurs at the end of an iteration. Coach Sync © and Business Owner feedback meeting (D) are also important activities, but they do not specifically serve the purpose of an hourly check-in during the Team Breakout sessions to keep teams on track and identify risks early1.QUESTION NO: 82
What occurs without a shared understanding of the principles?
A.Lean-Agile mindset is achievable
B.Measures that were once beneficial become problematic
C.Practices are systematically adapted to local context
D.Business outcomes improve significantly
Answer: B
In the context of SAFe, a shared understanding of the principles is crucial for the successful implementation of the Lean-Agile mindset. Without this shared understanding, measures that were once beneficial can become problematic. This is because the principles of SAFe are designed to work together as a coherent whole. When these principles are not understood or followed collectively, the practices derived from them may not yield the intended benefits and can even lead to negative outcomes.
For example, if a team adopts the SAFe principle of decentralized decision-making without a shared understanding of the Lean-Agile mindset, they might make decisions that are not aligned with the overall goals of the organization. Similarly, if the principle of transparency is not commonly understood, teams may not communicate effectively, leading to mistrust and reduced collaboration.
A shared understanding ensures that everyone in the organization is aligned on the ‘why’ behind the practices, which helps in effectively applying them to achieve the desired business outcomes. It also enables the organization to adapt these practices systematically to their local context while still maintaining the integrity of the SAFe framework.
Therefore, it is essential for Release Train Engineers (RTEs) and other SAFe practitioners to facilitate and reinforce a shared understanding of the SAFe principles to prevent beneficial measures from becoming problematic and to ensure that the Lean-Agile mindset is effectively achieved and sustained within the organization. This alignment is key to realizing the full potential of SAFe and achieving significant business outcomes.
Which of the following roles should help facilitate an ART Sync?
Business Owner
Epic Owner
Product Owner (PO)
Product Management
The role that should help facilitate an Agile Release Train (ART) Sync is Product Management. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is primarily responsible for facilitating ART events and processes, which includes the ART Sync1. However, Product Management plays a crucial role in this process as well. They are involved in preparing for the event, ensuring that the business context and product strategy are clearly communicated, and that the teams are aligned with the priorities2. This collaboration between the RTE and Product Management ensures that the ART operates effectively and delivers value continuously.
At the end of day two of the Program Increment (PI) Planning event, the team's final plan review covers what information?
Team Features, Stories, and team-level enablers
Changes to capacity and load, final PI objectives, program risks and impediments
Changes to iteration goals, measured velocity, and dependencies
Planned Features, uncommitted objectives, and ROAMed risks
 At the end of day two of the Program Increment (PI) Planning event, the team’s final plan review covers the Planned Features, uncommitted objectives, and ROAMed risks. This is a timeboxed session where teams present their final plans, PI Objectives, and risks and impediments12. The focus is on what the teams plan to deliver (Planned Features), the objectives that they aim to achieve but are not committed (uncommitted objectives), and the risks that have been identified and categorized according to the ROAM framework (Resolved, Owned, Accepted, Mitigated)2. This session is crucial as it provides a clear picture of the team’s direction and preparedness for the upcoming Program Increment. It also allows for transparency and alignment among all members of the Agile Release Train (ART).
During PI Planning, the Release Train Engineer (RTE) sees the team's excitement decline as Product
Management changes priorities, including the top ten Features in the ART Backlog. In addition,
Product Management is asking for new estimates, timelines, and scope changes. What is the likely
reason for this behavior?
People are over-controlled and under-utilized
Cadence and synchronization are not in alignment
Management stakeholders are not involved in changing the system
Lack of training and preparation for PI Planning
The likely reason for the decline in team excitement during PI Planning, as Product Management changes priorities and asks for new estimates, timelines, and scope changes, is a lack of training and preparation for PI Planning. This situation indicates that there may have been insufficient preparation and training which is crucial for a successful PI Planning event.
In SAFe, PI Planning is a significant event that requires thorough preparation to ensure that all participants are aligned and understand the process. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a vital role in facilitating this event and ensuring that everyone, including Product Management, is prepared with the necessary content and understands the importance of maintaining established priorities and respecting the planning process12.
When there is a lack of training and preparation:
•Product Management may not fully understand the impact of introducing last-minute changes to the backlog and priorities.
•Teams may become demotivated as their planning efforts are disrupted, leading to a decline in excitement and potentially affecting the quality of the planning outcomes.
•The ART’s ability to estimate and commit to work can be compromised, leading to challenges in delivering value.
To prevent such issues, it is essential that:
•All stakeholders, including Product Management, receive adequate training on the PI Planning process and the importance of respecting established priorities1.
•The RTE ensures that there is a continuous exploration process that drives the synthesis of a Vision, a Roadmap, and Backlogs, and through Pre- and Post-PI Planning events3.
•There is a collaborative approach to planning, where changes to priorities and scope are discussed and agreed upon by all stakeholders before the PI Planning event2.
By addressing the lack of training and preparation, the RTE can help maintain the team’s excitement and ensure a more effective and aligned PI Planning process.
After an Agile Release Train's first Program Increment (PI) Planning event, what action can the Release Train Engineer take to help optimize the Program Backlog readiness for the next PI?
Ask Product Management and the System Architect what the new Program Back-log looks like just before the next Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration, so social-ization can begin
Compile all the teams' objectives from PI Planning and send out a summary report
Coach Product Management and the System Architect to include Program Backlog refinement into their cadence-based approach
Ask the Lean Portfolio Management function to hold regular Epic review meetings so new Epics will flow to the Agile Release Train
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a crucial role in facilitating the Agile Release Train (ART) events and processes, and one of their responsibilities is to ensure the readiness of the Program Backlog for the next Program Increment (PI) planning. According to the SAFe framework, the RTE should coach Product Management and the System Architect to include Program Backlog refinement into their regular cadence2. This ensures that the backlog is continuously groomed and ready for the upcoming PI planning events. The Program Backlog is a holding area for upcoming Features intended to address user needs and deliver business benefits for a single ART, and it also contains the enabler features necessary to build the Architectural Runway1. Refining the backlog is a continuous process that involves research activities and active collaboration with various stakeholders, managed through the Program Kanban system1. By coaching Product Management and the System Architect to refine the backlog as part of their regular cadence, the RTE helps maintain a steady flow of backlog items that are well-understood, prioritized, and ready for implementation, thereby optimizing the Program Backlog readiness for the next PI12.
What is a common reason why a team is unable to estimate a story?
The team does not understand the tasks related to the story
The story lacks acceptance criteria
The team has no experience in estimating
The story does not include a role
 In the context of SAFe, a user story is a short description of a small piece of desired functionality written from the user’s perspective. For a team to estimate a story effectively, it needs to have clear acceptance criteria that define the boundaries and requirements of the story. Acceptance criteria are essential for understanding what is expected to be delivered and for determining the effort required to complete the story. Without acceptance criteria, the team may struggle to understand the full scope of the story, leading to challenges in estimation. This is supported by the information found in the SAFe documentation, which emphasizes the importance of acceptance criteria in defining and understanding user stories within the framework1.
Which SAFe Principle is being applied when a Release Train Engineer treats Suppliers as partners?
Build incrementally with fast, integrated learning cycles
Assume variability; preserve options
Decentralize decision-making
Apply systems thinking
 The SAFe principle of ‘Apply systems thinking’ is the one being applied when a Release Train Engineer treats Suppliers as partners. This principle is about understanding the larger context of the work and how all parts of the system interrelate. In SAFe, suppliers are considered to be part of the solution train and are critical to the delivery of value. The framework emphasizes that for organizations to achieve mutual benefits, close collaboration and trust are required with suppliers. This involves deeply involving them in the solution’s definition and building activities, and working with them to help adopt Lean-Agile Mindsets and practices for the economic benefit of both parties1. Treating suppliers as partners is a strategic approach that aligns with systems thinking by recognizing the importance of every element in the value stream and fostering an environment of collaboration and mutual growth.
(The teams on the ART just finished the second Iteration in the PI and have nothing to demonstrate at the System Demo. What steps should be taken next?)
Stop working on any new functionality and fully integrate and test the system; adjust scope based on learnings
Require every team demonstrate their team increment to the stakeholders separately in the team branch
Re-architect the system so that there are no dependencies between the teams, and integration is not needed
Continue to work on new functionality and reserve time to fully integrate the system during the IP Iteration
Comprehensive and Detailed 250 to 250 words of Explanation From Exact Extract of SAFe 6.0, including the SAFe Release domains:
In SAFe 6.0, the System Demo is a critical event in the Release domain that provides objective evidence of progress by demonstrating fully integrated, end-to-end working solutions at least every iteration. If, after the second iteration of a PI, there is nothing to demonstrate, this indicates a serious breakdown in continuous integration, built-in quality, and flow. SAFe guidance is explicit that this situation must be addressed immediately rather than deferred.
The correct response is to stop starting new work, focus on integration and testing, and adjust scope based on what is learned. This aligns with Lean principles and the SAFe Flow Accelerators, particularly “Stop starting, start finishing†and “Make value flow without interruptions.†Continuing to add new functionality without integration increases risk, delays feedback, and undermines predictability.
SAFe emphasizes that integration should happen continuously, not at the end of the PI or during the IP Iteration. Reserving integration for later violates SAFe guidance and often results in late discovery of defects and dependencies. Separate team demos or working in isolated branches fail to provide the integrated system view required for effective stakeholder feedback. Re-architecting solely to avoid integration is unrealistic and contradicts system-level thinking.
By halting new work and focusing on integration and testing, the ART restores alignment with SAFe’s Release practices, enables meaningful System Demos, and ensures transparency, learning, and adaptive planning based on real progress.
Program Increment (PI) Objectives should be written in the SMART format. What does the "R" in SMART stand for?
Realistic
Required
Random
Rationalized
The “R†in the SMART criteria for writing Program Increment (PI) Objectives stands for “Realistic.†This means that the objectives should be set in a way that can be realistically achieved within the given time and resources. It’s important that the objectives are challenging yet attainable, as setting unrealistic goals can lead to disappointment and a lack of motivation among team members. The SMART criteria help ensure that the objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound, which is essential for the successful execution of PI objectives within the SAFe framework.
Becoming a coach requires a shift from old behaviors to new ones. What are three ex-amples of old behaviors? (Choose three.)
Focusing on deadlines
Fixing problems for the team
Driving toward specific outcomes
Asking the team for the answers
Facilitating team problem solving
Focusing on business value delivery
In the context of SAFe, becoming a coach involves a shift from traditional management behaviors to those that support and enable Agile and Lean practices. The old behaviors that a coach needs to move away from include:
Focusing on deadlines (A): Traditional management often emphasizes strict adherence to deadlines, which can lead to a focus on output rather than outcome and value.
Fixing problems for the team (B): This behavior undermines the team’s ability to self-organize and solve problems on their own, which is a key aspect of Agile teams.
Driving toward specific outcomes ©: While having goals is important, a coach should encourage teams to explore various paths to achieve outcomes, fostering innovation and adaptability rather than prescribing specific solutions.
These behaviors contrast with new behaviors expected of a SAFe coach, such as facilitating team problem-solving (E) and focusing on business value delivery (F), which align with Agile principles of empowerment and customer-centricity1.
Which of the following is true about the ART sync event?
It is run after PO-sync and Scrum of Scrum events
It is a combination of PO-sync and Scrum of Scrums events
It occurs during the Innovation and Planning iteration
Attendance by the entire ART is important
The ART Sync event is a combination of PO-sync and Scrum of Scrums events. It is used to coordinate progress across the Agile Release Train, involving Scrum Masters/Team Coaches, Product Owners, and other select team members to discuss progress, impediments, scope, and priority adjustments.
When is one time a Scrum Master may be a participant rather than a facilitator?
If the entire team is present during the daily stand-up
During team breakout sessions at Pl Planning
When using ad hoc teams for Inspect and Adapt
When the Agile Release Train does not require any team coordination
A Scrum Master may be a participant rather than a facilitator when using ad hoc teams for Inspect and Adapt. In such situations, the Scrum Master might contribute directly to the activities and discussions, leveraging their expertise and insights to aid the ad hoc team's efforts in inspecting and adapting their processes and work products.
What does transparency mean in a scrum environment?
Development and Operations teams work together
The process is visible to all stakeholders
The team is constantly improving its process
Team members must immediately share any and all feedback with each other
In a scrum environment, transparency is crucial as it allows all stakeholders to have visibility into the project’s progress and challenges. This visibility is essential for trust, timely feedback, and alignment of expectations. It ensures that everyone has a clear understanding of the work being done, which is fundamental in Agile practices. Transparency in SAFe is achieved through various means, such as making the Program Board visible during PI Planning, conducting System Demos, and summarizing Team PI Objectives into Program PI Objectives for visibility12. This approach helps in creating a shared understanding and enables informed decision-making throughout the course of the project.\
The goal of Lean is to deliver the maximum customer value in the shortest sustainable lead time while providing what else?
The highest possible quality
A Continuous Delivery Pipeline
Significant team contributions
Improved capacity allocation
The goal of Lean within the context of SAFe is to deliver the maximum customer value in the shortest sustainable lead time while maintaining the highest possible quality. This is achieved by optimizing the flow of value through the Continuous Delivery Pipeline and by ensuring that all steps in the process contribute to the creation of value. The focus on quality is integral to Lean because it ensures that the products or services delivered are not only fast and efficient but also meet the customer’s needs and expectations1234.
Which core competency describes the ability to deliver continuous value?
Organizational Agility
Lean Portfolio Management
Business Agility
Agile Product Delivery
The core competency that describes the ability to deliver continuous value in SAFe is Agile Product Delivery. This competency is focused on developing and delivering products and services that meet customer needs and provide sustainable competitive advantage. It emphasizes the importance of a customer-centric approach, developing on cadence, releasing on demand, and building in quality from the beginning. Agile Product Delivery ensures that the right solutions are delivered at the right time, enabling a flow of value to customers with speed and efficiency1.
Which statement is true about teams?
Products are more robust when individuals on teams have specific skill sets
Agile Teams can manage daily interruptions
Teams are more productive than the same number of individuals
Changes in team composition do not impact productivity
 The SAFe framework emphasizes the importance of teams over individuals in terms of productivity. According to SAFe, Agile teams are cross-functional groups that have all the skills necessary to define, build, test, and where applicable, deploy value in short, sustainable bursts of work. This cross-functionality and collaboration enable teams to be more productive and deliver value more effectively than individuals working separately. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) role within SAFe is designed to support these teams by facilitating ART events and processes, helping manage risks, and driving relentless improvement, which further enhances team productivity1.
What is the primary purpose of PO sync?
To build objectives for the Program Increment
To assess progress of the Program Increment and adjust scope and priority as needed
To align with the scrum of scrums participants on the status of the Program Increment
The PO Sync is a regularly scheduled event for Product Owners (POs) and product management (PMs) with several important purposes. One of the primary purposes is to provide visibility into how well the Agile Release Train (ART) is progressing towards its Program Increment (PI) objectives. This involves assessing any scope changes to work and adjusting scope and priority as needed. The PO Sync enables the RTE, PMs, and POs to inspect and adapt the plan for the current PI, ensuring that the ART is on track to achieve its objectives and making necessary adjustments to the Program Backlog1.
What is communicated on the ART planning board?
ART PI risks
Dependencies between teams
Team velocity
PI Objectives
The ART planning board is a key tool used during PI Planning in the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). It is utilized to visualize and communicate the critical aspects of the Program Increment (PI) planning process. According to the SAFe documentation, the ART planning board highlights the new feature delivery dates, feature dependencies among teams, and relevant milestones1. This visualization aids in the coordination and alignment of the teams within the Agile Release Train (ART).
The correct answer is B. Dependencies between teams, as the ART planning board specifically communicates the dependencies that exist between different teams working on the ART. This is crucial for ensuring that teams are aware of and can manage the interdependencies effectively, which is essential for the smooth delivery of value through the ART.
The other options, such as ART PI risks (A), team velocity ©, and PI Objectives (D), are important elements within the SAFe framework but are not the primary focus of the ART planning board. The board’s main purpose is to provide visibility into how the teams’ work interrelates and to facilitate the management of cross-team dependencies to ensure that the ART can achieve its objectives efficiently and effectively.
In systems thinking, value of a system passes through its what?
Integrations
Interactions
Interdependencies
Interconnections
 In systems thinking, a key principle is that the value of a system passes through its interconnections. This concept emphasizes the importance of the interfaces and dependencies that exist within a system. These interconnections are crucial for delivering ultimate value, and continuous attention to these interfaces and interactions is vital for the system’s evolution. It is understood that a system can evolve no faster than its slowest integration point, which highlights the significance of these interconnections in the overall system performance1.
Which primary role should emphasize lifelong learning?
Lean-Agile Leaders
Scrum Masters
Product Management
Business Owners
The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) emphasizes that Lean-Agile Leaders are the key enablers of a Lean-Agile transformation. They are the ones who must lead by example, embodying the principles and values of SAFe and promoting a culture of lifelong learning. This is crucial because these leaders are responsible for driving the adoption of SAFe practices across the organization. They are expected to be continuous learners, always seeking to improve their understanding of Lean-Agile practices and principles, and to foster an environment where everyone is encouraged to learn and grow. The Release Train Engineer (RTE) role, while also being a servant leader and coach, primarily facilitates ART events and processes, and supports teams in delivering value. However, the emphasis on lifelong learning as a primary responsibility is specifically associated with Lean-Agile Leaders within the SAFe framework1.
Which two practices are most important for the Agile Release Train to best support Re-lease on Demand? (Choose two.)
Aligning around organizational value streams
Centralized risk management
Decouple deployment from release
Change board community of practice
Continuous Integration
The Agile Release Train (ART) supports Release on Demand by ensuring that new functionality can be released to the end users at a moment’s notice, which is a critical aspect of the Continuous Delivery Pipeline. This is achieved through two key practices:
Decouple deployment from release ©: This practice allows for the deployment of new functionality into production without making it immediately visible to end users. It provides the flexibility to release features incrementally based on business needs, rather than being tied to the deployment schedule1.
Continuous Integration (E): Continuous Integration is a software development practice where developers regularly merge their code changes into a central repository, after which automated builds and tests are run. The key benefits of Continuous Integration include the ability to detect and fix integration issues early, leading to more reliable software and faster development cycles. This practice is fundamental to supporting Release on Demand because it ensures that the software is always in a releasable state, which is essential for the quick release of new features1.
These practices are part of the larger framework of SAFe, which emphasizes the importance of ARTs being able to deliver value efficiently and effectively to meet customer and business needs.
Which activity takes place during Team Breakout #2 on the second day of Program In-crement (PI) Planning?
The RTE modifies the PI Iteration schedule, if needed, based on the scope of high priority Features
Business Owners assign business value without team discussion so they can nor-malize business value across all teams on the Agile Release Train
All Feature delivery and dependencies are visualized on the program board
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) combines all Team PI Objectives into Program PI Objectives
During Team Breakout #2 on the second day of Program Increment (PI) Planning, teams continue their planning and make the necessary adjustments. This includes visualizing all Feature delivery and dependencies on the program board. The program board is a crucial tool in SAFe’s PI Planning process as it provides a visual representation of the plan, showing how Features flow through Iterations and highlighting any dependencies and risks. This visualization helps teams and stakeholders understand the delivery forecast and align on the execution plan1.
Which two behaviors are an important part of the Release Train Engineer role? (Choose two.)
Drive teams to specific outcomes
Provide answers about Features
Coach leaders to increase alignment
Encourage teams to self-organize
Manage dependencies for teams
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is a servant leader and coach for the Agile Release Train (ART). According to the information provided by the Scaled Agile Framework, two of the key behaviors of an RTE include coaching leaders to increase alignment and encouraging teams to self-organize1.
Coaching Leaders to Increase Alignment: The RTE has a responsibility to coach leaders, teams, and Scrum Masters in Lean-Agile practices and mindsets. This coaching is aimed at increasing alignment at all levels of the organization, which is essential for the success of the ART.
Encouraging Teams to Self-Organize: While the RTE facilitates ART events and processes, they also support the teams in delivering value. A fundamental aspect of this support is encouraging teams to self-organize, which is aligned with the principles of Lean and Agile that emphasize team autonomy and empowerment1.
These behaviors are crucial as they help ensure that the ART operates effectively within the SAFe framework, delivering value continuously and efficiently.
What should the Release Train Engineer do during the final plan review on Day two of Program Increment (PI) Planning?
Encourage discussion of each team's product Vision as part of the final plan re-view
Verify that each team's uncommitted objectives have lower business value than the committed PI Objectives in order to reflect proper prioritization
Facilitate the ROAMing of each team's risks
Facilitate all teams when they are presenting their final plans to the entire Agile Release Train
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a crucial role during the Program Increment (PI) Planning, particularly on Day 2 during the final plan review. The RTE’s responsibilities include:
Facilitating the PI Planning Event: The RTE is instrumental in ensuring the PI planning event runs smoothly. On Day 1, they open the event, review the agenda, and introduce speakers. On Day 2, they continue to facilitate the event, which includes the final plan review1.
Summarizing Team PI Objectives: After teams present their plans, the RTE summarizes the Team PI Objectives into Program PI Objectives and publishes them for visibility and transparency1.
Managing Risks and Dependencies: The RTE helps manage risks and dependencies, escalates and tracks impediments, and provides input on resourcing to address critical bottlenecks2.
Encouraging Collaboration: They encourage collaboration between teams and System and Solution Architects/Engineering2.
Ensuring Strategy and Execution Alignment: The RTE works with Product and Solution Management, Product Owners, and other stakeholders to help ensure strategy and execution alignment2.
During the final plan review, the RTE’s role is to facilitate the presentations of the final plans by all teams to the entire Agile Release Train. This is a critical part of the PI Planning process as it ensures alignment and transparency across all teams1.
What are two examples of team-level events? (Choose two.)
Backlog refinement
System Demo
Daily stand-up
Program Increment Planning
Backlog refinement and daily stand-up are both team-level events within the SAFe framework.
Backlog refinement is a recurring event for Agile teams where team members collaborate to clarify and understand backlog items, ensuring that the backlog remains populated with items that are ready to be pulled into upcoming iterations1.
Daily stand-up is a short, time-boxed event for the Agile team that happens at the start of each day to synchronize activities and create a plan for the next 24 hours. This meeting is an opportunity for team members to discuss what they did the day before, what they plan to do today, and any impediments they are facing1.
Both of these events are crucial for maintaining the flow of value through continuous delivery and are consistent with the principles of Lean and Agile found in the SAFe framework. They are designed to foster better communication, collaboration, and transparency among team members, which are key aspects of the SAFe core values1.
In order to evolve the role of a leader in SAFe, which practices can the Release Train En-gineer (RTE) recommend?
Provide the RTE with weekly status reports
Develop detailed project plans
Manage up and across the Enterprise
Encourage personal development
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a crucial role as a servant leader and coach within the SAFe framework. To evolve the role of a leader, the RTE can recommend practices that foster personal development. This aligns with the principles of SAFe which emphasize lifelong learning and growth. Encouraging personal development helps leaders and team members to continuously improve their skills, adapt to new challenges, and contribute effectively to the organization’s goals. This approach is supported by the SAFe principle of unlocking the intrinsic motivation of knowledge workers, which includes promoting personal and career development12.
What are two ways to ensure facility readiness when preparing for the Program Incre-ment (PI) Planning event? (Choose two.)
Secure communication channels for remote participants
Print program boards
Engage audio-visual technical support
Share business value documents
Print PI Objectives
 Ensuring facility readiness for the Program Increment (PI) Planning event involves several logistical preparations. Two key ways to ensure this readiness include:
Secure communication channels for remote participants: Given the current times and the possibility of distributed teams, it’s crucial to have reliable and secure communication channels. This ensures that all participants, whether they are attending physically or remotely, can collaborate effectively during the PI Planning event1.
Engage audio-visual technical support: Having robust audio-visual support is essential, especially when the PI Planning event includes remote participants. This support helps in managing presentations, discussions, and breakout sessions, ensuring that all attendees can see, hear, and contribute to the planning process1.
These steps are part of the broader preparation activities facilitated by the Release Train Engineer (RTE) to ensure that the PI Planning event runs smoothly and that all teams on the Agile Release Train (ART) are aligned to a shared mission and vision2.
What are two purposes of a community of practice? (Choose two.)
To approve standards
To align tasks across teams
To refine definitions of done
To share knowledge and skills
To network
Communities of Practice (CoPs) within the SAFe framework are designed to be organized groups with a common interest in a specific technical or business domain. They collaborate regularly to share information, improve their skills, and actively work on advancing their knowledge of the domain. The purposes of CoPs include fostering a culture built on professional networking, personal relationships, shared knowledge, and common skills. This aligns with the options D and E, as CoPs enable SAFe participants to exchange knowledge and skills with people across the entire organization and provide opportunities for networking1. CoPs are not primarily for approving standards or aligning tasks across teams, nor are they for refining definitions of done, which excludes options A, B, and C from being correct answers.
Which SAFe Core Competency requires exemplifying the principles and values of lean-agile?
Continuous Learning Culture
Agile Product Delivery
Organizational Agility
Lean-Agile Leadership
The Lean-Agile Leadership competency is fundamental to the success of the SAFe framework. It emphasizes that those in positions of authority must lead by example, embodying the principles and values of Lean and Agile. According to the SAFe Core Values page, leaders are expected to exemplify these values in their actions and decisions1. This competency is crucial as it inspires the adoption of Agile practices throughout the organization2. By demonstrating Lean-Agile principles, leaders create an environment that fosters an Agile way of working, thereby driving the cultural and behavioral changes necessary for a successful Lean-Agile transformation12.
Communicating the Vision to the Agile Release Train during Program Increment Planning supports which SAFe Core Value?
Transparency
Program Execution
Alignment
Communicating the Vision to the Agile Release Train (ART) during Program Increment (PI) Planning is a fundamental activity within the SAFe framework that supports the Core Value of Alignment.
Alignment is one of the four Core Values of SAFe and is essential for ensuring that all members of an organization are moving in the same direction towards a common goal. In the context of ART, the Vision provides a clear and inspiring future state that the teams on the train are working towards. It serves as a guidepost for decision-making and prioritization throughout the PI.
During PI Planning, the Vision is communicated to provide the teams with the context they need to align their work with the strategic objectives of the organization. This includes understanding the customer needs, the competitive environment, and the technological landscape. By having a shared Vision, teams can align their backlogs, architectural runway, and delivery schedules to effectively contribute to the larger goals of the organization.
The process of communicating the Vision during PI Planning typically involves the following steps:
Preparation: Before the PI Planning event, Product and Solution Management work together to refine the Vision, ensuring it is clear, achievable, and aligned with the strategic themes and portfolio direction.
Presentation: At the beginning of the PI Planning event, the Vision is presented to all members of the ART. This often includes the Business Owners, who provide the business context and highlight the importance of the Vision in achieving business outcomes.
Collaboration: Teams on the ART then collaborate to break down the Vision into Features and Enablers, which are then prioritized and planned for implementation during the PI.
Commitment: Teams commit to a set of PI Objectives that are directly linked to the Vision, ensuring that every team’s work contributes to the advancement of the shared goals.
By communicating the Vision during PI Planning, SAFe ensures that everyone on the ART understands the ‘why’ behind their work, fostering a sense of purpose and direction. This alignment is critical for the ART to operate effectively and deliver value consistently, making it a core aspect of the SAFe framework1.
Which statement is true about estimating Features using Story points?
More than one team may be involved in the estimation
T-shirt sizing is the best way to estimate features
Feature estimation is performed solely by Product Managers
According to the SAFe framework, when estimating features using story points, it is true that more than one team may be involved in the estimation process. This collaborative approach encourages teams to work together to assess the complexity and effort required to implement a feature. The estimation process is not restricted to a single team or solely to Product Managers; instead, it involves multiple teams that may contribute to the feature’s development. This aligns with the principles of SAFe, which emphasize cross-team collaboration and alignment to ensure that features are estimated accurately and that all relevant perspectives are considered1.
What foundational issue most often leads to team dysfunction?
Absence of trust
Weak Lean-Agile leadership
Fear of conflict
Lack of commitment
 The foundational issue that most often leads to team dysfunction is the absence of trust. In the context of SAFe, trust is a critical component of an effective Agile Release Train (ART). Without trust, teams may not effectively collaborate, which can lead to various dysfunctions such as fear of conflict, lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, and inattention to results.
Trust and the SAFe Framework: SAFe emphasizes the importance of trust among team members and between teams and management. Trust is essential for creating an environment where team members feel safe to take risks, communicate openly, and work towards common goals.
Impact on PI Planning: During Program Increment (PI) planning, trust enables teams to be open about challenges and dependencies, ensuring that issues are addressed and that the plan is realistic and achievable.
Role of the RTE: The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a pivotal role in fostering trust within the ART. By acting as a servant leader and coach, the RTE helps resolve conflicts, facilitates collaboration, and supports teams in delivering value.
Continuous Improvement: Trust is also vital for the relentless improvement process within SAFe. Teams that trust each other are more likely to engage in constructive dialogue and problem-solving, leading to continuous growth and improvement.
Building Trust: Trust is built through actions such as making and meeting commitments, being transparent, and creating a blame-free environment where learning from mistakes is encouraged.
In conclusion, the absence of trust is the most significant issue leading to team dysfunction, and it is addressed throughout the SAFe framework by encouraging transparency, servant leadership, and a culture of continuous learning and improvement.
An Agile Release Train (ART) is frequently discovering compatibility issues between the developed Solution and the Enterprise information architecture. What can the Release Train Engineer do to prevent this from occurring?
Develop more detailed Feature definitions
Add data Architects onto the ART
Confirm attendance of architectural representatives at Program Increment (PI) Planning
Conduct the entire data architecture design upfront
To prevent compatibility issues between the developed Solution and the Enterprise information architecture, the Release Train Engineer (RTE) can take proactive steps during the Program Increment (PI) Planning phase.
One effective approach is to ensure that architectural representatives are present at PI Planning meetings. This allows for early detection and resolution of potential compatibility issues, as these representatives can provide valuable insights into the Enterprise information architecture and how the developed Solution should align with it.
By confirming the attendance of architectural representatives, the RTE facilitates direct communication between the development teams and the architects. This collaboration is crucial for aligning the ART’s work with the broader architectural standards and requirements, thereby reducing the likelihood of encountering compatibility issues later in the development process.
This strategy aligns with the SAFe principle of fostering collaboration and alignment across various roles within the ART to ensure a smooth and efficient workflow that adheres to the organization’s technical and strategic objectives1.
Why would a Release Train Engineer use an Iteration and Program Increment Calendar?
To know the cycle time between important team and train events
To ensure that key ceremonies don't conflict with non-SAFe ceremonies
To create a BVIR of the important team and ART milestones
To visualize the Agile Release Train's cadence and synchronization
A Release Train Engineer (RTE) uses an Iteration and Program Increment (PI) Calendar to visualize the Agile Release Train’s cadence and synchronization. This calendar is a critical tool in SAFe for planning and tracking the events and milestones of a PI. It helps in aligning the team with the ART’s schedule, ensuring that all teams are working in sync and that key events such as PI Planning, Iterations, and Inspect and Adapt sessions are conducted at regular intervals. The calendar serves as a visual aid to manage the flow of value through the ART by providing a clear view of the PI timebox, which typically includes four development Iterations followed by one Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration1. By using this calendar, the RTE can facilitate a smooth and coordinated execution of the PI, which is essential for achieving the goals set out in the PI Objectives23.
When planning for a distributed Program Increment (PI) Planning event with a large dif-ference in time zones, what are two key preparation and facilitation focus areas for a Re-lease Train Engineer (RTE)? (Choose two.)
Share the outcomes of preparation meetings with local Scrum Masters so they can arrange local rooms
Have a single RTE and technical support person that acts as a central point of communication for all locations
Adjust the PI agenda to 2.5 – 3 days, allowing for overlapping hours
Split up the PI Planning event per time zone and then have the final plan review, confidence vote, and planning retrospective as one centralized meeting
Arrange and test presentation audio and video connectivity in all locations
When planning for a distributed Program Increment (PI) Planning event with a significant difference in time zones, a Release Train Engineer (RTE) should focus on adjusting the PI agenda to accommodate overlapping hours and ensuring robust audio and video connectivity across all locations.
Adjusting the PI agenda to 2.5 – 3 days allows for overlapping hours where all participants can engage synchronously, which is crucial for collaboration and alignment1. This adjustment ensures that teams across different time zones can contribute effectively without being excluded due to their local time.
Ensuring that presentation audio and video connectivity is arranged and tested in all locations is essential for a distributed PI Planning event1. This preparation is vital to avoid technical issues that could disrupt the communication and collaboration necessary for successful PI Planning. It’s important to have reliable technology and infrastructure that supports the different planning activities, including tooling to facilitate remote interaction1.
These focus areas are critical for the RTE to prepare and facilitate a distributed PI Planning event effectively, ensuring that all teams, regardless of their location, can participate fully and contribute to the planning process.
What is an anti-pattern for a Release Train Engineer facilitating a scrum of scrums meet-ing?
Run the meeting in front of the program board
Facilitate the meeting using a focused and visible agenda and timebox
Address the most important questions for Program Increment (PI) execution
Review individual team performance
 An anti-pattern for a Release Train Engineer (RTE) facilitating a scrum of scrums meeting is focusing on individual team performance. The purpose of the scrum of scrums is to enhance collaboration and alignment across teams, not to assess or review the performance of individual teams.
Purpose of Scrum of Scrums: The scrum of scrums is a coordination meeting that helps teams discuss interdependencies and progress towards achieving the Program Increment (PI) objectives. It is not a status meeting or a performance review session1.
Role of the RTE: As a servant leader, the RTE’s role is to facilitate these meetings to ensure that teams are on track to meet the PI objectives, not to evaluate team performance. The RTE should focus on removing impediments and fostering an environment where teams can collaborate effectively1.
Focus on Collaboration: The RTE should encourage teams to share information about their progress, impediments, and dependencies, rather than focusing on individual team metrics or performance. This approach promotes a collaborative and problem-solving culture1.
Anti-Patterns to Avoid: Reviewing individual team performance can lead to a lack of trust and openness, as teams may feel they are being judged or compared. This can hinder the collaborative spirit necessary for the success of the ART1.
Encouraging System Thinking: The RTE should promote system thinking, where the focus is on the overall success of the ART rather than the performance of individual teams. This helps in identifying systemic issues and working towards collective improvement1.
In conclusion, the RTE should avoid the anti-pattern of reviewing individual team performance during the scrum of scrums meeting. Instead, the RTE should facilitate a collaborative environment that focuses on the progress and impediments related to PI execution.
The team is struggling to agree on the Story point sizing of a new User Story. The Prod-uct Owner was previously a related domain expert and feels the team is wasting time. What should she do?
Instruct the Scrum Master to resize the Story
Continue to support the team's decision on sizing
Suggest the team stop the sizing of the User Story and add it to the next lteration as-is
In SAFe, story point sizing is a collaborative process that involves the entire Agile Team. The Product Owner, even with domain expertise, should respect the team’s process and support their decision on sizing. This is because the team’s estimate reflects their understanding of the work and their capacity to complete it. The Product Owner’s role is to provide clarity and answer questions about the user story, not to dictate the size of the story. This approach ensures that the team remains empowered and that estimates reflect the team’s perspective, leading to more accurate planning and tracking. It’s important to note that the Product Owner can contribute to the discussion by sharing their expertise, but the final decision on story points should be a team consensus1.
What is one activity the Release Train Engineer (RTE) performs before an upcoming PI?
Provides approval and sign-off for draft Team Backlogs
Allocates time in the Coach Sync for Product Management to socialize with the teams on the Features
Facilitate ART Backlog prioritization with Product Management and other stakeholders
Ensures at least 30% of the ART Backlog is allocated to Enabler Features
Before an upcoming Program Increment (PI), the Release Train Engineer (RTE) has several responsibilities to ensure that the Agile Release Train (ART) is prepared for the PI Planning event. One of the key activities performed by the RTE is facilitating ART Backlog prioritization with Product Management and other stakeholders1.
This activity involves working closely with Product Management to review and prioritize the features and capabilities that are proposed for the upcoming PI. The RTE helps to ensure that the ART Backlog reflects the priorities of the business and that there is alignment between the stakeholders and the teams on what will be built. This collaborative effort is crucial for the ART to effectively plan and execute the work for the PI.
The RTE’s role in facilitating ART Backlog prioritization includes:
•Engaging with Product Management: The RTE works with Product Management to understand the strategic objectives and the vision for the ART. This helps to ensure that the Backlog items align with the overall goals of the organization.
•Collaborating with Stakeholders: The RTE brings together various stakeholders, including Business Owners, Product Owners, and other key figures, to discuss and agree on the priorities for the PI.
•Preparing for PI Planning: By prioritizing the ART Backlog, the RTE helps to set the stage for a successful PI Planning event, where teams will further refine and commit to the work for the upcoming PI.
Through these efforts, the RTE plays a pivotal role in driving the ART’s focus on delivering value that is aligned with the organization’s strategic goals1.
Which statement is true about the SAFe backlog model?
Capabilities are in the Program Backlog
Features are in the Program Backlog
Stories are in the Solution Backlog
 The SAFe backlog model is structured to organize work at different levels of the framework. The Program Backlog is specifically designed to hold upcoming Features that are intended to address user needs and deliver business benefits for a single Agile Release Train (ART). It also contains Enabler features necessary to build the Architectural Runway1. On the other hand, Capabilities are typically found in the Solution Backlog, which is intended to advance the Solution and may span multiple ARTs2. Stories, which are detailed implementations of work, are part of the Team Backlog3.
Who commits to the Iteration goals at the end of Iteration planning?
The Solution Owner
The Scrum Master
The team
The Product Owner
Iteration goals are a high-level summary of the business and technical goals that the Agile Team agrees to accomplish in an Iteration. As described in the Iteration Planning article on the SAFe website, the planning process produces a set of committed iteration goals. These goals are agreed upon by the Agile Team, which aligns team members to a common purpose and aligns teams to common Program Increment (PI) Objectives. It is the Agile Team that commits to the iteration goals, providing transparency and management information, and ensuring alignment and the ability to make necessary adjustments during the execution of the Planning Interval1.
During Program Increment (PI) execution, the System Team is unclear about how to test some of the larger Features. What should a Release Train Engineer do?
Allow the problem to reach a critical point knowing that a minor failure is a tech-nique for learning
Encourage the System Team and Product Management to meet and collaborate on a solution
Escalate the problem to senior management to get the required action
Direct Product Management to define the use cases for the Features
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) is a servant leader whose responsibilities include facilitating ART events and processes, and supporting teams in delivering value. They help manage risks, escalate impediments, and drive relentless improvement1.
During Program Increment (PI) execution, when the System Team is unclear about how to test some of the larger Features, the RTE should encourage collaboration between the System Team and Product Management. This is because the RTE’s role is to facilitate problem-solving by bringing together the necessary parties to find solutions, rather than allowing problems to escalate or directing others to solve them1.
The RTE’s approach to this situation would typically involve:
Identifying the Impediment: Recognizing that the System Team’s uncertainty about testing is an impediment to progress.
Facilitating Collaboration: Arranging a meeting between the System Team and Product Management to discuss and resolve the testing challenges.
Encouraging Problem-Solving: Guiding the discussion to ensure that it is focused on finding practical solutions for testing the Features.
Supporting Implementation: Once a solution is agreed upon, the RTE would assist in implementing the solution and ensuring that it is effectively integrated into the PI execution process.
This approach aligns with the RTE’s responsibility to facilitate processes and support teams, ensuring that value is delivered and continuous improvement is achieved within the ART1.
Which statement is true about the definition of done (DoD)?
The DoD is not used by the teams because it is used as a method to manage tech-nical debt across the ART
At the higher levels there is only one DoD for everything that passes through the Agile Release Train to a Solution increment or a release
The teams share one common DoD
The DoD should evolve as system capabilities evolve
The Definition of Done (DoD) is a critical concept within the SAFe framework that ensures quality and completeness in deliverables. Here’s a step-by-step explanation of why the DoD should evolve as system capabilities evolve:
Initial Establishment: Teams within an Agile Release Train (ART) initially establish a DoD to ensure that all deliverables meet a certain quality standard and are truly “doneâ€.
Continuous Improvement: As the system capabilities grow and the product evolves, the DoD must also evolve to incorporate new criteria that align with the current state of the system.
Alignment with System Growth: The evolution of the DoD is necessary to accommodate the increased complexity and new technological advancements that come with system growth.
Ensuring Quality: An evolving DoD ensures that the quality of the product does not degrade as new features and capabilities are added.
Reflecting Current Standards: The DoD should reflect the most current development, testing, and compliance standards to ensure that the product remains competitive and secure.
Adaptation to Feedback: Feedback from stakeholders, customers, and users may lead to changes in the system that should be reflected in the DoD.
Scaling: As more teams and ARTs are involved, the DoD must scale to ensure uniformity and consistency across the entire solution.
In conclusion, the DoD is not static; it must adapt to the changing landscape of the system’s capabilities to ensure that the ART continues to deliver high-quality, valuable increments to the end-users1.
What can a Release Train Engineer use to support relentless improvement for the Pro-gram Increment?
Inspect and Adapt event
Iteration retrospective
Product Owner sync
Release management meeting
 The Release Train Engineer (RTE) plays a crucial role in facilitating events and processes that support relentless improvement within the Program Increment (PI). According to the SAFe framework, one of the primary responsibilities of the RTE is to “facilitate ART practices and PI execution†and to "drive relentless improvement"1.
The Inspect and Adapt (I&A) event is specifically designed as a significant event held at the end of each PI, where the current state of the Solution is demonstrated and evaluated. Teams then reflect and identify improvement backlog items via a structured problem-solving workshop2. This aligns with the SAFe principle of relentless improvement, which is a core value and a dimension of the Continuous Learning Culture competency within SAFe2.
During the I&A event, all ART stakeholders participate along with the Agile Teams. The result is a set of improvement backlog items that go into the ART Backlog for the next PI Planning event, ensuring that every ART improves every PI2. This structured approach to reflection and problem-solving is what makes the Inspect and Adapt event a key mechanism for the RTE to support relentless improvement for the Program Increment.
What does an effective Scrum Master help the team with?
Risk mitigation
Team metrics
Relentless improvement
Deploying work
An effective Scrum Master helps the team with relentless improvement. According to the SAFe framework, the Scrum Master is a servant leader and coach for an Agile team who facilitates team events and processes, and supports teams and Agile Release Trains (ARTs) in delivering value. They help educate the team in Scrum, Built-in-Quality, Kanban, and SAFe, ensuring that the agreed Agile processes are followed. Moreover, they assist in removing impediments and fostering an environment for high-performing team dynamics, continuous flow, and relentless improvement1.
The Scrum Master’s role includes coaching teams in self-organization and self-management, helping them coordinate and participate in ART events, and increasing the effectiveness of SAFe across the organization. They are integral members of an Agile Team and share responsibilities with the team for their overall performance. The Scrum Master has specialty skills that support adopting SAFe Scrum practices, ensuring no substantial gaps, and that the team knows how to plan, execute, review, and retrospect. They can also actively coach SAFe Team Kanban teams and help each Agile Team achieve Team Flow1.
In summary, the Scrum Master’s responsibilities are centered around guiding the team towards continuous improvement and helping them overcome challenges that may impede their progress. This relentless pursuit of improvement is fundamental to the Scrum Master’s role within the SAFe framework1.
How does a Release Train Engineer view the role of functional managers on the Agile Release Train?
As decision makers
As developers of people
As a content authority for work
As problem solvers
 According to the SAFe framework, the role of functional managers in an Agile Release Train (ART) is evolving. While they were traditionally seen as decision-makers and content authorities, in a Lean-Agile context, their role shifts towards developing people. This is aligned with the SAFe principle of empowering and developing individuals and teams to improve their capabilities and contribute to the organization’s success.
The Release Train Engineer (RTE) views functional managers as crucial in growing the skills and capabilities of their people. This perspective is supported by the SAFe guidance on the evolving role of managers, which emphasizes that managers should focus on coaching, career development, and enabling the continuous improvement of their teams. The RTE, as a servant leader, facilitates this by coaching leaders, teams, and Scrum Masters in the new mindset and processes, thus supporting the functional managers in their role as developers of people12.
What action can result in reduced collaboration between teams during the Program Increment (PI) Planning event?
Skip the Inspect and Adapt event
Include inexperienced team members
Start the Agile Release Train without a System Team in place
Overprepare for PI Planning
Starting an Agile Release Train (ART) without a System Team in place can lead to reduced collaboration between teams during the Program Increment (PI) Planning event. The System Team plays a vital role in supporting the ART by addressing system-level issues and enabling integration across different teams. Without this support, teams may face challenges in integrating their work with others, leading to silos and reduced collaboration. The presence of a System Team is essential for facilitating effective communication and collaboration during PI Planning, ensuring that teams can work together efficiently and that dependencies are managed properly12.
TESTED 06 Jan 2026