Cisco 300-110 Exam Dumps - Actual Questions Answers

Link Aggregation Group (LAG) is the correct design approach for a single Cisco 9800-40 WLC that requires high availability between the WLC and the core switch in the event of a cable failure. LAG combines multiple physical ports on the WLC into a single logical channel, providing both redundancy (traffic automatically redistributes across remaining links when one fails) and load balancing (traffic is distributed across all active links). Importantly, LAG operates transparently to AP management — APs see a single logical uplink regardless of which physical port their traffic traverses. With a single WLC, Multi-LAG (Option B) is not applicable — Multi-LAG is a feature of the Catalyst 9800 that allows multiple separate LAG bundles for different network connections, typically used with SSO pairs. LACP (Option C) is the protocol used to negotiate LAG member links — it is the mechanism within LAG, not an independent design approach. PAgP (Option D) is a Cisco proprietary alternative to LACP for port aggregation but the question asks for the design approach, which is LAG. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Catalyst 9800 LAG Design, Port Redundancy and Load Balancing, Single-Controller High Availability.

The issue described indicates that there are more critical priority access points than the backup Cisco WLC can accommodate with its available AP licenses. The backup WLC has only 10 licenses available, but 7 APs are set to critical failover priority and 5 to high failover priority — a total of 12 APs attempting to join. Even though critical priority APs are processed before high priority APs, the backup WLC can only accept 10 APs total (its license limit). Since there are 7 critical priority APs and only 10 total licenses, all 7 critical APs will fail over successfully — but if the scenario involves additional critical APs beyond the license limit, the excess will not be able to join. The oversubscription of the critical priority AP count relative to available backup WLC capacity is the root cause. AP failover priority being disabled (Option D) would mean all APs have equal priority, not that critical APs fail to join. ' network ap-priority set to enable ' (Option B) enables the priority processing globally, which would be required for the feature to work at all. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — AP Failover Priority, N+1 Redundancy License Planning, WLC License Capacity Management.

The Cisco Catalyst 9300-48HX is a high-density PoE switch specifically designed for Cisco Catalyst 9100 Series AP deployments. The 48HX variant features 48 Multi-Gigabit PoE ports with IEEE 802.3bt (PoE++) support, providing up to 90W per port. The Cisco 9166 Access Point is a Wi-Fi 6E AP that requires IEEE 802.3bt (PoE++) power to achieve full radio functionality — enabling all three radios including the 6 GHz radio. In a two-switch stack of 48HX units, the total PoE budget is designed and rated to support full-port utilization with Cisco 9100 series APs simultaneously. The design intent is to connect APs to all ports on all switches — maximizing the deployment density and ensuring every AP runs with full functionality. Connecting to only half the ports on one switch (Option B), half of each switch (Option C), or all ports on only one switch (Option D) would underutilize the infrastructure and fail to achieve the full deployment density that the switch stack was architected to deliver. The AP naming scheme requiring sequential area numbering requires all APs to be connected and fully operational across the entire stack. Reference: WLSD Study Guide — Catalyst 9300 PoE Infrastructure, 9166 AP Power Requirements, High-Density Wired Infrastructure Design.