Scrum PSPO-II Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

According to the Professional Scrum Product Ownerâ„¢ II certification guide1, the Definition of Done is a formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product. The Definition of Done creates transparency by providing everyone a shared understanding of what work was completed and what standards were met as part of the Increment. If the Definition of Done is not met, the Increment is not Done and cannot be released. Therefore, the following statements are true:

A. The next Sprint may be interrupted when quality issues are encountered. This is true because the Scrum Team may have to spend time fixing the quality issues in the previous Increment before working on the new Sprint Backlog items. This may affect the Sprint Goal and the delivery of value.

C. The indication of progress on the Product Backlog is not transparent. This is true because the Product Backlog items that were supposedly Done in the previous Sprint are actually not Done according to the Definition of Done. This means that the Product Owner cannot accurately forecast the release plan and the stakeholders cannot trust the progress reports.

D. The Scrum Team should not release the Increment. This is true because releasing an Increment that does not meet the Definition of Done may compromise the quality, usability, and value of the product. It may also damage the reputation and trust of the Scrum Team and the organization.

E. The incomplete Sprint Backlog items should be returned to the Product Backlog. This is true because the Sprint Backlog items that were not Done according to the Definition of Done are still part of the Product Backlog. The Product Owner should re-order them based on their value and priority and decide when to include them in the next Sprint.

The following statement is false:

B. The project manager cannot effectively update the plan. This is false because there is no project manager role in Scrum. The Product Owner is responsible for managing the Product Backlog and the value delivery, while the Scrum Master is responsible for facilitating the Scrum process and removing impediments. The Developers are responsible for managing the Sprint Backlog and the quality of the Increment.

References: 1: Professional Scrum Product Owner™ II Certification | Scrum.org

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario describes a product withlow Current Valueandhigh Unrealized Value, meaning that while the product is not currently delivering significant value, there is potential for substantial improvement.

Additionally:

A high product cost ratio (85%)means that a large portion of revenue is being consumed by operating costs, leaving little room for new development.

A long time-to-marketsuggests inefficiencies in the development and delivery process, preventing rapid iteration and improvement.

Given these conditions, thebest long-term strategy is to address the underlying inefficiencies before attempting to innovate.

Analysis of Answer Choices:

Option A: Drop the product(Incorrect)

Abandoning the product is premature, as theUnrealized Value is high.

High Unrealized Value indicates potential customer demand or market opportunity that has not yet been tapped.

A Product Owner should first explore ways to unlock that value before considering discontinuation.

Option B: Improve efficiency by eliminating waste(Correct)

Addressing inefficiencies inproduct development, delivery, and cost structureis a fundamental step before attempting new innovations.

By reducing waste, improving operational efficiency, and lowering costs, the teamcan free up resources to invest in new high-value features.

Scrum and Agile emphasize continuous improvement—optimizing processes enables faster, more cost-effective feature development in the future.

Option C: Focus on high-value features despite inefficiencies(Incorrect)

While prioritizing high-value features is important, thelack of capacity and long time-to-marketwould limit the effectiveness of this strategy.

Without firstimproving efficiency, the product will continue to struggle with slow delivery, high costs, and missed opportunities.

Key Scrum and Agile Principles Supporting This Answer:

Continuous Improvement: Scrum promotes regularinspection and adaptationto optimize processes and eliminate waste.

Sustainable Development: Focusing on long-term product viability requiresfixing systemic inefficienciesbefore pursuing new growth.

Empirical Process Control: Decisions should be based on data; the data here suggests inefficiencies are a major blocker to success.

Conclusion:

Thebest approach is to first improve efficiency by eliminating waste, reducing costs, and accelerating time-to-market. Once the team has built a solid foundation, they can thenfocus on innovation and unlocking the Unrealized Value of the product.

 A “cone of uncertainty” is a graphical representation of the evolution of the amount of uncertainty during a project. It shows that at the beginning of a project, there is a high degree of variability and unpredictability in the estimates of the scope, cost, time, and value of the product. As the project progresses, more information and feedback are gathered, and the uncertainty decreases, reaching zero when the product is delivered and validated. A “cone of uncertainty” can be used to visualize the uncertainty of the potential value that a Scrum Team delivers over time, and to guide the empirical process of inspection and adaptation. By using a “cone of uncertainty”, a Scrum Team can:

Align the expectations of the stakeholders and customers with the reality of the complex and dynamic environment.

Avoid making premature or unrealistic commitments based on inaccurate or incomplete estimates.

Embrace change and experimentation as opportunities to learn and deliver more value.

Inspect the actual value delivered and the feedback received, and adapt the product vision, strategy, and backlog accordingly.

Forecast the range of possible outcomes and the level of confidence for each Sprint and release.

The other options are not valid uses of a “cone of uncertainty”. A “cone of uncertainty” does not represent the relative level of difficulty for predicting the velocity of individual team members, as velocity is a measure of the amount of work done by the whole Scrum Team, not by individuals. A “cone of uncertainty” does not rapidly identify and prioritize all uncertainties, as uncertainties are not always known or quantifiable, and may change over time. A “cone of uncertainty” does not determine whether to cut quality, similar to the “Iron Triangle” of project management, as quality is not a variable that can be traded off inScrum, but a non-negotiable aspect of the Definition of Done and the value proposition of the product.

References:

Professional Scrum Product Ownerâ„¢ II Certification

Managing Products with Agility

Cone of Uncertainty - Wikipedia