L4M6 Supplier Relationships Question and Answers

Selection criteria focus on the supplier’s capability and experience (e.g., method statements). Award criteria are used to evaluate and compare proposals during the tender process, such as price or environmental considerations.

Profitability is impacted when product costs rise without corresponding price adjustments. Understanding cost-price relationships is key to managing profitability in procurement.

Explanation

The portable CD player has been replaced with a substitute product. This threat wasn't considered by the company and this resulted in poor sales. There are many questions in the exam on Porter's 5 Forces - see p. 39

Explanation

Using technical jargon can lead to misunderstandings if not all parties understand the jargon. See p. 158 on communication issues

Confidentiality is critical in professional relationships, especially for law firms, as they handle sensitive client information. Ensuring that all legal obligations to protect this information are met aligns with ethical and legal best practices.

The Restricted and Two-stage procedures involve a PQQ stage to shortlist suppliers before issuing an ITT. This approach is common for contracts requiring stringent supplier qualifications.

Explanation

The reason for outsourcing in this example is that the IT firm is an expert in their field. The requirement is complex and important and this is the reason why it is not being delivered in-house. The other answers given CAN be reasons for out-sourcing, but don't relate to this example. For a full list of reasons a company could use outsourcing see p. 4-5

Bread is a strategic item due to its high spend and critical role in daily operations. A partnership approach ensures consistent quality and reliability, aligning with strategic supplier management principles.

Poor communication leads to misunderstandings, unmet expectations, and conflict, undermining partnerships. CIPS stresses the importance of transparent and regular communication to ensure alignment and success.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Partnership sourcing is most appropriate for products that are critical to the buyer's business, involve high spend, and are technically complex or require innovation. The chocolate brownie cake is the company's most popular product, indicating high sales volume and strategic importance. Establishing a partnership with suppliers for this product can lead to benefits such as improved quality, innovation, and supply chain efficiency.

When procuring critical components essential for the continuity of manufacturing processes, timely delivery becomes paramount. Delays can halt production lines, leading to significant financial losses.Therefore, the supplier's ability to meet delivery deadlines is the key selection criterion, as emphasized in the CIPS L4M6 study guide.

Forward buying involves purchasing in advance to lock in current prices and avoid future increases. This strategy is effective in volatile markets where price hikes are anticipated.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘An unexpected incident has occurred beyond anyone’s control’. A good example of this would be the Covid-19 pandemic- neither the buyer nor supplier could have predicted this, and if this means that the contract can’t be completed – then the contract can be terminated (in the UK at least). A way to avoid this would be to include a Force Majeur clause listing possible circumstances that could occur. When there’s a Force Majeur clause, these eventualities are now classed as foreseen rather than unforeseen. See p.108

Explanation

Legislative changes wouldn't affect rivalry in a market as all suppliers would be equally as affected, the same with supply chain disruptions. Factors which do affect rivalry include; industry growth and decline, product differences, brand identity, switching costs, diversity of competitors and exit barriers. These are listed on p.41

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Traditional contracting agreements are typically characterized by:

Short-Term Focus:These agreements often prioritize immediate needs over long-term collaboration.

Transactional Nature:Emphasis is on price and terms rather than building strategic partnerships.

In the Norming stage of Tuckman’s model of team development, teams begin to resolve their differences, appreciate each other's strengths, and respect authority. Agreement on design and role assignment indicates the team has moved past conflict (Storming) and is now functioning collaboratively, although not yet fully productive (Performing).

Explanation

It can be difficult for buyers in the private sector to build relationships with suppliers because of rules that state competitive tenders must be undertaken every few years (within the EU this is usually every 4). This means that both parties aren’t as invested in developing the relationship as it’s possible the contact will end shortly. Competitive tendering is a requirement in the public sector to ensure value for money for taxpayers. See p.79 for further details. There are no rules stating Public Sector organisations can’t have good relationships with suppliers, and in fact most will have good relationships with their current suppliers- the issue is that neither party can get too invested in the relationship as everyone knows it may end shortly. There are rules, however, against entering into Partnership relationships (which is discussed in chapter 3).

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes- mediation involves a neutral third party and gets both parties to attempt to reach a compromise’. Be careful not to confuse mediation with arbitration – arbitration is when the buyer and supplier agree to accept a third party’s decision which will solve the disagreement issues. See p.112 for more information on solving disputes

Suppliers gain power when their products have limited substitutes, are highly differentiated, or when switching costs are high. These factors reduce buyer leverage and increase supplier influence, as described in Porter’s Five Forces model.

Explanation

This QUESTION NO: refers to Porter's Value Chain (p.35). There's a couple of questions on this in the exam so try to learn it. Primary activities are; inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, after sales- service

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In Michael Porter's Value Chain model, primary activities are those that are directly involved in the creation and delivery of a product or service. These include:

Inbound Logistics:Activities related to receiving, storing, and distributing inputs internally.

Operations:Transforming inputs into the final product.

Outbound Logistics:Distributing the final product to customers.

Marketing and Sales:Activities that inform buyers about products and services, induce buyers to purchase them, and facilitate their purchase.

Service:Activities that maintain and enhance the product's value, such as customer support and repair services.

Firm infrastructure and technology development are considered support activities, as they assist the primary activities in helping the organization achieve its competitive advantage.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The buying organisation's decision to terminate the partnership with supplier FGH is influenced by:

Changes in the composition of the supply market: The entry of new suppliers into the market provides the buying organisation with more options, reducing dependency on FGH and enabling the pursuit of better partnerships.

Poor communication by the supplier: FGH's lack of proactive communication regarding delivery delays has led to frustration, indicating a breakdown in the partnership's effectiveness.

These factors align with the principles of supplier relationship management, where effective communication and adaptability to market changes are crucial.

Explanation

This question refers to Porter's Value Chain (p.35). There's a couple of questions on this in the exam so try to learn it. Procurement is a 'support activity' on this matrix along with firm infrastructure, HR and technology development

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes- joint innovation projects are often a strong motivation for entering into a partnership’. The other options are simply not true statements. A lot of the questions on the ‘Partnerships’ chapters of the book are common-sense questions like this. It involves reading the QUESTION NO: and using logic, rather that relying on your knowledge of procurement. If you found this QUESTION NO: easy – that’s a good sign for the exam.

Explanation

George should use a weighted award criteria – this will allow him to judge suppliers not only on cost, but also on the quality of their products and whether or not they can provide maintenance. For example George could weight the bids in this way; 40% cost, 30% durability of the panels and 30% maintenance costs. For more information on how weighted award criteria works see p.78

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) refers to the practice of involving suppliers early in the product development process to leverage their expertise and capabilities. Cross-organisational involvement entails collaboration across various departments within the organization, such as procurement, engineering, manufacturing, and R&D, to ensure the product design is feasible and efficient for production.

High expenditure levels and the complexity of requirements justify partnership sourcing, as it allows for collaborative problem-solving, innovation, and cost-efficiency. CIPS emphasizes that partnerships are ideal when requirements are complex and require expertise from the supplier.

Partnering supports supply chain consolidation and continual improvement by fostering collaboration and shared objectives. These benefits align with the strategic goals of building resilient and efficient supply chains.

Explanation

This is a bottleneck supplier- refer to the Kraljic matrix on p.20; these types of supplier hold a monopoly in the marketplace and provide low-value items. There are lots of questions on Kraljic in the exam - do revise this topic and ensure you understand each of the four quadrants of the matrix

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In the Kraljic Matrix, a 'Bottleneck' item is characterized by low financial impact but high supply risk. These items may be sourced from a limited number of suppliers or involve complex logistics, making them susceptible to supply disruptions. Managing bottleneck items requires strategies focused on risk mitigation, such as developing alternative suppliers or holding strategic stock reserves.

Cost modeling helps in understanding supplier pricing strategies, identifying cost drivers, and opportunities for negotiation or cost reduction, which supports profitability improvements.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘no-the contract is not of significant value’. CIPS state that competitive tenders should only be used when ‘the item or service is of significant value’ p.73. Debbie could continue using the same supplier, but she should organise a contract extension or a new contract if she does.

Explanation

The correct answer is Measurable, achievable and relevant. This is from SMART KPIs on p. 151. Smart stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound. In the exam they come up in different orders so be careful.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Obtaining multiple quotations for contracts over a certain value ensures that the organization assesses various options, promoting competition and transparency. This practice helps in achieving value for money by comparing different suppliers' offerings.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘accommodating’. This QUESTION NO: is based on the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict model on p.87. This comes up quite a bit in the exam. It is comprised of 5 techniques for dealing with conflict; competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding and accommodating. In this instance, the supplier should have a high degree of co-cooperativeness and a low degree of assertiveness as the long-term relationship is very important- more important than the outcome of the disputed invoice.

Explanation

Carter's 10 Cs are a way to qualify (aka shortlist) a supplier. See p.11 for more details on this and p.10 for the stages of the relationship cycle.

Explanation

This is one of those questions you have to read carefully- it asks for 'elements of a business'. Cost focus and cost leadership are ways a company can improve their competitive advantage, but they're not elements of a business. The other three options are. Porter created a list of elements of a business that can help a company's competitive advantage- these can be found on p.33-34

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘keep satisfied’ because the stakeholder is high power and low interest. This is the top left corner of Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix – see p.81

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

For one-off, low-value purchases that are readily available from multiple suppliers, anadversarialrelationship is often appropriate. This type of relationship is transactional, with minimal collaboration or long-term commitment. The focus is on obtaining the best price and terms for a specific purchase without investing in developing a deeper relationship.

Buyers with a strong brand profile and adherence to ethical standards attract suppliers, as they provide market prestige and assurance of fair practices. This aligns with CIPS's emphasis on ethical procurement.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘The CEO is a key player- so it is important he is involved early in the process’. The CEO has high power and high interest which puts him in the top right-hand corner of Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix (p.81). CIPS says Key Players should be involved early in the procurement process (p.82).

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘It can lead to a lack of trust’ – this is a quote from p.162. The other answers are all incorrect; in a partnership KPIs are joint between the parties– so there wouldn’t be a situation where one party doesn’t fulfil their KPIs. Commitment doesn’t necessarily have a direct correlation with profit so that answer is incorrect. ‘Sufficient time and resources are put in’ is a positive thing, so can’t be a reason who a partnership fails.

Explanation

The correct answer is TUPE: Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment). Details on TUPE can be found on p.115

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘The Matrix doesn’t consider whether the stakeholder is for or against the activity’. For a list of other limitations of using Mendelow’s Stakeholder Matrix see p.82

Drivers for partnership include a high spend with the supplier, criticality of the product, and technical complexity. These factors encourage collaboration for cost efficiency, quality improvement, and risk management. Partnerships are less likely when there are many suppliers or the product is a commodity, as competition and standardization reduce the need for close collaboration.

Explanation

This is an example of poor-communication. The information was not passed from the person who signed the contract to the staff on site who were to do the cleaning. See p.158 on communication issues.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

By acquiring an Australian office furniture manufacturer, COFM can:

Access the Restricted Local Market:Acquisition allows COFM to operate as a local entity, thereby overcoming barriers to entry and benefiting from any local government support available to domestic manufacturers.

Improve Knowledge of the Local Market:The acquired company brings with it an understanding of local customer preferences, regulatory requirements, and market dynamics, which is invaluable for successful operations.

However, the acquisition does not remove government support for other local manufacturers, nor does it necessarily decrease competition.

Explanation

In a 'perfect competition' there are no barriers to entry or exit, and competition is at its highest possible level. For more information on different types of market see p.40

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘greater creativity’. A synergy is the concept that the value and performance of two companies combined will be greater than the sum of the separate individual parts. P.160

Explanation

Tail spend items are low value, high volume. P. 132

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Fast-changing technology necessitates close collaboration between buyers and suppliers to stay ahead of market trends and innovations. Partnerships enable shared development efforts, quicker adaptation, and mutual growth in dynamic technological environments.

Complex and technical suppliers often involve high financial risks due to the critical nature of their products. A close relationship ensures better collaboration, risk management, and value generation.

Explanation

Note the word ‘NOT’ in the question. In order for a competitive tender to be successful, there should be a clear specification in place (i.e. you need to know what you want, in order for suppliers to bid for it). Competitive tendering should also only be used for high value purchases; it’s time consuming to do, so you wouldn’t do it for low value items such as pens for the office. Therefore the correct answer to this question is 'items are of low value' and 'there isn’t a clear specification'. There’s a useful table on p.73 of when you would and wouldn’t use a competitive tender.

Routine suppliers typically supply low-value, low-risk items. Maintaining partnerships in such cases is inefficient since alternative suppliers are readily available. Adopting a transactional or adversarial relationship would be more appropriate.

Obtaining multiple quotations ensures value for money by comparing suppliers based on cost, quality, and other criteria. It promotes competitive pricing and informed decision-making.

Explanation

Friendly Flour Ltd is a strategic supplier; this is a critical supplier, responsible for core products. They represent a high risk impact and a high cost impact. This is the top-right hand corner of the Kraljic matrix. There are lots of questions on Kraljic in the exam - do revise this topic and ensure you understand each of the four quadrants of the matrix (see p.20)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Partnership sourcing is a strategic approach that emphasizes long-term collaboration between buyers and suppliers to achieve mutual benefits. While achieving a competitive acquisition cost is a component, it is not the sole objective. Partnership sourcing also focuses on:

Quality Improvement:Ensuring that products or services meet or exceed quality standards.

Innovation:Collaborating on new product development and process improvements.

Risk Management:Sharing information to anticipate and mitigate risks.

Supply Chain Efficiency:Streamlining processes to reduce lead times and inventory levels.

Therefore, while cost is important, partnership sourcing encompasses a broader range of objectives aimed at creating value for both parties.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Effective conflict resolution involves:

Individual Meetings:Understanding the root cause of the conflict by discussing with each individual separately to determine if issues are personal or work-related.

Joint Meetings with Mutual Targets:Bringing the individuals together to set mutual goals can foster collaboration and reduce friction.

Avoiding the issue (Option D) or moving a team member (Option C) are not proactive solutions and may not address the underlying problem.

Explanation

The correct answer is ‘Yes- the Public Sector is regulated by EU procurement regulations which prohibits this’. This is stated on p.122. Please note that this study guide and exam were written before Brexit. Once Brexit happens, nobody knows what will happen with this.

Explanation

The correct answers are; They are likely to be able to gain price stability and There may be greater continuity of supply. The other options are an advantage for the supplier rather than the buyer (They will gain an increased volume of business) and a disadvantage of entering into a partnership (The supplier may become complacent). As you may have guessed from these questions – Partnerships come up a LOT in the exam. See p.130 for info on pros and cons of partnerships.

Partnership sourcing is suitable for products that contribute to the buying organization's unique selling point (USP) and for critical products on which key customers depend. This approach ensures strategic alignment and mutual benefits for both parties, focusing on collaboration rather than cost alone.

Explanation

The correct answer is “A mechanism for performance management where the buyer has the right to deduct money from payments owed for under performance”. A definition is provided on p.113 and states “If a supplier fails to meet the standard set in the service credits, the buyer has the right to deduct set amounts of money from payments owed to the supplier”