SAA-C03 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03) Question and Answers

To protect the web application from DDoS attacks originating from random IP addresses, a solutions architect should subscribe to AWS Shield Advanced and engage the AWS DDoS Response Team (DRT) to integrate mitigating controls into the service. AWS Shield Advanced is a managed service that provides protection against large and sophisticated DDoS attacks, with access to 24/7 support and response from the DRT. The DRT can help the city configure proactive and reactive safeguards, such as AWS WAF rules, rate-based rules, and network ACLs, to block malicious traffic and improve the application’s resilience. The service also provides an audit trail for the DDoS sources through detailed attack reports and Amazon CloudWatch metrics.

Deletion protection is a feature of DynamoDB that prevents accidental deletion of tables. When deletion protection is enabled, you cannot delete a table unless you explicitly disable it first. This adds an extra layer of security and reduces the risk of data loss and operational disruption. Deletion protection is easy to enable and disable using the AWS Management Console, the AWSCLI, or the DynamoDB API. This solution has the least operational overhead, as you do not need to create, manage, or invoke any additional resources or services. References:

Using deletion protection to protect your table

Preventing Accidental Table Deletion in DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB now supports table deletion protection

AWS DataSync is a data transfer service that makes it easy for you to move large amounts of data online between on-premises storage and AWS storage services over the internet or AWS Direct Connect. DataSync automatically encrypts your data in transit using TLS encryption, and verifies data integrity during transfer using checksums. DataSync can transfer data up to 10 times faster than open-source tools, and reduces operational overhead by simplifying and automating tasks such as scheduling, monitoring, and resuming transfers. References:https://aws.amazon.com/datasync/

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of hosting a scalable web application that can handle large data transfers from different geographic regions. Amazon EC2 provides scalable compute capacity for hosting web applications. Auto Scaling can automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances based on the demand and traffic patterns. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that can cache static and dynamic content at edge locations closer to the users, reducing latency and improving performance. CloudFront can also use S3 Transfer Acceleration to speed up the transfers between S3 buckets and CloudFront edge locations.

AWS Fargate is a serverless experience for user applications, allowing the user to concentrate on building applications instead of configuring and managing servers. Fargate also automates resource management, allowing users to easily scale their applications in response to demand.

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it leverages the serverless and event-driven capabilities of AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge. AWS Lambda allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers, and you pay only for the compute time you consume. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus service that lets you connect your applications with data from various sources and routes that data to targets such as AWS Lambda. By using Amazon EventBridge, you can create a rule that triggers a Lambda function to run the program when reports are requested, and you can also schedule the rule to run during the last week of each month. This way, you can generate reports in the least amount of time and pay only for the resources you use.

AWS Control Tower is a fully managed service that simplifies the setup and governance of a secure, compliant, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and it enables governance using controls you can choose from a pre-packaged list. The landing zone is a well-architected, multi-account baseline that follows AWS best practices. Controls implement governance rules for security, compliance, and operations. AWS Security Hub is a service that provides a comprehensive view of your security posture across your AWS accounts. It aggregates, organizes, and prioritizes security alerts and findings from multiple AWS services, such as Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, Amazon Macie, AWS Firewall Manager, and AWS IAM Access Analyzer, as well as from AWS Partner solutions. AWS Security Hub continuously monitors your environment using automatedcompliance checks based on the AWS best practices and industry standards, such as the AWS Foundational Security Best Practices (FSBP) standard. AWS Control Tower Account Factory is a feature that automates the provisioning of new AWS accounts that are preconfigured to meet your business, security, and compliance requirements. By deploying an AWS Control Tower environment in the Organizations management account, you can leverage the existing organization structure and policies, and enable AWS Security Hub and AWS Control Tower Account Factory in the environment. This way, you can audit all API calls and logins in any existing or new AWS account, monitor the compliance status of each account with the FSBP standard, and provision new accounts with ease and consistency. This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, as you do not need to manage any infrastructure, perform any data migration, or submit any requests for changes.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of releasing the new version of APIs with minimal effects on customers and minimal data loss. A canary release deployment is a software development strategy in which a new version of an API is deployed for testing purposes, and the base version remains deployed as a production release for normal operations on the same stage. In a canary release deployment, total API traffic is separated at random into a production release and a canary release with a pre-configured ratio. Typically, the canary release receives a small percentage of API traffic and the production release takes up the rest. The updated API features are only visible to API traffic through the canary. You can adjust the canary traffic percentage to optimize test coverage or performance. By keeping canary traffic small and the selection random, most users are not adversely affected at any time by potential bugs in the new version, and no single user is adversely affected all the time. After the test metrics pass your requirements, you can promote the canary release to the production release and disable the canary from the deployment. This makes the new features available in the production stage.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is operationally efficient, as it only requires one activation of the cost allocation tag and one creation of the cost report from the management account, which has access to all the member accounts’ data and billing preferences.

It is consistent, as it uses the AWS-defined cost allocation tag named department, which is automatically applied to resources when the company creates tags using the tagging policy enforced by AWS Organizations. This ensures that the tag name and value are the same across all the resources and accounts, and avoids any discrepancies or errors that might arise from user-defined tags.

It is informative, as it creates one cost report in Cost Explorer grouping by the tag name, and filters by EC2. This allows the accounting team to see the breakdown of EC2 consumption and costs by department, regardless of the AWS account. The team can also use other features of Cost Explorer, such as charts, filters, and forecasts, to analyze and optimize the spending.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of migrating a 20 TB MySQL database within 2 weeks with minimal downtime and cost-effectively. The AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized device has up to 80 TB of usable storage space, which is enough to fit the database. The AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can migrate data from MySQL to Amazon Aurora, Amazon RDS for MySQL, or MySQL on Amazon EC2 with minimal downtime by continuously replicating changes from the source to the target. The AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT) can convert the source schema and code to a format compatible with the target database. By using these services together, the company can migrate the database to AWS with minimal downtime and cost. The Snowball Edge device can be shipped back to AWS to finish the migration and continue the ongoing replication until the database is fully migrated.

it allows the solutions architect to create a separate organization for the research and development (R&D) business and move its AWS account to the new organization. By inviting the R&D AWS account to be part of the new organization after it has left the prior organization, the solutions architect can ensure that there is no overlap or conflict between the two organizations. The R&D AWS account can accept or decline the invitation to join the new organization. Once accepted, it will be subject to any policies and controls applied by the new organization. References:

Inviting an AWS Account to Join Your Organization

Leaving an Organization as a Member Account

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is the least effort, as it does not require any additional AWS services, custom scripts, or data processing steps. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. You can use Athena to query CloudTrail logs directly from the S3 bucket where they are stored, without any data loading or transformation. You can also use the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the Athena API to run and manage your queries.

It is effective, as it allows you to filter, aggregate, and join CloudTrail log data using SQL syntax. You can use various SQL functions and operators to specify the criteria for identifyingAccess Denied and Unauthorized errors, such as the error code, the user identity, the event source, the event name, the event time, and the resource ARN. You can also use subqueries, views, and common table expressions to simplify and optimize your queries.

It is flexible, as it allows you to customize and save your queries for future use. You can also export the query results to other formats, such as CSV or JSON, or integrate them with other AWS services, such as Amazon QuickSight, for further analysis and visualization.

Amazon Cognito user pools provide a secure and scalable user directory for user authentication and management. User pools support various authentication methods, such as username and password, email and password, phone number and password, and social identity providers. User pools also support multi-factor authentication (MFA), which adds an extra layer of security by requiring users to provide a verification code or a biometric factor in addition to their credentials. User pools can also enable risk-based adaptive authentication, which dynamically adjusts the authentication challenge based on the risk level of the sign-in attempt. For example, if a user tries to sign in from an unfamiliar device or location, the user pool can require a stronger authentication factor, such as SMS or email verification code. This feature helps to protect user accounts from unauthorized access and reduce the friction for legitimate users. User pools can scale up to millions of users and integrate with other AWS services, such as Amazon SNS, Amazon SES, AWS Lambda, and AWS KMS.

Amazon Cognito identity pools provide a way to federate identities from multiple identity providers, such as user pools, social identity providers, and corporate identity providers. Identity pools allow users to access AWS resources with temporary, limited-privilege credentials. Identity pools do not provide user authentication or management features, such as MFA or adaptive authentication. Therefore, option B is not correct.

AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) is a service that helps to manage access to AWS resources. IAM users are entities that represent people or applications that need to interact with AWS. IAM users can be authenticated with a password or an access key. IAM users can also enable MFA for their own accounts, by using the AllowManageOwnUserMFA action in an IAM policy. However, IAM users are not suitable for user authentication for web or mobile applications, as they are intended for administrative purposes. IAM users also do not support adaptive authentication based on risk factors. Therefore, option C is not correct.

AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On) is a service that enables users to sign in to multiple AWS accounts and applications with a single set of credentials. AWS SSO supports various identity sources, such as AWS SSO directory, AWS Managed Microsoft AD, and external identity providers. AWS SSO also supports MFA for user authentication, which can be configured in the permission sets that define the level of access for each user. However, AWSSSO does not support adaptive authentication based on risk factors. Therefore, option D is not correct.

https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/features/

"Provisioned IOPS volumes are backed by solid-state drives (SSDs) and are the highest performance EBS volumes designed for your critical, I/O intensive database applications.

These volumes are ideal for both IOPS-intensive and throughput-intensive workloads that require extremely low latency."

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/CHAP_Storage.html

This option is the most cost-effective and scalable way to process the files uploaded to S3. AWS CloudTrail is used to log API calls, not to trigger actions based on them. AWS AppSync is a service for building GraphQL APIs, not for processing files. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is used to ingest and process streaming data, not to send data to S3. Amazon SNS is a pub/sub service that can be used to notify subscribers of events, not to process files. References:

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3

AWS CloudTrail FAQs

What Is AWS AppSync?

[What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Streams?]

[What Is Amazon Simple Notification Service?]

This answer is correct because it provides a resilient and durable replacement for the on-premises file share that is compatible with Windows IIS web servers. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed service that provides shared file storage built on Windows Server. It supports the SMB protocol and integrates with Microsoft ActiveDirectory, which enables seamless access and authentication for Windows-based applications. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server also offers the following benefits:

Resilience: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server can be deployed in multiple Availability Zones, which provides high availability and failover protection. It also supports automatic backups and restores, as well as self-healing features that detect and correct issues.

Durability: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server replicates data within and across Availability Zones, and stores data on highly durable storage devices. It also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as file access auditing and data deduplication.

Performance: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server delivers consistent sub-millisecond latencies and high throughput for file operations. It also supports SSD storage, native Windows features such as Distributed File System (DFS) Namespaces and Replication, and user-driven performance scaling.

By configuring the Amazon FSx file share to use an AWS KMS CMK to encrypt the images in the file share, the company can protect the images from unauthorized access and comply with company policy. By using NTFS permission sets on the images, the company can prevent accidental deletion of the images by restricting who can modify or delete them.

The solution that will meet the requirement of ensuring that all data that is written to the EBS volumes is encrypted at rest is B. Create the EBS volumes as encrypted volumes and attach the encrypted EBS volumes to the EC2 instances. When you create an EBS volume, you can specify whether to encrypt the volume. If you choose to encrypt the volume, all data written to the volume is automatically encrypted at rest using AWS-managed keys. You can also use customer-managed keys (CMKs) stored in AWS KMS to encrypt and protect your EBS volumes. You can create encrypted EBS volumes and attach them to EC2 instances to ensure that all data written to the volumes is encrypted at rest.

SCPs are a type of organization policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization. SCPs help you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines1.

To apply an SCP to a specific set of accounts, you need to create an OU for those accounts and attach the SCP to the OU. This way, the SCP affects only the member accounts in that OU and not the other accounts in the organization. If you attach the SCP to the root OU, it will apply to all accounts in the organization, including the production account, which is not the desired outcome. If you attach the SCP to the management account, it will have no effect, as SCPs do not affect users or roles in the management account1.

Therefore, the best solutions to deploy the SCP are B and E. Option B attaches the SCP directly to the three nonproduction accounts, while option E creates a separate OU for the nonproductionaccounts and attaches the SCP to the OU. Both options will achieve the same result of restricting the EC2instance types in the nonproduction accounts, but option E might be more scalable and manageable if there are more accounts or policies to be applied in the future2.

for "Highly available": Multi-AZ & for "least amount of changes to the application": Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment, from capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling to application health monitoring

This solution will meet the requirements because Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is a fully managed service that provides highly reliable, scalable, and feature-rich file storage built on NetApp’s popular ONTAP file system. FSx for ONTAP supports both NFS and SMB protocols, which means it can be accessed by both Linux and Windows applications without code changes. FSx for ONTAP also eliminates data duplication and inefficient resource usage by automatically tiering infrequently accessed data to a lower-cost storage tier and providing storage efficiency features such as deduplication and compression. FSx for ONTAP also integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon S3, AWS Backup, and AWS CloudFormation. By migrating the applications to Amazon EC2 instances, the company can leverage the scalability, security, and performance of AWS compute resources. 

This option is the most efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), which is a service that lets you easily provision,manage, and deploy public and private SSL/TLS certificates for use with AWS services and your internal connected resources1. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is required for using an ACM certificate with CloudFront2. It also meets therequirement of deploying the certificate without incurring any additional costs, as ACM does not charge for certificates that are used with supported AWS services3. This solution meets the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates and using a different domain name for the distribution. Option A is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is a type of certificate that can be used only within your organization or virtual private cloud (VPC). However, this does not meet the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates, as CloudFront requires a public certificate. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is correct. Option B is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is incorrect for the same reason as option A. It also requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region. Option D is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from ACM, which is correct. However, it requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can crawl, catalog, and prepare data for analysis. AWS Glue can automatically discover the schema and partitioning of the data stored in Apache Parquet format in S3, and create a table in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that can run SQL queries directly on data in S3, without requiring any data loading or transformation. Athena can use the table metadata from the AWS Glue Data Catalog to query the data in S3. By using AWS Glue and Athena, you can analyze the log files in S3 most cost-effectively, as you only pay for the resources consumed by the crawler and the queries, and you do not need to provision or manage any servers or clusters.

it allows the company to deploy an application that processes large quantities of data in parallel and prevent groups of nodes from sharing the same underlying hardware. By running the EC2 instances in a spread placement group, the company can launch a small number of instances across distinct underlying hardware to reduce correlated failures. A spread placement group ensures that each instance is isolated from each other at the rack level. References:

Placement Groups

Spread Placement Groups

To maximize resiliency and scalability, the best solution is to use an Amazon SQS queue as a destination for the jobs. This decouples the primary server from the compute nodes, allowing them to scale independently. This also helps to prevent job loss in the event of a failure. Using an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances for the compute nodes allows for automatic scaling based on the workload. In this case, it's recommended to configure the Auto Scaling group based on the size of the Amazon SQS queue, which is a better indicator of the actual workload than the load on the primary server or compute nodes. This approach ensures that the application can handle variable workloads, while also minimizing costs by automatically scaling up or down the compute nodes as needed.

A write-through caching strategy adds or updates data in the cache whenever data is written to the database. This ensures that the data in the cache is always consistent with the data in the database. A write-through caching strategy also reduces the cache miss penalty, as data is always available in the cache when it is requested. However, a write-through caching strategy can increase the write latency, as data has to be written to both the cache and the database. A write-through caching strategy is suitable for applications that require high data consistency and low read latency.

A lazy loading caching strategy only loads data into the cache when it is requested, and updates the cache when there is a cache miss. This can result in stale data in the cache, as data is not updated in the cache when it is changed in the database. A lazy loading caching strategy is suitable for applications that can tolerate some data inconsistency and have a low cache miss rate.

An adding TTL caching strategy assigns a time-to-live (TTL) value to each data item in the cache, and removes the data from the cache when the TTL expires. This can help prevent stale data in the cache, as data is periodically refreshed from the database. However, an adding TTL caching strategy can also increase the cache miss rate, as data can be evicted from the cache before it is requested. An adding TTL caching strategy is suitable for applications that have a high cache hit rate and can tolerate some data inconsistency.

An AWS AppConfig caching strategy is not a valid option, as AWS AppConfig is a service that enables customers to quickly deploy validated configurations to applications of any size and scale. AWS AppConfig does not provide a caching layer for web applications.

The company wants to improve the availability and performance of the application, as well as protect it against common web exploits. The company also needs static IP addresses for the application. To meet these requirements, a solutions architect should recommend the following solution:

Put the EC2 instances behind Network Load Balancers (NLBs) in each Region. NLBs are designed to handle millions of requests per second while maintaining high throughput at ultra-low latency. NLBs also support static IP addresses for each Availability Zone, which can be useful for whitelisting or firewalling purposes.

Deploy AWS WAF on the NLBs. AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect web applications from common web exploits that could affect availability, security, or performance. AWS WAF lets you define customizable web security rules that control which traffic to allow or block to your web applications.

Create an accelerator using AWS Global Accelerator and register the NLBs as endpoints. AWS Global Accelerator is a service that improves the availability and performance of your applications with local or global users. It provides static IP addresses that act as a fixed entry point to your application endpoints in any AWS Region. It uses the AWS global network to optimize the path from your users to your applications, improving the performance of your TCP and UDP traffic.

This solution will provide high availability across Availability Zones and Regions, improve performance by routing traffic over the AWS global network, protect the application from common web attacks, and provide static IP addresses for the application.

This solution meets the requirements of a two-tier application that has a variable demand based on the time of day and must be available at all times, while minimizing the overall cost. EC2 Reserved Instances can provide significant savings compared to On-Demand Instances for the baseline level of usage, and they can guarantee capacity reservation when needed. EC2 Spot Instances can provide up to 90% savings compared to On-Demand Instances for any additional capacity that the application needs during peak hours. Spot Instances are suitable for stateless applications that can tolerate interruptions and can be replaced by other instances. Stopping the RDS database when it is not in use can reduce the cost of running the database tier.

Option A is incorrect because using all EC2 Spot Instances can affect the availability of the application if there are not enough spare capacity or if the Spot price exceeds the maximum price. Stopping the RDS database when it is not in use can reduce the cost of running the database tier, but it can also affect the availability of the application. Option B is incorrect because purchasing EC2 Instance Savings Plans to cover five EC2 instances can lock in a fixed amount of compute usage per hour, which may not match the actual usage pattern of the application. Purchasing an RDS Reserved DB Instance can provide savings for the database tier, but it does not allow stopping the database when it is not in use. Option D is incorrect becausepurchasing EC2 Instance Savings Plans to cover two EC2 instances can lock in a fixed amount of compute usage per hour, which may not match the actual usage pattern of the application. Using up to three additional EC2 On-Demand Instances as needed can incur higher costs than using Spot Instances.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of running the ML models as independent microservices that can handle irregular and unpredictable usage patterns. By directing the requests from the API into an Amazon SQS queue, the company can decouple therequest processing from the model execution, and ensure that no requests are lost due to spikes in demand. By deploying the models as Amazon ECS services that read from the queue, the company can leverage containers to isolate and package each model as a microservice, and fetch the model data from S3 at startup. By enabling AWS Auto Scaling on Amazon ECS for both the cluster and copies of the service based on the queue size, the company can automatically scale up or down the number of EC2 instances in the cluster and the number of tasks in each service to match the demand and optimize performance.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can create Lambda functions using various languages, including Java, and specify the amount of memory and CPU allocated to your function. Lambda charges you only for the compute time you consume, which is calculated based on the number of requests and the duration of your code execution. You can use Amazon EventBridge to trigger your Lambda function on a schedule, such as every hour, using cron or rate expressions. This solution will optimize the costs to run the job, as you will not payfor any idle time or unused resources, unlike running the job on an EC2 instance. References: 1: AWS Lambda - FAQs2, General Information section2: Tutorial:Schedule AWS Lambda functions using EventBridge3, Introduction section3: Schedule expressions using rate or cron - AWS Lambda4, Introduction section.

**AWS PrivateLink provides private connectivity between VPCs, AWS services, and your on-premises networks, without exposing your traffic to the public internet**. AWS PrivateLink makes it easy to connect services across different accounts and VPCs to significantly simplify your network architecture. Interface **VPC endpoints**, powered by AWS PrivateLink, connect you to services hosted by AWS Partners and supported solutions available in AWS Marketplace. https://aws.amazon.com/privatelink/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_manage_policies_scps_examples_vpc.html#example_vpc_2

it allows the company to store and deliver images to users in a highly available and cost-effective way. By storing images in Amazon S3 Standard, the company can use a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that offers high availability and performance. By using S3 Standard to directly deliver images by using a static website, the company can avoid running web servers and reduce operational overhead. S3 Standard also offers low storage pricing and free data transfer within AWS Regions. References:

Amazon S3 Storage Classes

Hosting a Static Website on Amazon S3

Understanding the Requirement: The robotics company needs a public load balancer to ensure seamless communication with backend services, route traffic based on query strings, and encrypt traffic.

Analysis of Options:

Network Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: NLBs primarily operate at the transport layer (Layer 4) and do not natively support query parameter-based routing, which is a Layer 7 feature.

Gateway Load Balancer with IAM Certificate: Gateway Load Balancers are designed for deploying, scaling, and managing third-party virtual appliances and do not support HTTP path-based or query parameter-based routing.

Application Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: ALBs operate at the application layer (Layer 7), supporting features like query parameter-based routing and SSL/TLS termination with ACM certificates.

Network Load Balancer with IAM Certificate: As with the first option, NLBs do not support query parameter-based routing, making it unsuitable for this requirement.

Best Solution:

Application Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: This option provides the necessary Layer 7 routing capabilities and SSL/TLS termination to meet the requirements for query parameter-based routing and encrypted communication.

Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity1. Amazon Inspector can scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities and provide a report of each instance’s patch status. AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager is a capability of AWS Systems Manager that automates the process of patching managed nodes with both security-related updates and other types of updates. Patch Manager uses patch baselines, which include rules for auto-approving patches within days of their release, in addition to optional lists of approved and rejected patches. Patch Manager can patch fleets of Amazon EC2 instances, edge devices, on-premises servers, and virtual machines (VMs) by operating system type2. PatchManager can patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule and provide a report of each instance’s patch status. Therefore, the combination of Amazon Inspector and AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager will meet the requirements of the question.

The other options are not valid because:

Amazon Macie is a security service that uses machine learning to automatically discover, classify, and protect sensitive data in AWS. Amazon Macie does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather for data classification and protection3. A cron job is a Linux command for scheduling a task to be executed sometime in the future. A cron job is not a reliable way to patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule, as it may fail or be interrupted by other processes4.

Amazon GuardDuty is a threat detection service that continuously monitors for malicious activity and unauthorized behavior to protect your AWS accounts and workloads. Amazon GuardDuty does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather for network and API activity anomalies5. AWS Systems Manager Session Manager is a fully managed AWS Systems Manager capability that lets you manage your Amazon EC2 instances, edge devices, on-premises servers, and virtual machines (VMs) through an interactive one-click browser-based shell or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). Session Manager does not patch theEC2 instances on a regular schedule, but rather provides secure and auditable node management2.

Amazon Detective is a security service that makes it easy to analyze, investigate, and quickly identify the root cause of potential security issues or suspicious activities. Amazon Detective does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather collects and analyzes data from AWS sources such as Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon VPC Flow Logs, and AWS CloudTrail. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus that makes it easy to connect applications using data from your own applications, integrated Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications, and AWS services. EventBridge delivers a stream of real-time data from event sources, such as Zendesk, Datadog, or Pagerduty, and routes that data to targets like AWS Lambda. EventBridge does not patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule, but rather triggers actions based on events.

A public NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to send outbound traffic to the internet, while preventing the internet from initiating connections with the instances. A public NAT gateway requires an elastic IP address and a route to the internet gateway for the VPC. A private NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to connect to other VPCs or on-premises networks through a transit gateway or a virtual private gateway. A private NAT gateway does not require an elastic IP address or an internet gateway. Both private and public NAT gateways map the source private IPv4 address of the instances to the private IPv4 address of the NAT gateway, but in the case of a public NAT gateway, the internet gateway then maps the private IPv4 address of the public NAT gateway to the elastic IP address associated with the NAT gateway. When sending response traffic to the instances, whether it’s a public or private NAT gateway, the NAT gateway translates the address back to the original source IP address.

Creating public NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option A) is not a valid solution, as the NAT gateways would not have a route to the internet gateway. Creating private NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option B) is also not a valid solution, as the instances would not be able to access the internet through the private NATgateways. Creating private NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option D) is not a valid solution either, as the internet gateway would drop the traffic from the private NAT gateways.

Therefore, the only valid solution is to create public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option C), as this would allow the instances to access the internet through the public NAT gateways and the internet gateway. References:

NAT gateways - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

NAT gateway use cases - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Amazon Web Services – Introduction to NAT Gateways

What is AWS NAT Gateway? - KnowledgeHut

To satisfy the security requirements, the solutions architect should download AWS-provided root certificates and provide the certificates in all connections to the RDS instance. This will enable SSL/TLS encryption for data in transit between the application and the RDS instance. SSL/TLS encryption provides a layer of security by encrypting data that moves between the client and the server. Amazon RDS creates an SSL certificate and installs the certificate on the DB instance when the instance is provisioned.The application can use the AWS-provided root certificates to verify the identity of the DB instance and establish a secure connection1.

The other options are not correct because they do not enable encryption for data in transit or are not relevant for the use case. Enabling IAM database authentication on the database is not correct because this option only provides a method of authentication, not encryption.IAM database authentication allows users to use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) users and roles to access a database, instead of using a database username and password2. Providing self-signed certificates is not correct because this option is not secure or reliable. Self-signed certificates are certificates that are signed by the same entity that issued them, instead of by a trusted certificate authority (CA).Self-signed certificates can be easily forged or compromised, and are not recognized by most browsers and applications3. Taking a snapshot of the RDS instance and restoring it to a new instance with encryption enabled is not correct because this option onlyenables encryption at rest, not encryption in transit.Encryption at rest protects data that is stored on disk, but does not protect data that is moving between the client and the server4.

This solution provides the appropriate user access most cost-effectively because it uses the Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class, which automatically optimizes storage costs by moving data to the most cost-effective access tier when access patterns change, without performance impact or operational overhead1. This storage class is ideal for datawith unknown, changing, or unpredictable access patterns, such as photos that are heavily viewed for months or less than a week. By storing the photo metadata and its S3 location in DynamoDB, the application can quickly query and retrieve the relevant photos for each user. DynamoDB is a fast, scalable, and fully managed NoSQL database service that supports key-value and document data models2.

AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data online between on-premises storage and AWS storage services. AWS DataSync can transfer data at speeds up to 10 times faster than open-source tools by using a purpose-built network protocol and parallelizing data transfers. AWS DataSync also handles encryption, data integrity verification, and bandwidth optimization. To use AWS DataSync, users need to deploy a DataSync agent on their on-premises servers, which connects to the NFS servers and syncs the data to Amazon S3. Users can schedule periodic or one-time sync tasks and monitor the progress and status of the transfers.

The other options are not correct because they are either not cost-effective or not suitable for the use case. Setting up AWS Glue to copy the data from the on-premises servers to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that is mainly used for extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations, not for simple data backup. Setting up an SFTP sync using AWS Transfer for SFTP to sync data from on premises to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that provides secure file transfer using the SFTP protocol, which is more suitable for exchanging data with third parties than for backing up data. Setting up an AWS Direct Connect connection between the on-premises data center and a VPC, and copying the data to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Direct Connect is a dedicated network connection between AWS and the on-premises location, which has high upfront costs and requires additional configuration.

The most suitable solution for optimizing the user experience by providing the lowest latency for content uploads is to upload and store content in Amazon S3 and use S3 Transfer Acceleration for the uploads. This solution will enable the company to leverage the AWS global network and edge locations to speed up the data transfer between the users and the S3 buckets.

Amazon S3 is a storage service that provides scalable, durable, and highly available object storage for any type of data.Amazon S3 allows users to store and retrieve datafrom anywhere on the web, and offers various features such as encryption, versioning, lifecycle management, and replication1.

S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature of Amazon S3 that helps users transfer data to and from S3 buckets more quickly. S3 Transfer Acceleration works by using optimized network paths and Amazon’s backbone network to accelerate data transfer speeds.Userscan enable S3 Transfer Acceleration for their buckets and use a distinct URL to access them, such as .s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com2.

The other options are not correct because they either do not provide the lowest latency or are not suitable for the use case. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 and using Amazon CloudFront for the uploads is not correct because this solution is not designed for optimizing uploads, but rather for optimizing downloads. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.CloudFront works by caching the content at edge locations around the world, so that users can access it quickly and easily from anywhere3. Uploading content to Amazon EC2 instances in the Region that is closest to the user and copying the data to Amazon S3 is not correct because this solution adds unnecessary complexity and cost to the process. Amazon EC2 is a computing service that provides scalable and secure virtual servers in the cloud.Users can launch, stop, or terminate EC2 instances as needed, and choose from various instance types, operating systems, and configurations4. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 in the Region that is closest to the user and using multiple distributions of Amazon CloudFront is not correct because this solution is not cost-effective or efficient for the use case. As mentioned above, Amazon CloudFront is a CDN that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.However, creating multiple CloudFront distributions for each Region would incur additional charges and management overhead, and would not be necessary since 90% of the content is consumed within the same Region where it is uploaded3.

The most suitable design change for the company’s application is to request strongly consistent reads for the table. This change will ensure that the requests to the table return the latest data, reflecting the updates from all prior write operations.

Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB supports two types of read consistency: eventually consistent reads and strongly consistent reads.By default, DynamoDB uses eventually consistent reads, unless users specify otherwise1.

Eventually consistent reads are reads that may not reflect the results of a recently completed write operation. The response might not include the changes because of the latency of propagating the data to all replicas. If users repeat their read request after a short time, the response should return the updated data.Eventually consistent reads are suitable for applications that do not require up-to-date data or can tolerate eventual consistency1.

Strongly consistent reads are reads that return a result that reflects all writes that received a successful response prior to the read. Users can request a strongly consistent read by setting the ConsistentRead parameter to true in their read operations, such as GetItem, Query, or Scan.Strongly consistent reads are suitable for applications that require up-to-date data or cannot tolerate eventual consistency1.

The other options are not correct because they do not address the issue of read consistency or are not relevant for the use case. Adding read replicas to the table is not correct because this option is not supported by DynamoDB. Read replicas are copies of a primary database instance that can serve read-only traffic and improve availability and performance.Read replicas are available for some relational database services, such as Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora, but not for DynamoDB2. Using a global secondary index (GSI) is not correct because this option is not related to read consistency. A GSI is an index that has a partition key and an optional sort key that are different from those on the base table.A GSI allows users to query the data in different ways, with eventual consistency3. Requesting eventually consistent reads for the table is not correct because this option is already the default behavior of DynamoDB and does not solve the problem of requests not returning the latest data.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html#how-it-works-ec2

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/ec2/userguide/as-scaling-target-tracking.html#target-tracking-choose-metrics

A target tracking scaling policy is a type of dynamic scaling policy that adjusts the capacity of an Auto Scaling group based on a specified metric and a target value1. A target tracking scaling policy can automatically scale out or scale in the Auto Scaling group to keep the actual metric value at or near the target value1. A target trackingscaling policy issuitable for scenarios where the load on the application changes frequently and unpredictably, such as during working hours2.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use a target tracking scaling policy to scale the Auto Scaling group based on instance CPU utilization. Instance CPU utilization is a common metric that reflects the demand on the application1. The solutions architect should specify a target value that represents the ideal average CPU utilization level for the application, such as 50 percent1. Then, the Auto Scaling group will scale out or scale in to maintain that level of CPU utilization.

Scheduled scaling is a type of scaling policy that performs scaling actions based on a date and time3. Scheduled scaling is suitable for scenarios where the load on the application changes periodically and predictably, such as on weekends2.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should also use scheduled scaling to change the Auto Scaling group minimum, maximum, and desired capacity to zero for weekends. This way, the Auto Scaling group will terminate all instances on weekends when they are not required to operate. The solutions architect should also revert to the default values at the start of the week, so that the Auto Scaling group can resume normal operation.

This option is the most cost-effective and simple way to enable SFTP access to the S3 data lake. AWS Transfer Family is a fully managed service that supports secure file transfers over SFTP, FTPS, and FTPprotocols. You can create an SFTP-enabled server with a public endpoint and associate it with your S3 bucket. You can also use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles and policies to control access to your S3 data lake. The service scales automatically to handle any volume of file transfers and provides high availability and durability. You do not need to provision, manage, or patch any servers or load balancers.

Option B is not correct because Amazon S3 File Gateway is not an SFTP server. It is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides a local file system interface to S3. You can use it to store and retrieve files as objects in S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS and SMB. However, itdoes not support SFTP protocol, and it requires deploying a file gateway appliance on-premises or on EC2.

Option C is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing an EC2 instance in a private subnet and setting up a VPN connection for the new partner. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instance, the VPN connection, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instance to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable.

Option D is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing multiple EC2 instances in a private subnet and placing a NLB in front of them. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instances, the NLB, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instances to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable. References:

What Is AWS Transfer Family?

What Is Amazon S3 File Gateway?

What Is Amazon EC2?

[What Is Amazon Virtual Private Cloud?]

[What Is a Network Load Balancer?]

An Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a type of Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) that distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, Lambda functions, and IP addresses, in multiple Availability Zones1. An ALB can be internet-facing or internal. An internet-facing ALB has a public DNS name that clients can use to send requests over the internet1. An internal ALB has a private DNS name that clients can use to send requests within a VPC1. This solution meets the requirements of the question because:

It allows external internet traffic to connect to the web server on ports 80 and 443, as the ALB listens for requests on these ports and forwards them to the EC2 instance in the private subnet1.

It does not violate the corporate security mandate, as the EC2 instance is launched in a private subnet and does not have a public IPaddress or a route to an internet gateway2.

It reduces the operational overhead, as the ALB is a fully managed service that handles the tasks of load balancing, health checking, scaling, and security1.

These options are the best solutions because they allow the company to run the application with Docker containers in the AWS Cloud using a managed service that scales automatically and does not require any infrastructure to manage. By using AWS Fargate, the company can launch and run containers without having to provision, configure, or scale clusters of EC2 instances. Fargate allocates the right amount of compute resources for each container and scales them up or down as needed. By using Amazon ECS or Amazon EKS, the company can choose the container orchestration platform that suits its needs. Amazon ECS is a fully managed service that integrates with other AWS services and simplifies the deployment and management of containers. Amazon EKS is a managed service that runs Kubernetes on AWS and provides compatibility with existing Kubernetes tools and plugins.

C. Provision an Amazon API Gateway API Connect the API to AWS Lambda to run the containers. This option is not feasible because AWS Lambda does not support running Docker containers directly. Lambda functions are executed in a sandboxed environment that is isolated from other functions and resources. To run Docker containers on Lambda, the company would need to use a custom runtime or a wrapper library that emulates the Docker API, which can introduce additional complexity and overhead.

D. Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with Amazon EC2 worker nodes. This option is not optimal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the containers. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs.

E. Use Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with Amazon EC2 worker nodes. This option is not ideal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the containers. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs.

A cross-account IAM role is a way to grant users from one AWS account access to resources in another AWS account. The cross-account IAM role can have a read-only access policy attached to it, which allows the users to download objects from the S3 buckets without modifying or deleting them. The cross-account IAM role also reduces the operational overhead of managing multiple IAM users and policies in each account. The cross-account IAM role meets all the requirements of the question, while the other options do not. References:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/example-walkthroughs-managing-access-example2.html

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/setting-up-cross-account-amazon-s3-access-with-s3-access-points/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/id_roles_create_for-user_externalid.html

it allows the company to keep the CloudTrail logs and query them at any time. By using the CloudTrail event history in the centralized account, the company can view, filter, and download recent API activity across multiple AWS accounts. By creating an Amazon Athena table from the CloudTrail event history, the company can use a serverless interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in S3 using standard SQL. By querying the CloudTrail logs from Athena, the company can gain insights into user activity and resource changes. References:

Viewing Events with CloudTrail Event History

Querying AWS CloudTrail Logs

Amazon Athena

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cloudwatch-memory-metrics-ec2/

Amazon S3 File Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that enables on-premises applications to seamlessly use Amazon S3 cloud storage. It provides a file interface to Amazon S3 and supports SMB and NFS protocols. It also supports S3 Lifecycle policies that can automaticallytransition data from S3 Standard to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after a specified period of time. This solution will meet the requirements of increasing the company’s available storage space without losing low-latency access to the most recently accessed files and providing file lifecycle management to avoid future storage issues.

AWS Global Accelerator is a networking service that improves the performance and availability of applications for global users. It uses the AWS global network to route user traffic to the optimal endpoint based on performance and health. It also provides static IP addresses that act as a fixed entry point to the applications and support both TCP and UDP protocols1. By using AWS Global Accelerator, the solution can ensure the lowest possible latency for all users.

A. Use AWS Global Accelerator to create an accelerator. Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) behind an accelerator endpoint that uses Global Accelerator integration and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the ALB. This solution will not work, as ALB does not support UDP protocol2.

C. Create an Amazon CloudFront content delivery network (CDN) endpoint. Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) behind the endpoint and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the NLB. Update CloudFront to use the NLB as the origin. This solution will not work, as CloudFront does not support UDP protocol3.

D. Create an Amazon Cloudfront content delivery network (CDN) endpoint. Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) behind the endpoint and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the ALB. Update CloudFront to use the ALB as the origin. This solution will not work, as CloudFront and ALB do not support UDP protocol23.

Reference URL: https://aws.amazon.com/global-accelerator/

Understanding the Requirement: Senior leadership wants a custom dashboard displaying NAT gateway costs daily, starting from the beginning of the current month.

Analysis of Options:

QuickSight with DataSync: While QuickSight is suitable for dashboards, DataSync is not designed for querying and analyzing data reports.

QuickSight with Athena: QuickSight can visualize data queried by Athena, which is designed to analyze data directly from S3.

CloudWatch with DataSync: CloudWatch is primarily for monitoring metrics, not for creating detailed cost analysis dashboards.

CloudWatch with Athena: Similarly, using CloudWatch with Athena does not align well with the requirement for a visual dashboard.

Best Solution for Visualization and Querying:

Amazon QuickSight with Athena: This combination allows for powerful data visualization and querying capabilities. QuickSight can create dynamic dashboards, while Athena efficiently queries the cost and usage report data stored in S3.

Generally, for building a hierarchical relationship model, a graph database such as Amazon Neptune is a better choice. In some cases, however, DynamoDB is a better choice for hierarchical data modeling because of its flexibility, security, performance, and scale.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/dynamodb-hierarchical-data-model/introduction.html

This option is the most cost-effective way to reduce the S3 storage costs in this situation. Incomplete multipart uploads are parts of objects that are not completed or aborted by the application. They consume storage space and incur charges until they are deleted. By enabling an S3 Lifecycle policy that deletes incomplete multipart uploads, you can automatically remove them after a specified period of time (such as one day) and free up the storage space. This will reduce the S3 storage costs and also improve the performance of the application by avoiding unnecessary retries or errors.

Option A is not correct because switching from multipart uploads to Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature that enables faster data transfers to and from S3 by using the AWS edge network. It is useful for improving the upload speed of large objects over long distances, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by adding a data transfer fee for using the feature.

Option C is not correct because configuring S3 inventory to prevent objects from being archived too quickly will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon S3 Inventory is a feature that provides a report of the objects and their metadata in an S3 bucket. It is useful for managing and auditingthe S3 objects, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by generating additional S3 objects for the inventory reports.

Option D is not correct because configuring Amazon CloudFront to reduce the number of objects stored in Amazon S3 will not reduce the S3 storage costs. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that distributes the S3 objects to edge locations for faster and lower latency access. It is useful for improving the download speed and availability of the S3 objects, but it does not affect the storage space or charges. In fact, it may increase the costs by adding a data transfer fee for using the service. References:

Managing your storage lifecycle

Using multipart upload

Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration

Amazon S3 Inventory

What Is Amazon CloudFront?

The solution that will meet the requirements is to deploy AWS Storage Gateway using cached volumes and use Storage Gateway to store data in Amazon S3 while retaining copies of frequently accessed data subsets locally. This solution will allow the company to migrate its storage infrastructure to AWS while minimizing bandwidth costs, as it will only transfer data that is not cached locally. The solution will also allow for immediate retrieval of data at no additional cost, as the cached volumes will provide low-latencyaccess to the most recently used data. The data stored in Amazon S3 will be durable, scalable, and secure.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not meet the requirements or introduce additional costs or complexity. Deploying Amazon S3 Glacier Vault and enabling expedited retrieval will not meet the requirements, as it will incur additional costs for both storage and retrieval. Amazon S3 Glacier is a low-cost storage service for data archivingand backup, but it has longer retrieval times than Amazon S3. Expedited retrieval is a feature that allows faster access to data, but it charges a higher fee per GB retrieved. Provisioned retrieval capacity is a feature that reserves dedicated capacity for expedited retrievals, but it also charges a monthly fee per provisioned capacity unit. Deploying AWS Storage Gateway using stored volumes to store data locally and use Storage Gateway to asynchronously back up point-in-time snapshots of the data to Amazon S3 will not meet the requirements, as it will not migrate the storage infrastructure to AWS, but only create backups. Stored volumes are volumes that store the primary data locally and back up snapshots to Amazon S3. This solution will not reduce the storage capacity needed on-premises, nor will it leverage the benefits of cloud storage. Deploying AWS Direct Connect to connect with the on-premises data center and configuring AWS Storage Gateway to store data locally and use Storage Gateway to asynchronously back up point-in-time snapshots of the data to Amazon S3 will not meet the requirements, as it will also not migrate the storage infrastructure to AWS, but only create backups. AWS Direct Connect is a service that establishes a dedicated network connection between the on-premises data center and AWS, which can reduce network costs and increase bandwidth. However, this solution will also not reduce the storage capacity needed on-premises, nor will it leverage the benefits of cloud storage.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-vpc-connectivity-options/aws-direct-connect-aws-transit-gateway.html

Migrating to Amazon MQ reduces the overhead on the queue management. C and D are dismissed. Deciding between A and B means deciding to go for an AutoScaling group for EC2 or an RDS for Postgress (both multi- AZ). The RDS option has less operational impact, as provide as a service the tools and software required. Consider for instance, the effort to add an additional node like a read replica, to the DB. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazon-mq/latest/developer-guide/active-standby-broker-deployment.htmlhttps://aws.amazon.com/rds/postgresql/

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-loosely-coupled-scalable-c-applications-with-amazon-sqs-and-amazon-sns/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSSimpleQueueService/latest/SQSDeveloperGuide/sqs-dead-letter-queues.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Replication.html

#Aurora.Replication.Replicas Aurora Replicas have two main purposes. You can issue queries to them to scale the read operations for your application. You typically do so by connecting to the reader endpoint of the cluster. That way, Aurora can spread the load for read-only connections across as many Aurora Replicas as you have in the cluster. Aurora Replicas also help to increase availability. If the writer instance in a cluster becomes unavailable, Aurora automatically promotes one of the reader instances to take its place as the new writer.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/Aurora.Overview.html

Service control policies (SCPs) are one type of policy that you can use to manage your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization's access control guidelines. Seehttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_manage_policies_scp.html.

To meet the new requirement of transferring files over a private route, the EC2 instances should be moved to private subnets, which do not have direct access to the internet. This ensures that the traffic for file transfers does not go over the internet. To enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3, a VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 can be created. VPC endpoints allow resources within a VPC to communicate with resources in other services without the traffic being sent overthe internet. By linking the VPC endpoint to the route table for the private subnets, the EC2 instances can access Amazon S3 over a private connection within the VPC.

Many applications, including those built on modern serverless architectures, can have a large number of open connections to the database server and may open and close database connections at a high rate, exhausting database memory and compute resources. Amazon RDS Proxy allows applications to pool and share connections established with the database, improving database efficiency and application scalability.https://aws.amazon.com/id/rds/proxy/

Deploy the application servers by using Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group across multiple Availability Zones. Use an Amazon RDS DB instance in a Multi-AZ configuration. To make an existing application highly available and resilient while avoiding any single points of failure and giving the application the ability to scale to meet user demand, the best solution would be to deploy the application servers using Amazon EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group across multiple Availability Zones and use an Amazon RDS DB instance in a Multi-AZ configuration. By using an Amazon RDS DB instance in a Multi-AZ configuration, the database is automatically replicated across multiple Availability Zones, ensuring that the database is highly available and can withstand the failure of a single Availability Zone. This provides fault tolerance and avoids any single points of failure.

This solution meets the requirement of migrating a Windows-based application that requires the use of a shared Windows file system attached to multiple Amazon EC2 Windows instances that are deployed across multiple Availability Zones. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server provides fully managed shared storage built on Windows Server, and delivers a wide range of data access, data management, and administrative capabilities. It supports the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol and can be mounted to EC2 Windows instances across multiple Availability Zones.

Option A is incorrect because AWS Storage Gateway in volume gateway mode provides cloud-backed storage volumes that can be mounted as iSCSI devices from on-premises application servers, but it does not support SMB protocol or EC2 Windows instances. Option C is incorrect because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides a scalable and elastic NFS file system for Linux-based workloads, but it does not support SMB protocol or EC2 Windows instances. Option D is incorrect because Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) providespersistent block storage volumes for use with EC2 instances, but it does not support SMB protocol or attaching multiple instances to the same volume.

By using an SQS queue and Lambda, the solutions architect can decouple the API front end from the processing microservices and improve the overall scalability and availability of the system. The SQS queue acts as a buffer, allowing the API front end to continue accepting user requests even if the processing microservices are experiencing high workloads or are temporarilyunavailable. The Lambda function can then retrieve requests from the SQS queue and write them to DynamoDB, ensuring that all user requests are stored and processed. This approach allows the company to scale the processing microservices independently from the API front end, ensuring that the API remains available to users even during periods of high demand.

https://aws.amazon.com/cn/blogs/compute/cost-optimization-and-resilience-eks-with-spot-instances/

ElastiCache, enhances the performance of web applications by quickly retrieving information from fully-managed in-memory data stores. It utilizes Memcached and Redis, and manages to considerably reduce the time your applications would, otherwise, take to read data from disk-based databases. Amazon CloudFront supports dynamic content from HTTP and WebSocket protocols, which are based on the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) protocol. Common use cases include dynamic API calls, web pages and web applications, as well as an application's static files such as audio and images. It also supports on-demand media streaming over HTTP. AWS Global Accelerator supports both User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and TCP-based protocols. It is commonly used for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming, IoT and voice over IP. It is also good for HTTP use cases that need static IP addresses or fast regional failover

Amazon Aurora is a fully managed, scalable, and highly available relational database service that is compatible with PostgreSQL. Migrating the database to Amazon Aurora would reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the database infrastructure and allow the company to focus on building and scaling the application. AWS Fargate is a fully managed container orchestrationservice that enables users to run containers without the need to manage the underlying EC2 instances. By using AWS Fargate with Amazon Elastic Container Service(Amazon ECS), the solutions architect can improve the scalability and efficiency of the web application and reduce the operational overhead of maintaining the underlying infrastructure.

EC2 instance Savings Plan saves 72% while Compute Savings Plans saves 66%. But according to link, it says "Compute Savings Plans provide the most flexibility and help to reduce your costs by up to 66%. These plans automatically apply to EC2 instance usage regardless of instance family, size, AZ, region, OS or tenancy, and also apply to Fargate and Lambda usage." EC2 instance Savings Plans are not applied to Fargate or Lambda

https://www.omnicalculator.com/other/data-transfer

AWS Global Accelerator and Amazon CloudFront are separate services that use the AWS global network and its edge locations around the world. CloudFront improves performance for both cacheable content (such as images and videos) and dynamic content (such as API acceleration and dynamic site delivery). Global Accelerator improves performance for a wide range of applications over TCP or UDP by proxying packets at the edge to applications running in one or more AWS Regions. Global Accelerator is a good fit for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming (UDP), IoT (MQTT), or Voice over IP, as well as for HTTP use cases that specifically require static IP addresses or deterministic, fast regional failover. Both services integrate with AWS Shield for DDoS protection.

You can use CloudFront to deliver video on demand (VOD) or live streaming video using any HTTP origin. One way you can set up video workflows in the cloud is by using CloudFront together with AWS Media Services.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/on-demand-streaming-video.html

Composite alarms determine their states by monitoring the states of other alarms. You can **use composite alarms to reduce alarm noise**. For example, you can create a composite alarm where the underlying metric alarms go into ALARM when they meet specific conditions. You then canset up your composite alarm to go into ALARM and send you notifications when the underlying metric alarms go into ALARM by configuring the underlying metric alarms never to take actions. Currently, composite alarms can take the following actions:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/monitoring/Create_Composite_Alarm.html

This solution meets the requirements of running a gaming application that transmits data by using UDP packets and scaling out and in as traffic increases and decreases. A Network Load Balancer can handle millions of requests per second while maintaining high throughput at ultra low latency, and it supports both TCP and UDP protocols. An Auto Scaling group can automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances based on the demand and the scaling policies.

Option B is incorrect because an Application Load Balancer does not support UDP protocol, only HTTP and HTTPS. Option C is incorrect because Amazon Route 53 is a DNS service that can route traffic based on different policies, but it does not provide load balancing or scaling capabilities. Option D is incorrect because a NAT instance is used to enable instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet or other AWS services, but it does not provide load balancing or scaling capabilities.

The correct solution is to create an Object Lambda Access Point and an AWS Lambda function that redacts the PII when the function reads the file. This way, the company can use the S3 Object Lambda feature to modify the S3 object content on the fly, without creating a copy or changing the originalobject. The external service provider can access the Object Lambda Access Point and get the redacted version of the file. This solution has the least operational overhead because it does not require any additional storage, processing, or synchronization. The solution also scales automatically with the number of customer conversations and the demand from the external service provider. The other options are incorrect because:

Option B is using a batch process on an EC2 instance to read, redact, and write the files to a different S3 bucket. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the EC2 instance, the batch process, and the additional S3 bucket. It also introduces latency and inconsistency between the original and the redacted files.

Option C is using a web application on an EC2 instance to present, redact, and download the files. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the EC2 instance, the web application, and the download process. It also exposes the original files to the web application, which increases the risk of leaking the PII.

Option D is using a DynamoDB table and a Lambda function to store the non-PII data from the files. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the DynamoDB table, the Lambda function, and the data transformation. It also changes the format and the structure of the original files, which may affect the quality control process.

This solution meets the requirements of moving the files automatically, running Lambda functions on the copied data, and sending the data files to SageMaker Pipelines with the least operational overhead. S3 replication can copy the files from the initial S3 bucket to the analysis S3 bucket as they arrive. The analysis S3 bucket can send event notifications to Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) when an object is created.EventBridge can trigger Lambda and SageMaker Pipelines as targets for the ObjectCreated rule. Lambda can run pattern-matching code on the copied data, and SageMaker Pipelines can execute a pipeline with the data files.

Option A is incorrect because creating a Lambda function to copy the files to the analysis S3 bucket is not necessary when S3 replication can do that automatically. It also adds operational overhead to manage the Lambda function. Option B is incorrect because creating a Lambda function to copy the files to the analysis S3 bucket is not necessary when S3 replication can do that automatically. It also adds operational overhead to manage the Lambda function. Option C is incorrect because using S3 event notification with multiple destinations can result in throttling or delivery failures if there are too many events.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/top-10-performance-tuning-tips-for-amazon-athena/

This solution meets the requirements of measuring the effectiveness of marketing campaigns by performing batch processing on csv files of sales data and storing the results in an Amazon S3 bucket once every hour. An AWS duo ETL process can use services such as AWS Glue or AWS Data Pipeline to extract data from S3, transform it into a more efficient format such as Apache Parquet, and load it back into S3. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the query performance and reliability of Athena by reducing the amount of data scanned, improving compression ratio, and enabling predicate pushdown.

https://aws.amazon.com/dynamodb/dax/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/distribution-web-awswaf.html

Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda scales automatically based on the incoming requests, but it may take some time to initialize new instances of your function if there is a sudden increase in demand. This may result in high latency or cold starts for your API. To avoid this, you can use provisioned concurrency, which ensures that your function is initialized and ready to respond at any time. Provisioned concurrency also helps you achieve consistent low latency for your API by reducing the impact of scaling on performance. References:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/http-api-develop-integrations-lambda.htmlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/configuration-concurrency.html

1. database shows no signs of being overloaded. CPU, memory, and disk access metrics are all low==>A and C out. We cannot only add nodes instance or add read replica, because database workload is totally fine, very low. 2. "least operational overhead"==>B out, because b need to configure lambda. 3. ROS proxy: Shares infrequently used connections; High availability with failover; Drives increased efficiency==>proxy can leverage failover to redirect traffic from timeout rds instance to healthy rds instance. So D is right.

We recommend that you use On-Demand Instances for applications with short-term, irregular workloads that cannot be interrupted.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-on-demand-instances.html

If you have resources in multiple Availability Zones and they share one NAT gateway, and if the NAT gateway’s Availability Zone is down, resources in the other Availability Zones lose internet access. To create an Availability Zone-independent architecture, create a NAT gateway in each Availability Zone and configure your routing to ensure that resources use the NATgateway in the same Availability Zone.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-nat-gateway.html#nat-gateway-basics

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sns/latest/dg/sns-dead-letter-queues.html

This solution meets the requirements of saving money on storage while keeping the most accessed files readily available for the users. S3 Lifecycle policy can automatically move objects from one storage class to another based on predefined rules. S3 Standard-IA is a lower-cost storage class for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It is suitable for ringtones older than 90 days that are downloaded infrequently.

Option A is incorrect because configuring S3 Standard-IA for the initial storage tier of the objects can incur higher costs for frequent access and retrieval fees. Option B is incorrect because moving the files to S3 Intelligent-Tiering can incur additional monitoring and automation fees that may not be necessary for ringtones older than 90 days. Option C is incorrect because using S3 inventory to manage objects and move them to S3 Standard-IA can be complex and time-consuming, and it does not provide automatic cost savings.

Amazon S3 is cheapest and can be accessed from anywhere.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/dns-failover-types.html

it allows the company to encrypt the Kubernetes secrets object in the EKS cluster with the least operational overhead. By enabling secrets encryption in the EKS cluster, the company can use AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) to generate and manage encryption keys for encrypting and decrypting secrets at rest. This is a simple and secure way to protect sensitive information in EKS clusters. References:

Encrypting Kubernetes secrets with AWS KMS

Kubernetes Secrets

To achieve high availability for an application that runs on EC2 instances, the application should be deployed across multiple Availability Zones and use a load balancer to distribute traffic. An Auto Scaling group can be used to launch and manage EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones and perform health checks on them. A Network Load Balancer can be used to handle transport layer traffic to the EC2 instances.

You need S3 to be able to archive the logs after one month. Cannot do that with CloudWatch Logs.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cloudfront-access-to-amazon-s3/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html#private-content-restricting-access-to-s3-overview

1. lowest possible latency + node to node ==> cluster placement(must be within one AZ), so C, D out

2. For EBS Multi-Attach, up to 16 instances can be attached to a single volume==>we have 16 linux instance==>more close to A

3. "need a shared block device volume"==>EBS Multi-attach is Block Storage whereas EFS is File Storage==> B out

4. EFS automatically replicates data within and across 3 AZ==>we use cluster placement so all EC2 are within one AZ.

5. EBS Multi-attach volumes can be used for clients within a single AZ.

https://repost.aws/questions/QUK2RANw1QTKCwpDUwCCI72A/efs-vs-ebs-mult-attach

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/04/announcing-s3-one-zone-infrequent-access-a-new-amazon-s3-storage-class/?nc1=h_ls

Q: What does Amazon RDS manage on my behalf?

Amazon RDS manages the work involved in setting up a relational database: from provisioning the infrastructure capacity you request to installing the database software. Once your database is up and running, Amazon RDS automates common administrative tasks such as performing backups and patching the software that powers your database. With optional Multi-AZ deployments, Amazon RDS also manages synchronous data replication across Availability Zones with automatic failover.

https://aws.amazon.com/rds/faqs/

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda scales automatically based on the incoming requests, but it may take some time to initialize new instances of your function if there is a sudden increase in demand.This may result in high latency or cold starts for your application. To avoid this, you can use provisioned concurrency, which ensures that your function is initialized and ready to respond at any time. You can also set up a scheduled scaling policy that increases the provisioned concurrency before employees begin to use the application each day, and decreases it when the demand is low.References:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/configuration-concurrency.html

Service Control Policies (SCP): SCPs are an integral part of AWS Organizations and allow you to set fine-grained permissions on the organizational units (OUs) within your AWS Organization. SCPs provide central control over the maximum permissions that can be granted to member accounts, including the root user. Denying Access to Billing Information: By creating an SCP and attaching it to the root OU, you can explicitly deny access to billing information for all accounts within the organization. SCPs can be used to restrict access to various AWS services and actions, including billing-related services. Granular Control: SCPs enable you to define specific permissions and restrictions at the organizational unit level. By denying access to billing information at the root OU, you can ensure that no member accounts, including root users, have access to the billing information.

it allows the company to migrate its data from the on-premises location to an Amazon S3 bucket and automatically validate the integrity of the data after the transfer. By deploying an AWS DataSync agent on premises, the company can use a fully managed data transfer service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data to and from AWS. By configuring the DataSync agent to perform the online data transfer to an S3 bucket, the company can take advantage of DataSync’s features, such as encryption, compression, bandwidth throttling, and data validation. DataSync automatically verifies data integrity at both source and destination after each transfer task. References:

AWS DataSync

Deploying an Agent for AWS DataSync

How AWS DataSync Works

Dynamic scaling is a type of autoscaling that automatically adjusts the number of EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group based on demand or load. It uses CloudWatch alarms to trigger scaling actions when a specified metric crosses a threshold. It can scale out (addinstances) or scale in (remove instances) as needed1. By using dynamic scaling, the solution can maintain application performance during sudden traffic increases most cost-effectively.

A. Use manual scaling to change the size of the Auto Scaling group. This solution will not meet the requirement of maintaining application performance during sudden traffic increases, as manual scaling requires users to manually increase or decrease the number of instances through a CLI or console. It does not respond automatically to changes in demand or load2.

B. Use predictive scaling to change the size of the Auto Scaling group. This solution will not meet the requirement of most cost-effectiveness, as predictive scaling uses machine learning and artificial intelligence tools to evaluate traffic loads and anticipate when more or fewer resources are needed. It performs scheduled scaling actions based on the prediction, which may not matchthe actual demand or load at any given time. Predictive scaling is more suitable for scenarios where there are predictable traffic patterns or known changes in traffic loads3.

D. Use schedule scaling to change the size of the Auto Scaling group. This solution will not meet the requirement of maintaining application performance during sudden traffic increases, as schedule scaling performs scaling actions at specific times that users schedule. It does not respond automatically to changes in demand or load. Schedule scaling is more suitable for scenarios where there are predictable traffic drops or spikes at specific times of the day.

Reference URL: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/ec2/userguide/as-scale-based-on-demand.html

A -> We can configure CloudFront to require HTTPS from clients (enhanced security) https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/using-https-viewers-to-cloudfront.html D - > storing static website on S3 provides scalability and less operational overhead, then configuration of Application LB and EC2 instances (hence E is out)

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse service in the cloud. You can start with just a few hundred gigabytes of data and scale to a petabyte or more. This allows you to use your data to gain new insights for your business and customers. The first step to create a data warehouse is to launch a set of nodes, called an Amazon Redshift cluster. After you provision your cluster, you can upload your data set and then perform data analysis queries. Regardless of the size of the data set, Amazon Redshift offers fast query performance using the same SQL-based tools and business intelligence applications that you use today.

 it allows the EC2 instances to read and write rapidly and concurrently to shared storage across two Availability Zones. Amazon EFS provides a scalable, elastic, and highly available file system that can be mounted from multiple EC2 instances. Amazon EFS supports high levels of throughput and IOPS, and consistent low latencies. Amazon EFS also supports NFSv4 lock upgrading and downgrading, which enables high levels of concurrency. References:

Amazon EFS Features

Using Amazon EFS with Amazon EC2

"An active, long-running transaction can slow the process of creating the read replica. We recommend that you wait for long-running transactions to complete before creating a read replica. If you create multiple read replicas in parallel from the same source DB instance, Amazon RDS takes only one snapshot at the start of the first create action. When creating a read replica, there are a few things to consider. First, you must enable automatic backups on the source DB instance by setting the backup retention period to a value other than 0. This requirement also applies to a read replica that is the source DB instance for another read replica"https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_ReadRepl.html

This solution meets the requirements because it requires the least amount of infrastructure management and guarantees exactly-once delivery for application messaging. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You only pay for the compute time you consume.Lambda scales automatically with the size of your workload. Amazon SQS FIFO queues are designed to ensure that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent. FIFO queues have high availability and deliver messages in a strict first-in, first-out order. You can use Amazon SQS to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. References: AWS Lambda, Amazon SQS FIFO queues

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to decouple the analytics software from the user requests and scale the EC2 instances dynamically based on the demand. By using Amazon SQS, the company can create a queue that stores the user requests and acts as a buffer between the users and the analytics software. This way, the software can process the requests at its own pace without losing any data or overloading the EC2 instances. By using EC2 Auto Scaling, the company cancreate an Auto Scaling group that launches or terminates EC2 instances automatically based on the size of the queue. This way, the company can ensure that there are enough instances to handle the load and optimize the cost and performance of the system. By updating the software to read from the queue, the company can enable the analytics software to consume the requests from the queue and process the data from Amazon S3.

A. Create a copy of the instance Place all instances behind an Application Load Balancer. This option is not optimal because it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An Application Load Balancer can distribute the incoming traffic across multiple instances, but it cannot scale the instances based on the load or reduce the processing time of the analytics software. Moreover, this option can incur additional costs for the load balancer and the extra instances.

B. Create an S3 VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 Update the software to reference the endpoint. This option is not effective because it does not solve the issue of the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An S3 VPC endpoint can enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3 without going through the internet, which can improve the network performance and security. However, it cannot reduce the processing time of the analytics software or scale the instances based on the load.

C. Stop the EC2 instances. Modify the instance type to one with a more powerful CPU and more memory. Restart the instances. This option is not scalable because it does not account for the variability of the user load. Changing the instance type to a more powerful one can improve the performance of the analytics software, but it cannot adjust the number of instances based on the demand. Moreover, this option can increase the cost of the system and cause downtime during the instance modification.

API Gateway + Lambda is the perfect solution for modern applications with serverless architecture.

Amazon EFS is a fully managed file system that can be mounted by multiple Linux instances in AWS and on premises through native protocols such as NFS and SMB. Amazon EFS has no minimum size requirements and can scale up and down automatically as files are added andremoved. Amazon EFS also supports high availability and durability by allowing multiple mount targets in different Availability Zones within a region. Amazon EFS meets all the requirements of the question, while the other options do not. References:

https://aws.amazon.com/efs/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/performance-efficiency-pillar/storage-architecture-selection.html

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/from-on-premises-to-aws-hybrid-cloud-architecture-for-network-file-shares/

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda can be used to tag resources with the cost center ID of the user who created the resource, by querying the RDS database that maps users to cost centers. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus service that enables event-driven architectures. EventBridge can be configured to react to AWS CloudTrail events, which are recorded API calls made by or on behalf of the AWS account. EventBridge can invoke the Lambda function when a resource is created in the specific AWS account, passing the user identity and resource information as parameters. This solution will meet the requirements, as it enables automatic tagging of resources based on the user and cost center mapping.

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/06/rds-storage-auto-scaling/

Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that can decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. By writing orders to an SQS queue, the application can handle spikes in traffic without losing any orders. The EC2 instances in an Auto Scaling group can read from the SQS queue and process orders into the database at a steady pace. The Application Load Balancer can distribute the loadacross the EC2 instances andprovide health checks. This solution meets all the requirements of the question, while the other options do not. References:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/reliability-pillar/welcome.html

https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/serverless/

https://aws.amazon.com/sqs/

Application availability: NLB cannot assure the availability of the application. This is because it bases its decisions solely on network and TCP-layer variables and has no awareness of the application at all. Generally, NLB determines availability based on the ability of a server to respond to ICMP ping or to correctly complete the three-way TCP handshake. ALB goes much deeper and is capable of determining availability based on not only a successful HTTP GET of a particular page but also the verification that the content is as was expected based on the input parameters.

A VPC peering connection is a networking connection between two VPCs that enables users to route traffic between them using private IP addresses. Instances in either VPC can communicate with each other as if they are within the same network. A VPC peering connection can be createdbetween VPCs in the same or different AWS accounts and Regions1. By configuring a VPC peering connection between VPC A and VPC B, the solution can provide the required access most securely.

A. Create a DB instance security group that allows all traffic from the public IP address of the application server in VPC A. This solution willnot provide the required access most securely, as it involves exposing the DB instance to the public internet and relying on a single IP address for access control2.

C. Make the DB instance publicly accessible. Assign a public IP address to the DB instance. This solution will not provide the required access most securely, as it involves exposing the DB instance to the public internet and allowing any source to connect to it2.

D. Launch an EC2 instance with an Elastic IP address into VPC B. Proxy all requests through the new EC2 instance. This solution will not provide the required access most securely, as it involves creating an additional resource and configuring a proxy server that may introduce latency and complexity3.

Reference URL: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/peering/what-is-vpc-peering.html

AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides an easy and quick way to deploy, manage, and scale applications. It supports a variety of platforms, including Java and Apache Tomcat. By using Elastic Beanstalk, the solutions architect can upload the Java application and configure the environment to run Apache Tomcat.

The most suitable solution for the company’s requirements is to enable Default Host Configuration Management in Systems Manager to manage the EC2 instances. This solution will allow the company to patch the EC2 instances without disrupting the running applications and without manually creating or modifying IAM roles or users.

Default Host Configuration Management is a feature of AWS Systems Manager that enables Systems Manager to manage EC2 instances automatically as managed instances. A managed instance is an EC2 instance that is configured for use with Systems Manager. The benefits of managing instances with Systems Manager include the following:

Connect to EC2 instances securely using Session Manager.

Perform automated patch scans using Patch Manager.

View detailed information about instances using Systems Manager Inventory.

Track and manage instances using Fleet Manager.

Keep SSM Agent up to date automatically.

Default Host Configuration Management makes it possible to manage EC2 instances without having to manually create an IAM instance profile. Instead, Default Host Configuration Management creates and applies a default IAM role to ensure that Systems Manager has permissions to manage all instances in the Region and account where it is activated.If thepermissions provided are not sufficient for the use case, the default IAM role can be modified or replaced with a custom role1.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Creating a new IAM role, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the new IAM role, and attaching the new IAM role and the existing IAM role to the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM roles, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.The AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy is a managed policy that grants permissions for Systems Manager core functionality2. Creating an IAM user, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the IAM user, and configuring Systems Manager to use the IAM user to manage the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM users, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.An IAM user is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a single person or application3. Removing the existing policies from the existing IAM role and adding the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the existing IAM role is not correct because this solution may disrupt the running applications that rely on the existing policies for accessing RDS databases.An IAM role is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a service or entity4.

Consider using the default aws/s3 KMS key if: You're uploading or accessing S3 objects using AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) principals that are in the same AWS account as the AWS KMS key. You don't want to manage policies for the KMS key. Consider using a customer managed key if: You want to create, rotate, disable, or define access controls for the key. You want to grant cross-account access to your S3 objects. You can configure the policy of a customer managed key to allow access from another account.https://repost.aws/knowledge-center/s3-object-encryption-keys

it allows the company to reduce the data output costs for accessing Amazon S3 from Amazon EC2 instances in a VPC. By provisioning a VPC gateway endpoint, the company can enable private connectivity between the VPC and S3. By configuring the route table for the private subnet to use the gateway endpoint as the route for all S3 traffic, the company can avoid using a NAT gateway, which charges for data processing and data transfer. References:

VPC Endpoints for Amazon S3

VPC Endpoints Pricing

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/vpc-endpoints-dynamodb.html

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2019/09/amazon-eks-adds-support-to-assign-iam-permissions-to-kubernetes-service-accounts/

This solution meets the requirements of a disaster recovery solution to back up the data that is generated by an analytics application, stored in JSON format, and must be accessible in milliseconds if it is needed. Amazon S3 Standard is a durable and scalable storage class for frequently accessed data. It can store any amount of data and provide high availability and performance. It can also support millisecond access time for data retrieval.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon OpenSearch Service (Amazon Elasticsearch Service) is a search and analytics service that can index and query data, but it is not a backup solution for data stored in JSON format. Option B is incorrect because Amazon S3 Glacier is a low-cost storage class for data archiving and long-term backup, but it does not support millisecond access time fordata retrieval. Option D is incorrect because Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL is a relational database service that can store and query structured data, but it is not a backup solution for data stored in JSON format.

Moving the catalog to an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system provides both high availability and durability. Amazon EFS is a fully-managed, highly-available, and durable file system that is built to scale on demand. With Amazon EFS, the catalog data can be storedand accessed from multiple EC2 instances in different availability zones, ensuring high availability. Also, Amazon EFS automatically stores files redundantly within and across multiple availability zones, making it a durable storage option.

AWS uses the existing infrastructure of a VPC to create a VPC peering connection; it is neither a gateway nor a VPN connection, and does not rely on a separate piece of physical hardware. There is no single point of failure for communication or a bandwidth bottleneck.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/peering/what-is-vpc-peering.html

By placing the JSON documents in an S3 bucket, the documents will be stored in a highly durable and scalable object storage service. The use of AWS Lambda allows the company to run their Python code to process the documents as they arrive in the S3 bucket without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure. This also allows for horizontal scalability, as AWS Lambda will automatically scale the number of instances of the function based on the incoming rate of requests. The results can be stored in an Amazon Aurora DB cluster, which is a fully-managed, high-performance database service that is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. This will provide the necessary durability and scalability for the results of the processing.

https://aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora/

These answers are correct because they meet the requirements of creating a new DB instance from the most recent backup and using a MySQL-compatible edition of Amazon Aurora to host the DB instance. You can import the RDS snapshot directly into Aurora if the MySQL DB instance and the Aurora DB cluster are running the same version of MySQL. For example, you can restore a MySQL version 5.6 snapshot directly to Aurora MySQL version 5.6, but you can’t restore a MySQL version 5.6 snapshot directly to Aurora MySQL version 5.7. This method is simple and requires the fewest number of steps. You can upload the database dump to Amazon S3 and then import the database dump into Aurora if the MySQL DB instance and the Aurora DB cluster are running different versions of MySQL. For example, you can import a MySQLversion 5.6 database dump into Aurora MySQL version 5.7, but you can’t restore a MySQL version 5.6 snapshot directly to Aurora MySQL version 5.7. This method is more flexible and allows you to migrate across different versions of MySQL.

You can use metric streams to continually stream CloudWatch metrics to a destination of your choice, with near-real-time delivery and low latency. One of the use cases is Data Lake: create a metric stream and direct it to an Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream that delivers your CloudWatch metrics to a data lake such as Amazon S3.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/monitoring/CloudWatch-Metric-Streams.html

To reduce the cost of running the tests without reducing the compute and memory attributes of the Amazon RDS for MySQL DB instance, the development team can stop the instance when tests are completed and restart it when required. Stopping the DB instance when not in use can help save costs because customers are only charged for storage while the DB instance is stopped. During this time, automated backups and automated DB instance maintenance are suspended.When the instance is restarted, it retains the same configurations, security groups, and DB parameter groups as when it was stopped.

https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/lustre/

Amazon FSx has native support for Windows file system features and for the industry-standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol to access file storage over a network.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/what-is.html

To restrict inbound traffic from the ALB to the EC2 instances, the security group for the EC2 instances should only allow traffic that comes from the security group for the ALB. This way, the EC2 instances can only receive requests from the ALB and not from any other source inside or outside the private subnet.

To protect data in an S3 bucket from accidental deletion, versioning should be enabled, which enables you to preserve, retrieve, and restore every version of every object in an S3 bucket. Additionally, enabling MFA (multi-factor authentication) Delete on the S3 bucket adds an extra layer of protection by requiring an authentication token in addition to the user's access keys to delete objects in the bucket.

You might want to use Transfer Acceleration on a bucket for various reasons, including the following:

You have customers that upload to a centralized bucket from all over the world.

You transfer gigabytes to terabytes of data on a regular basis across continents.

You are unable to utilize all of your available bandwidth over the Internet when uploading to Amazon S3.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/transfer-acceleration.html

https://aws.amazon.com/s3/transfer-acceleration/#:~:text=S3%20Transfer%20Acceleration%20(S3TA)%20reduces,to%20S3%20for%20remote%20applications:

"Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration can speed up content transfers to and from Amazon S3 by as much as 50-500% for long-distance transfer of larger objects. Customers who have either web or mobile applications with widespread users or applications hosted far away from their S3 bucket can experience long and variable upload and download speeds over the Internet"

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/mpuoverview.html

"Improved throughput - You can upload parts in parallel to improve throughput."

To meet the requirements of the company to have access to both AWS and on-premises file storage with minimum latency, a hybrid cloud architecture can be used. One solution is to deploy and configure Amazon FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, which provides fully managed Windows file servers. The on-premises file data can be moved to the FSx File Gateway, which can act as a bridge between on-premises and AWS file storage. The cloud workloads can be configured to use FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, while the on-premises workloads can be configured to use the FSx File Gateway. This solution minimizes operational overhead and requires no significant changes to the existing file access patterns. The connectivity between on-premises and AWS can be established using an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/secretsmanager/latest/userguide/create_database_secret.html

To meet the requirements of detecting and alerting the administrators when PII is shared and automating remediation with the least development effort, the best approach would be to use Amazon S3 bucket as a secure transfer point and scan the objects in the bucket with Amazon Macie. Amazon Macie is a fully managed data security and data privacy service that uses machine learning and pattern matching to discover and protect sensitive data stored in Amazon S3. It can be used to classify sensitive data, monitor access to sensitive data, and automate remediation actions.

In this scenario, after uploading the files to the Amazon S3 bucket, the objects can be scanned for PII by Amazon Macie, and if it detects any PII, it can trigger an Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) notification to alert the administrators to remove the objects containing PII. This approach requires the least development effort, as Amazon Macie already has pre-built data classification rules that can detect PII in various formats.

Hence, option B is the correct answer.

"For archive data that needs immediate access, such as medical images, news media assets, or genomics data, choose the S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval storage class, an archive storage class that delivers the lowest cost storage with milliseconds retrieval. For archive data that does not require immediate access but needs the flexibility to retrieve large sets of data at no cost, such as backup or disaster recovery use cases, choose S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval (formerly S3 Glacier), with retrieval in minutes or free bulk retrievals in 5-12 hours."https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/amazon-s3-glacier-instant-retrieval-storage-class/

An Auto Scaling group is a collection of EC2 instances that share similar characteristics and can be scaled in or out automatically based on demand. An Auto Scaling group can have a scheduled action, which is a configuration that tells the group to scale to a specific size at a specific time. This way, the company can scale up to six instances each Friday evening to handle the increased workload, and scale down to two instances at other times to save costs. This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it does not require manual intervention or custom scripts.

"Typically, you configure buckets to be Requester Pays buckets when you want to share data but not incur charges associated with others accessing the data. For example, you might use Requester Pays buckets when making available large datasets, such as zip code directories, reference data, geospatial information, or web crawling data."https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/RequesterPaysBuckets.html

https://www.learnaws.org/2020/12/13/aws-rds-proxy-deep-dive/

RDS proxy can improve application availability in such a situation by waiting for the new database instance to be functional and maintaining any requests received from the application during this time. The end result is that the application is more resilient to issues with the underlying database.

This will enable solution to hold data till the time DB comes back to normal. RDS proxy is to optimally utilize the connection between Lambda and DB. Lambda can open multipleconnection concurrently which can be taxing on DB compute resources, hence RDS proxy was introduced to manage and leverage these connections efficiently.

using AWS ECS on AWS Fargate since they requirements are for scalability and availability without having to provision and manage the underlying infrastructure to run the containerized workload.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/userguide/what-is-fargate.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/filegateway/latest/filefsxw/what-is-file-fsxw.html

To meet the requirements of the company to have access to both AWS and on-premises file storage with minimum latency, a hybrid cloud architecture can be used. One solution is to deploy and configure Amazon FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, which provides fully managed Windows file servers. The on-premises file data can be moved to the FSx File Gateway, which can act as a bridge between on-premises and AWS file storage. The cloudworkloads can be configured to use FSx for Windows File Server on AWS, while the on-premises workloads can be configured to use the FSx File Gateway. This solution minimizes operational overhead and requires no significant changes to the existing file access patterns. The connectivity between on-premises and AWS can be established using an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection.

https://aws.amazon.com/shield/faqs/

To ensure that Amazon S3 buckets do not have unauthorized configuration changes, a solutions architect should turn on AWS Config with the appropriate rules. AWS Config is a service that allows users to audit and assess their AWS resource configurations for compliance with industry standards and internal policies. It provides a detailed view of the resources and their configurations, including information on how the resources are related to each other. By turning on AWS Config with the appropriate rules, users can identify and remediate unauthorized configuration changes to their Amazon S3 buckets.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/control-access-to-aws-resources-by-using-the-aws-organization-of-iam-principals/

To ensure that orders are processed in the order that they are received, the best solution is to use an Amazon SQS FIFO (First-In-First-Out) queue. This type of queue maintains the exact order in which messages are sent and received. In this case, the application can send information about new orders to an Amazon API Gateway REST API, which can then use an API Gateway integration to send a message to an Amazon SQS FIFO queue for processing. The queue can then be configured to invoke an AWS Lambda function to perform the necessary processing on each order. This ensures that orders are processed in the exact order in which they are received.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/privatelink-interface-endpoints.html#types-of-vpc-endpoints-for-s3

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-endpoints-s3.html

The correct answer is Option D. Deploy an S3 VPC gateway endpoint into the VPC and attach an endpoint policy that allows access to the S3 buckets. By deploying an S3 VPC gateway endpoint, the application can access the S3 buckets over a private network connection within the VPC, eliminating the need for data transfer over the internet. This can help reduce data transfer fees as well as improve the performance of the application. The endpoint policy can be used to specify which S3 buckets the application has access to.

https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-use-DynamoDB-for-storing-metadata-for-Amazon-S3-objects

This solution meets the requirements of scalability, performance, and availability. AWS Lambda can process the photos in parallel and scale up or down automatically depending on the demand. Amazon S3 can store the photos and metadata reliably and durably, and provide high availability and low latency. DynamoDB can store the metadata efficiently and provide consistent performance. This solution also reduces the cost and complexity of managing EC2 instances and EBS volumes.

Option A is incorrect because storing the photos in DynamoDB is not a good practice, as it can increase the storage cost and limit the throughput. Option B is incorrect because Kinesis Data Firehose is not designed for processing photos, but for streaming data to destinations such as S3 or Redshift. Option D is incorrect because increasing the number of EC2 instances and usingProvisioned IOPS SSD volumes does not guarantee scalability, as it depends on the load balancer and the application code. It also increases the cost and complexity of managing the infrastructure.

Amazon S3 is a highly scalable and durable object storage service that can store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web1. Users can configure the application to upload images directly from each user’s browser to Amazon S3 through the use of a presigned URL. A presigned URL is a URL that gives access to an object in an S3 bucket for a limited time and with a specificaction, such as uploading an object2. Users can generate a presigned URL programmatically using the AWS SDKs or AWS CLI. By using a presigned URL, users can reduce coupling within the application and improve website performance, as they do not need to send the images to the web server first.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that runs code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources3. Users can configure S3 Event Notifications to invoke an AWS Lambda function when an image is uploaded. S3 EventNotifications is a feature that allows users to receive notifications when certain events happen in an S3 bucket, such as object creation or deletion. Users can configure S3 Event Notifications to invoke a Lambda function that resizes the image and stores it back in the same or a different S3 bucket. This way, users can offload the image resizing task from the web server to Lambda.

(https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront

Amazon S3 is a highly scalable and durable object storage service that can store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web1. Users can configure theapplication to upload images directly from each user’s browser to Amazon S3 through the use of a presigned URL. A presigned URL is a URL that gives access to an object in an S3 bucket for a limited time and with a specific action, such as uploading an object2. Users can generate a presigned URL programmatically using the AWS SDKs or AWS CLI. By using a presigned URL, users can reduce coupling within the application and improve website performance, as they do not need to send the images to the web server first.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that runs code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources3. Users can configure S3 Event Notifications to invoke an AWS Lambda function when an image is uploaded. S3 Event Notifications is a feature that allows users to receive notifications when certain events happen in an S3 bucket, such as object creation or deletion. Users can configure S3 Event Notifications to invoke a Lambda function that resizes the image and stores it back in the same or a different S3 bucket. This way, users can offload the image resizing task from the web server to Lambda.

"Security groups create an outbound rule for every inbound rule." Not completely right. Statefull does NOT mean that if you create an inbound (or outbound) rule, it will create an outbound (or inbound) rule. What it does mean is: suppose you create an inbound rule on port 443 for the X ip. When a request enters on port 443 from X ip, it will allow traffic out for that request in the port 443. However, if you look at the outbound rules, there will not be any outbound rule on port 443 unless explicitly create it. In ACLs, which are stateless, you would have to create an inbound rule to allow incoming requests and an outbound rule to allow your application responds to those incoming requests.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/VPC_SecurityGroups.html#SecurityGroupRules

https://aws.amazon.com/es/blogs/big-data/real-time-analytics-with-amazon-redshift-streaming-ingestion/

The solution that meets the requirements with the least operational overhead is to migrate the web tier to Amazon EC2 instances in public subnets, migrate the application tier to EC2 instances in private subnets, and migrate the database tier to Amazon RDS for MySQL in private subnets. This solution allows the company to migrate its three-tier application to AWS by making minimal changes to the architecture, as it preserves the same web, application, anddatabase tiers and uses the same MySQL database engine. The solution also provides a database solution that can restore data to a specific point in time, as Amazon RDS for MySQL supports automated backups and point-in-time recovery. This solution also reduces the operational overhead by using managed servicessuch as Amazon EC2 and Amazon RDS, which handle tasks such as provisioning, patching, scaling, and monitoring.

The other solutions do not meet the requirements as well as the first one because they either involve more changes to the architecture, do not provide point-in-time recovery, or do not follow best practices for security and availability. Migrating the database tier to Amazon Aurora MySQL would require changing the database engine and potentially modifying the application code to ensure compatibility. Migrating the web tier and the application tier to public subnets would expose them to more security risks and reduce their availability in case of a subnet failure. Migrating the database tier to public subnets would also compromise its security and performance. References:

Migrate Your Application Database to Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS for MySQL

Amazon Aurora MySQL

Amazon VPC

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/PointInTimeRecovery.html

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/elb-redirect-http-to-https-using-alb/

How can I redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS using an Application Load Balancer? Last updated: 2020-10-30 I want to redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS using Application Load Balancer listener rules. How can I do this? Resolution Reference:https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/elb-redirect-http-to-https-using-alb/

https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/03/introducing-amazon-vpc-nat-gateway-in-the-aws-govcloud-us-region/#:~:text=NAT%20Gateway%20is%20a%20highly,instances%20in%20a%20private%20subnet.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-nat-comparison.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_MySQL.Replication.ReadReplicas.html

In Static Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are prebuilt.

They use simple languages such as HTML, CSS, or JavaScript.

There is no processing of content on the server (according to the user) in Static Websites. Web pages are returned by the server with no change therefore, static Websites are fast.

There is no interaction with databases.

Also, they are less costly as the host does not need to support server-side processing with different languages.

============

In Dynamic Websites, Web pages are returned by the server which are processed during runtime means they are not prebuilt web pages but they are built during runtime according to the user’s demand.

These use server-side scripting languages such as PHP, Node.js, ASP.NET and many more supported by the server.

So, they are slower than static websites but updates and interaction with databases are possible.

https://aws.amazon.com/pt/blogs/aws/amazon-cloudfront-support-for-custom-origins/

You can now create a CloudFront distribution using a custom origin. Each distribution will can point to an S3 or to a custom origin. This could be another storage service, or it could be something more interesting and more dynamic, such as an EC2 instance or even an Elastic Load Balancer

Requirement Analysis: The application was overwhelmed with unexpected data volume, leading to data loss and the need for a replay mechanism.

Amazon SQS Overview: SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that decouples and scales microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications.

Data Decoupling: By using an SQS queue, the application can store incoming tracker data reliably and process it asynchronously, preventing data loss.

Implementation:

Create an SQS queue.

Modify the web application to send incoming data to the SQS queue.

Configure the application instances to poll the SQS queue and process the messages.

Conclusion: This solution meets the requirements with minimal operational overhead, ensuring data is not lost and can be processed at the application’s own pace.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/how-to-replicate-secrets-aws-secrets-manager-multiple-regions/

Understanding the Requirement: EC2 instances need to upload data to S3 without using the public internet, and on-premises servers need to consume this data.

Analysis of Options:

Interface VPC Endpoint for EC2: Not relevant for accessing S3.

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: Provides private connectivity from EC2 instances to S3 and from on-premises to AWS, ensuring compliance with the requirement to avoid public internet.

Transit Gateway and Site-to-Site VPN: Adds unnecessary complexity and does not provide the same level of performance as Direct Connect.

Proxy EC2 Instances with NAT Gateways: Increases complexity and costs compared to a direct connection using VPC endpoints and Direct Connect.

Best Solution:

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: This solution ensures secure, private data transfer both within AWS and between on-premises and AWS, meeting the compliance requirements effectively.

This option is the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements because it allows the company to monitor and analyze the database login activity across all the accounts in the organization. By publishing the Aurora general logs to a log group in Amazon CloudWatch Logs, the company can enable the logging of the database connections, disconnections, and failed authentication attempts. By exporting the log data to a central Amazon S3 bucket, the company can store the log data in a durable and cost-effective way and use other AWS services or tools to perform further analysis or alerting on the log data. For example, the company can use Amazon Athena to query the log data in Amazon S3, or use Amazon SNS to send notifications based on the log data.

A. Attach service control policies (SCPs) to the root of the organization to identify the failed login attempts. This option is not effective because SCPs are not designed to identify the failed login attempts, but to restrict the actions that the users and roles can perform in the member accounts of the organization. SCPs are applied to the AWS API calls, not to the database login attempts. Moreover, SCPs do not provide any logging or analysis capabilities for the database activity.

B. Enable the Amazon RDS Protection feature in Amazon GuardDuty for the member accounts of the organization. This option is not optimal because the Amazon RDS Protection feature in Amazon GuardDuty is not available for Aurora PostgreSQL databases, but only for Amazon RDS for MySQL and Amazon RDS for MariaDB databases. Moreover, the Amazon RDS Protection feature does not monitor the database login attempts, but the network and API activity related to the RDS instances.

D. Publish all the Aurora PostgreSQL database events in AWS CloudTrail to a central Amazon S3 bucket. This option is not sufficient because AWS CloudTrail does not capture the database login attempts, but only the AWS API calls made by or on behalf of the Aurora PostgreSQLdatabase. For example, AWS CloudTrail can record the events such as creating, modifying, or deleting the database instances, clusters, or snapshots, but not the events such as connecting, disconnecting, or failing to authenticate to the database.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to restrict each application to its specific prefix in an S3 bucket and have granular control over the objects under each prefix.

Analysis of Options:

Dedicated S3 Access Points: Provides a scalable and flexible way to manage access to S3 buckets, allowing specific policies to be attached to each access point, thereby controlling access at the prefix level.

S3 Batch Operations: Suitable for large-scale changes but involves more operational overhead and does not dynamically control future access.

Replication to new S3 buckets: Involves unnecessary duplication of data and increased storage costs, and operational overhead for managing multiple buckets.

Combination of replication and access points: Adds unnecessary complexity and overhead compared to using access points directly.

Best Solution:

Dedicated S3 Access Points: This provides the least operational overhead while meeting the requirements for prefix-level access control and granular management.

Elastic BeanStalk is expensive, and DocumentDB has a 400KB max to upload files. So Lambda and S3 should be the one.

Understanding the Requirement: The data science team needs to securely share selective data with the engineering team across multiple AWS accounts with minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

Copy data to a common account: Involves data duplication and increased storage costs, and requires managing additional permissions.

Lake Formation permissions Grant command: This method can be effective but may involve significant operational overhead if managing permissions across multiple accounts and datasets manually.

AWS Data Exchange: Designed for sharing data externally or between organizations, which adds unnecessary complexity for internal sharing within the same organization.

Lake Formation tag-based access control: Provides a scalable and efficient way to manage access permissions based on tags, allowing fine-grained control and simplified management across accounts.

Best Solution:

Lake Formation tag-based access control: This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, allowing efficient management of cross-account permissions and secure data sharing.

Requirement Analysis: The goal is to migrate from Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with minimal application code changes.

Babelfish for Aurora PostgreSQL: Babelfish allows Aurora PostgreSQL to understand SQL Server queries natively, reducing the need for application code changes.

AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT): This tool helps in converting the database schema from SQL Server to PostgreSQL.

AWS Database Migration Service (DMS): DMS can be used to migrate data from SQL Server to Aurora PostgreSQL seamlessly.

Combined Approach: Enabling Babelfish addresses the SQL query compatibility, while SCT and DMS handle the schema and data migration.

References

Babelfish for Aurora PostgreSQL:Babelfish Documentation

AWS SCT and DMS:AWS Database Migration Service

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to ensure clients use a TLS certificate when accessing the website and automate the creation and renewal of TLS certificates.

Analysis of Options:

CloudFront Security Policy: Not applicable for creating certificates.

CloudFront Origin Access Control (OAC): Controls access to origins, not relevant for TLS certificate creation.

AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) with DNS Validation: Provides automated certificate management, including creation and renewal, with minimal manual intervention. DNS validation is automated and does not require manual intervention as email validation does.

AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) with Email Validation: Requires manual intervention to approve validation emails, which increases operational effort.

Best Solution:

AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) with DNS Validation: Ensures automated and efficient certificate management with the least operational effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The order processing system requires multiple independent validation steps, each handled by separate Lambda functions, with each function accessing only the subset of order information it needs. The system should be loosely coupled to accommodate future changes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon SQS with a new Lambda function for transformation: This involves additional complexity in creating and managing multiple SQS queues and an extra Lambda function for data transformation.

Amazon SNS with message filtering: While SNS supports message filtering, it is more suited for pub/sub messaging patterns rather than event-driven processing requiring fine-grained control over the data sent to each function.

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: EventBridge is designed for event-driven architectures, allowing for fine-grained control with input transformers that can modify and filter the event data sent to each target Lambda function, ensuring each function receives only the necessary information.

SQS with synchronous Lambda invocations: This approach adds unnecessary complexity with synchronous invocations and is not ideal for an event-driven, loosely coupled architecture.

Best Solution:

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: This option provides the most flexible, scalable, and loosely coupled architecture, enabling each Lambda function to receive only the required subset of data.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to transfer 50 TB of data to AWS with minimal operational overhead and no available network bandwidth for the transfer. The transformation job must continue running in the AWS Cloud.

Analysis of Options:

AWS DataSync and AWS Glue: DataSync is suitable for online data transfer, but there is no available network bandwidth. AWS Glue can be used for data transformation but does not solve the bandwidth issue.

AWS Snowcone: Snowcone is a smaller device suitable for smaller data transfers, and deploying the transformation application on it may not be feasible for 50 TB of data.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with Glue: This device is designed for large data transfers. Copying the data to the device is straightforward, and AWS Glue can handle data transformation in the cloud.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with EC2: This involves setting up EC2 instances for transformation, adding operational complexity compared to using AWS Glue.

Best Solution:

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with AWS Glue: This provides the least operational overhead for transferring large amounts of data and setting up the transformation job in the cloud.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to control the creation, rotation, and disabling of encryption keys for data stored in S3 with minimal effort.

Analysis of Options:

SSE-S3: Provides server-side encryption using S3 managed keys but does not offer full control over key management.

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): Allows the company to fully control key creation, rotation, and disabling, providing a high level of security and compliance.

AWS managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): While it provides some control, it does not offer the same level of granularity as customer-managed keys.

EC2 instance encryption and re-upload: This approach is operationally intensive and does not leverage AWS managed services for efficient key management.

Best Solution:

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): This solution meets the requirement for full control over encryption keys with minimal operational overhead, leveraging AWS managed services for secure key management.

Requirement Analysis: The application must process each credit card data validation request at least once, securely and cost-effectively.

SQS FIFO Queues: Ensures that each message is processed exactly once and in the exact order sent.

AWS Lambda: Using Lambda for event-driven processing ensures scalability and cost-efficiency.

SSE-SQS: Provides encryption at rest using SQS-managed keys, simplifying encryption management.

Implementation:

Set up SQS FIFO queues as the event source for Lambda.

Enable SSE-SQS for encryption.

Ensure the Lambda execution role has the necessary permissions to use the encryption keys.

Conclusion: This combination meets the requirements of security, exact-once processing, and cost-effectiveness.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

AWS Lambda with SQS:Using AWS Lambda with Amazon SQS

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Understanding the Requirement: The company has petabytes of data in S3 Standard across multiple buckets with varying access frequencies. They do not know the access patterns and need a cost-optimized storage solution with minimal operational effort.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Intelligent-Tiering: This storage class automatically moves data between two access tiers (frequent and infrequent) based on changing access patterns. It incurs a small monitoring and automation charge but eliminates the need to manually move data between storage classes.

S3 Storage Class Analysis Tool: While useful for determining access patterns, this tool requires manual intervention to move objects to the appropriate storage class, which increases operational overhead.

S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval: This storage class is designed for data that is rarely accessed but requires instant retrieval when needed. It may not be suitable for data with unknown and varying access patterns.

S3 One Zone-IA: This is a lower-cost option for infrequently accessed data stored in a single availability zone. It does not provide the same level of durability and availability as other options and requires knowledge of access patterns.

Best Option for Operational Efficiency:

S3 Intelligent-Tiering provides the best balance of cost savings and operational efficiency. It dynamically adjusts to access patterns without manual intervention, ensuring the company is only paying for what they need without the risk of incurring high costs for infrequent access data.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to collect transaction data in real time, avoid data duplication, and perform additional processing without managing infrastructure.

Analysis of Options:

SQS FIFO Queue with Lambda: Ensures data is processed in order and prevents duplication.Lambda handles processing without the need to manage servers.

SQS FIFO Queue with AWS Batch: While this ensures no duplicates, it introduces additional complexity and management overhead with AWS Batch.

Kinesis Data Streams with AWS Batch and EC2: Involves more components and infrastructure management, which is against the requirement of not wanting to manage infrastructure.

Step Functions with Lambda and EC2: Involves setting up multiple services and still requires managing EC2 instances, increasing complexity.

Best Solution:

SQS FIFO Queue with Lambda: This combination ensures real-time data processing, prevents duplication, and minimizes infrastructure management, meeting all requirements efficiently.

Understanding the Requirement: The application experiences slow performance at the start of peak hours, but normalizes after a few hours. The goal is to ensure proper performance at the beginning of peak hours.

Analysis of Options:

Application Load Balancer: Ensures proper traffic distribution but does not address the need to have sufficient instances running at the start of peak hours.

Dynamic Scaling Policy Based on Memory or CPU Utilization: While dynamic scaling reacts to usage metrics, it may not preemptively scale in anticipation of peak hours, leading to delays as new instances are launched and become available.

Scheduled Scaling Policy: This allows the Auto Scaling group to launch instances ahead of time, ensuring that enough instances are available and ready to handle the increased load right at the start of peak hours.

Best Solution:

Scheduled Scaling Policy: This approach ensures that new instances are launched and ready before peak hours begin, addressing the slow performance issue at the start of peak periods.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to automate inventory and updates of diverse OS versions on EC2 instances and summarize common vulnerabilities for monthly reviews.

Analysis of Options:

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Security Hub: Patch Manager automates patching, but Security Hub is more focused on compliance and security posture rather than inventory and vulnerability management.

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Amazon Inspector: Patch Manager automates OS updates, and Amazon Inspector provides vulnerability assessments, making this a comprehensive solution for the requirements.

AWS Shield Advanced and AWS Config: Shield Advanced is for DDoS protection, not suitable for OS patch management and vulnerability reporting.

Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Config: GuardDuty is for threat detection and monitoring, not specifically for patch management and vulnerability assessments.

Best Solution:

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Amazon Inspector: This combination automates OS updates and provides detailed vulnerability assessments, meeting both the inventory and security reporting needs effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The application is stateful and requires at least two EC2 instances to be running at all times, with a highly available and fault-tolerant architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: Ensures high availability by distributing instances across multiple AZs, fulfilling the requirement of always having two instances running.

Minimum capacity of four: Provides redundancy but is more than what is required and increases cost without additional benefit.

Spot Instances: Not suitable for a stateful application requiring guaranteed availability, as Spot Instances can be terminated at any time.

Combination of On-Demand and Spot Instances: Mixing instance types might provide cost savings but does not ensure the required availability for a stateful application.

Best Solution:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: This setup ensures high availability and meets the requirement with the least cost and complexity.

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company’s data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company’s data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company’s data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.

Requirement Analysis: The database experiences peak traffic multiple times a day but has wasted capacity during non-peak hours. The goal is to reduce costs with minimal operational effort.

Aurora Serverless Overview: Aurora Serverless automatically adjusts database capacity based on current demand, scaling up during peak times and scaling down during non-peak times.

Cost Efficiency: Aurora Serverless charges only for the capacity used, which is more cost-effective than provisioning for peak traffic.

Operational Efficiency: Aurora Serverless eliminates the need for manual scaling or scheduling Lambda functions for capacity management.

Implementation: Migrate the database from the provisioned Aurora PostgreSQL cluster to an Aurora Serverless cluster.

References

Amazon Aurora Serverless:Aurora Serverless Documentation

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to design a scalable and serverless solution for a near-real-time streaming application that experiences high latency due to large amounts of incoming data. The job processing takes about 30 minutes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: Provides a fully managed service for real-time data streaming and ingestion, allowing for seamless data delivery to destinations such as Amazon S3, Redshift, and Elasticsearch.

AWS Lambda with AWS Step Functions: While suitable for orchestration and lightweight processing, Lambda might not handle long-running jobs (max 15 minutes execution limit) efficiently.

AWS DMS: Primarily used for database migration, not for real-time data ingestion in this context.

Amazon EC2 in Auto Scaling Group: Provides scalability but involves managing servers, which is not serverless and adds operational overhead.

AWS Fargate with ECS: Offers a serverless compute engine for containers, allowing easy scaling and management without managing the underlying infrastructure.

Best Solution:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: For ingesting the streaming data efficiently.

AWS Fargate with ECS: For processing the data in a scalable and serverless manner.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to store a copy of all new photos in the us-east-1 Region from an S3 bucket in the us-west-1 Region.

Analysis of Options:

Cross-Region Replication: Automatically replicates objects across regions with minimal operational effort once configured.

CORS Configuration: Used for allowing resources on a web page to be requested from another domain, not for replication.

S3 Lifecycle Rule: Manages the transition of objects between storage classes within the same bucket, not for cross-region replication.

S3 Event Notifications with Lambda: Requires additional configuration and management compared to Cross-Region Replication.

Best Solution:

S3 Cross-Region Replication: This solution provides an automated and efficient way to replicate objects to another region, meeting the requirement with the least operational effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to map its IT infrastructure to identify and enforce security policies, with the ability to quickly query and identify security risks.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon RDS: While suitable for relational data, it is not optimized for handling complex relationships and querying those relationships, which is essential for an IT infrastructure map.

Amazon Neptune: A graph database service designed for handling highly connected data. It uses SPARQL to query graph data efficiently, making it ideal for mapping IT infrastructure and identifying relationships that pose security risks.

Amazon Redshift: A data warehouse solution optimized for complex queries on large datasets but not specifically for graph data.

Amazon DynamoDB: A NoSQL database that uses PartiQL for querying, but it is not optimized for complex relationships in graph data.

Best Option for Mapping and Querying IT Infrastructure:

Amazon Neptune provides the most suitable solution with the least operational overhead. It is purpose-built for graph data and enables efficient querying of complex relationships to identify security risks.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to migrate an application to AWS, increase its availability, and use AWS WAF in the architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This option provides high availability by distributing instances across multiple Availability Zones. The ALB ensures even traffic distribution, and AWS WAF provides security at the application layer.

Cluster placement group with ALB and WAF: Cluster placement groups are for low-latency networking within a single AZ, which does not provide the high availability across AZs.

Two EC2 instances with ALB and WAF: This setup provides some availability but does not scale automatically, missing the benefits of an Auto Scaling group.

Auto Scaling group with WAF directly: AWS WAF cannot be directly connected to an Auto Scaling group; it needs to be attached to an ALB, CloudFront distribution, or API Gateway.

Best Solution:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This configuration ensures high availability, scalability, and security, meeting all the requirements effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs all EC2 instances to share up-to-date website content with minimal lag time, running behind an Application Load Balancer.

Analysis of Options:

EC2 User Data with ALB: Complex and not scalable as it requires updating each instance manually.

Amazon EFS: Provides a scalable, shared file storage solution that can be mounted by multiple EC2 instances, ensuring all instances have access to the same up-to-date content.

Amazon S3 with EC2 Sync: Involves periodic synchronization which introduces lag and complexity.

Amazon EBS Snapshots: Not suitable for dynamic and frequent updates required by a content management system.

Best Solution:

Amazon EFS: Ensures all EC2 instances have access to a consistent and up-to-date set of website assets with minimal lag time, meeting the requirements effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to redesign the architecture to be highly available and use AWS managed solutions for hosting a web application with static content, PHP application, and Redis for user sessions.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk: Suitable for simplifying deployment but may not provide the desired flexibility and control for complex architectures.

AWS Lambda and API Gateway: Not ideal for hosting a stateful PHP application and handling static content.Adding complexity without significant benefit.

EC2 instance with ElastiCache and S3: Provides some high availability but involves managing EC2 instances, which increases operational overhead.

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This solution leverages fully managed AWS services for each component, ensuring high availability and scalability.

Best Solution:

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This combination of services meets the requirements for a highly available and managed solution, ensuring optimal performance and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to centrally collect security data with minimal development effort to assess and improve security across all workloads.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Security Lake: This is a purpose-built service for centralizing security data from across AWS services and third-party sources into a data lake. It provides native integration and requires minimal development effort to set up.

AWS Lake Formation with AWS Glue: While this can be used to create a data lake, it requires more development effort to set up and configure Glue crawlers for ingestion.

AWS Lambda with S3: This approach involves custom development to collect and process security data before storing it in S3, which requires more effort.

AWS DMS to RDS: AWS Database Migration Service is typically used for database migrations and is not suited for collecting and analyzing security data.

Best Option for Minimal Development Effort:

Amazon Security Lake provides the least development effort for setting up a centralized repository for security data. It simplifies data ingestion and management, making it the most efficient solution for this use case.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to optimize costs and reduce operational overhead for an RDS for PostgreSQL database that only needs to be active during business hours on weekdays.

Analysis of Options:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: Allows for automated start and stop schedules based on specified times, ideal for resources only needed during certain hours. This directly optimizes costs by running the database only when needed.

Turn off automatic backups and create weekly snapshots: Does not address the requirement of reducing operational overhead and optimizing runtime costs.

Custom Lambda function: This could work but adds unnecessary complexity compared to using the Instance Scheduler.

All Upfront Reserved DB Instances: While this reduces costs, it does not optimize for usage patterns that require the database only during specific hours.

Best Solution:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: This option effectively manages the database runtime based on the specified schedule, reducing costs and operational overhead.

Requirement Analysis: The goal is to prevent accidental deletion of EBS snapshots while avoiding indefinite retention.

Recycle Bin for EBS Snapshots: AWS Recycle Bin allows for retention rules that prevent immediate deletion of snapshots, providing a safety net against accidental deletions.

Retention Rule: A 7-day retention rule ensures snapshots are not permanently deleted immediately, giving time to recover from accidental deletions.

Implementation:

Enable Recycle Bin in your AWS account.

Create a retention rule that specifies a 7-day period for EBS snapshots.

Apply this rule to all EBS snapshots.

Conclusion: This solution provides an automated way to prevent data loss from accidental deletions with minimal development effort.

References

AWS Recycle Bin:AWS Recycle Bin Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to monitor and notify changes to the OU hierarchy with minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Control Tower with Account Drift Notifications: AWS Control Tower provides automated account provisioning and governance, including drift detection and notifications for changes in the OU hierarchy.

AWS Control Tower with AWS Config: AWS Config provides resource configuration tracking but is more complex compared to drift notifications directly available in Control Tower.

AWS Service Catalog with CloudTrail: While CloudTrail tracks changes, setting up notification mechanisms involves more operational overhead.

AWS CloudFormation with Drift Detection: Suitable for tracking configuration changes but less efficient for monitoring OU hierarchy changes compared to Control Tower's built-in features.

Best Solution:

AWS Control Tower with Account Drift Notifications: Provides a streamlined and efficient way to detect and notify changes in the OU hierarchy with minimal operational overhead.