Weekend Sale Special - 75% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: my75ex

Home > PRINCE2 > PRINCE2 Certification > PRINCE2-7-Practitioner

PRINCE2-7-Practitioner PRINCE2 Project Management Practitioner (Version 7) Question and Answers

Question # 4

PROCESSES

During the ‘starting up a project’ process, the Head of the Portfolio Office explains to the prospective project executive that LouisShopping is strategically important to the LOB portfolio, must support increased business opportunities and is expected to open by the end of financial year three.

During which activity should this clarification of the mandate and business expectations take place?

A.

Appoint the project management team

B.

Appoint the project executive and manager

C.

Select the project approach

D.

Plan the initiation stage

Full Access
Question # 5

During the ‘starting up a project’ process, the project team decides that the complex LouisShopping infrastructure project will use a traditional, linear-sequential delivery method.

Which role is accountable for selecting the project approach?

A.

Business layer

B.

Project executive

C.

Project manager

D.

Senior supplier

Full Access
Question # 6

The City Council asks the portfolio office, independently of the LouisShopping project team, to provide confidence that the design and build will preserve the historic setting while incorporating the required technology.

Is this an appropriate application of the quality practice, and why?

A.

Yes, because the portfolio office should manage the project’s quality-control activities on behalf of the project manager

B.

Yes, because the business layer may use the portfolio office to perform independent quality-assurance activity on its behalf

C.

No, because assurance information may be provided to the project board and not to the business layer

D.

No, because a portfolio office may assess strategy but may not review the delivery of individual projects

Full Access
Question # 7

During stage 2, the project board agrees that the underground car park should contain 15 rapid-charging spaces, with a scope tolerance permitting delivery of no fewer than 10 spaces. The project manager includes this tolerance in the relevant work package agreed with the team manager.

Is this an appropriate application of the ‘manage by exception’ principle, and why?

A.

Yes, because establishing a minimum and a preferred number of charging bays creates a defined scope tolerance that enables the design team to work within an agreed range without needing to escalate every individual design decision

B.

Yes, because specifying a minimum and a preferred number of charging bays constitutes a quality tolerance that the design team must meet within the agreed work package

C.

No, because the precise number of electric charging bays to be included should be fully specified in the product description for the underground car park rather than treated as a tolerance

D.

No, because the project board should approve the precise number of charging spaces rather than delegate a permissible range to the design team

Full Access
Question # 8

During initiation, the project executive asks the project manager to evaluate a credible business option that omits the underground car park. The project manager includes an investment appraisal of that option in the full business case, despite the main contractor’s objection.

Is this an appropriate application of the business case practice, and why?

A.

Yes, because developing the business case includes comparing credible business options to select the most appropriate investment

B.

Yes, because customer and supplier organizations must always maintain completely separate project business cases regardless of the given investment

C.

No, because a requirement in the initial scope may never be tested as part of an alternative option

D.

No, because anticipated parking income means that no alternative should be assessed

Full Access
Question # 9

In stage 4, the Heritage Director delegates a review of the inspection arrangements to the Heritage Manager. The Heritage Manager will work with the BuildyBrick CEO and the project manager, then report whether the planned inspections will provide adequate assurance about impacts on historic buildings.

Is this an appropriate application of the ‘define roles, responsibilities and relationships’ principle, and why?

A.

Yes, because the principle requires that communication channels between all internal and external project team members remain open and transparent at all times

B.

Yes, because the Heritage Manager needs a clear understanding of what the Heritage Director requires of them and of what they may reasonably expect from the other parties involved

C.

No, because it is the project manager’s responsibility to specify how inspections of historically significant buildings should be planned and executed

D.

No, because the Heritage Director, as senior user, should personally conduct the assurance review of the inspection plans rather than delegating to the Heritage Manager

Full Access
Question # 10

During stage 3, several BuildyBrick subcontractors are working on different work packages. The project manager is concerned that lessons identified by one team will not reach the others and could lead to rework, delay or additional cost. The project manager therefore holds a fortnightly cross-team ‘lunch and learn’ session.

Is this an appropriate application of the ‘learn from experience’ principle, and why?

A.

Yes, because the regular knowledge-sharing sessions provide a structured mechanism for team managers to identify and apply lessons arising during the current stage

B.

Yes, because the subcontractors are expected to contribute lessons from previous construction projects that are directly relevant to the current stage

C.

No, because subcontractors should concentrate on meeting their work package commitments and tolerances rather than attending sessions that take them away from delivery

D.

No, because the Regeneration Manager should gather lessons through individual interviews with team managers and document them formally in a lessons report at the end of the stage

Full Access
Question # 11

The Louistown City Council operates a well-established and standardized project management framework that includes a defined procedure for developing business cases. For the LouisShopping Project, a ‘strategic business case’ was included in the project brief submitted to the project board at the conclusion of the ‘starting up a project’ process. The project has now entered the ‘initiating a project’ process, during which the full business case is being built upon the strategic business case, which was itself derived from the Council’s five-year strategic plan for the ‘Louistown is Open for Business’ portfolio.

Does this represent an appropriate application of the ‘business case’ practice, and why?

A.

Yes, because developing the business case from multiple perspectives – strategic, economic, and commercial – ensures a comprehensive and robust justification for the project investment

B.

Yes, because the project should align its approach to business case development with the City Council’s established procedure, which serves as the equivalent of PRINCE2’s recommended business case lifecycle

C.

No, because the full business case should be developed from an outline business case prepared during the ‘starting up a project’ process, and using a ‘strategic business case’ instead is not compliant with the method

D.

No, because responsibility for developing the full business case for each project in the portfolio lies with the portfolio office, not the project team

Full Access
Question # 12

Near the end of stage 2, the supplier planned for the utilities and systems work becomes financially unstable and a replacement subcontractor is selected for stage 3. The project manager recommends that the replacement subcontractor’s account manager should represent the supplier interest as senior supplier.

During which ‘managing a stage boundary’ activity should this recommendation be developed?

A.

Update the project plan

B.

Prepare the next stage plan

C.

Evaluate the stage

D.

Request the next stage

Full Access
Question # 13

ISSUES

During stage 1, BuildyBrick was appointed by the procurement team manager as the main contractor for the project. The project is now in stage 3 and BuildyBrick is part way through the site preparation. Following an environmental survey report, BuildyBrick will have to delay the site clearance by several weeks to enable protected amphibians to be relocated. There are two options to deal with this issue. The first is to wait for BuildyBrick to clear the site, but this will take longer. The second is to hire an additional contractor to clear the site more quickly, but this will cost more. Both of these options can be completed within cost and time tolerances, but appointing an additional contractor is beyond the project manager’s delegated authority.

Here are three actions related to the resolution of this issue.

Which role (A–E) should be responsible for each action?

Choose only ONE role for each action. Each role can be used once, more than once, or not at all.

A.

Project executive

B.

Senior user

C.

Senior supplier

D.

Project assurance

E.

Project manager

Action 1:

Review the issue report and decide which response should be authorized.

Action 2:

After the decision is made, update the issue record with the selected response and decision.

Action 3:

Once the appointment is authorized, confirm that the supplier resources required for the additional site-clearance work can be provided.

Full Access