ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Question and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9000:2015 defines quality as "the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics of an object fulfills requirements."

Clause 3.6.2 (Quality) confirms this definition.

Quality is determined by how well an object (product, service, or process) meets defined requirements (customer, regulatory, or internal).

The other options do not align with the official ISO definition:

Option A refers to performance capability but does not define quality.

Option C describes work conditions, not quality.

Option D focuses on efficiency rather than fulfilling requirements.

•

Reviews the client’s management system documented information: This activity involves checking the documentation of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team also evaluates the client’s understanding and implementation of the standard, and identifies any gaps or nonconformities that need to be addressed before the Stage 2 audit123.

•Reviews the processes with high level of risk: This activity involves assessing the processes that have a significant impact on the quality of the products or services, or that pose a high risk of nonconformity or customer dissatisfaction123. The audit team also verifies the client’s risk management approach, and evaluates the effectiveness of the controls and actions taken to mitigate the risks123.

The other options are not statements that are true for the Stage 1 audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is D and G.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.4.9 (Corrective Actions):

Minor nonconformities do not require a follow-up audit but must be corrected before the next surveillance audit.

Follow-up audits are required only for major nonconformities.

The audit team should recommend corrective actions, not enforce immediate follow-ups for minor nonconformities.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Understanding the Purpose of a Quality Management System (QMS):The primary objective of ISO 9001:2015 is to improve the overall performance of the organization by:

Ensuring consistent delivery of products and services that meet customer and regulatory requirements.

Focusing on enhancing customer satisfaction.

Promoting continual improvement of the organization’s processes and practices.

ISO 9001:2015 requires audits to be planned and conducted to ensure the quality management system conforms to requirements and is effectively implemented. While ISO 9001 sets the requirement, it explicitly refers auditors to ISO 19011 for detailed guidance on audit planning and execution.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2.2 (NOTE) states that guidance for auditing management systems is provided in ISO 19011 .

Based on ISO 19011:2018 (Clause 6.3 – Initiating and preparing for the audit), the audit team leader is responsible for finalising key planning issues before documenting the audit plan, especially for multi-site and multi-country audits.

Explanation of the selected options:

A. Arrangement of translation of the audit report

ISO 19011 requires consideration of communication and language arrangements during audit preparation. Where sites are located in different countries, potential language difficulties must be addressed during planning, including translation needs for reports and communications.

C. Structuring the audit plan to account for audit trails

ISO 19011 requires audits to follow audit trails across processes, functions, and interfaces. The audit plan must be structured to allow logical progression through interrelated processes, which must be decided before the plan is documented.

D. Determining available IT infrastructure for remote participation

ISO 19011 allows the use of remote auditing techniques. When audit team members are located in different countries, the audit team leader must confirm the availability of IT infrastructure to support remote participation in opening and closing meetings as part of audit planning.

E. Considering processes not operating at the time of the audit

ISO 19011 requires the audit team leader to consider process availability. If some processes are not operating during the audit period, alternative audit methods (such as records review or rescheduling) must be planned in advance and reflected in the audit plan.

Explanation of why the other options are not selected:

B: ISO 19011 requires identification of roles and functions to be audited, not specific names, at the audit planning stage.

F: Moderation or grading of nonconformities is performed after audit findings are raised, not during audit planning.

G: Post-audit communication arrangements are addressed during reporting and follow-up activities, not before documenting the audit plan.

H: Follow-up audits are planned only if required after audit results are known, not during initial audit planning.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9000:2015, which provides definitions for terms used in ISO 9001:2015, a management system is defined as a set of interrelated or interacting elements of an organization to establish policies, objectives, and processes to achieve those objectives.

A Quality Management System (QMS) is a type of management system that ensures organizations meet customer and regulatory requirements while improving performance.

Clause 3.5.3 of ISO 9000:2015 clearly defines "management system" and aligns with this question. The other options do not fit the definition:

Standard refers to an established norm or requirement.

Organization scope defines the boundaries of a QMS but is not a system itself.

Quality manual is a document (optional under ISO 9001:2015) that describes a QMS but is not the system itself.

According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.7 requires that an organization identify and control any nonconforming outputs that do not conform to the requirements of the customer or other relevant requirements. Nonconforming outputs are any outputs from the process, product or service that do not meet the specified quality criteria. Nonconforming outputs must be dealt with in one or more of the following ways:

Correction of the nonconformity

Segregation, containment, return or suspension of provision of products and services

Informing the customer

Authorisation for acceptance under concession

The organization must also retain documented information on the description of the nonconformity, the actions taken, any concessions obtained, and the identification of the authority deciding the action to resolve the nonconformity.

In this scenario, you have interviewed a line supervisor who is responsible for managing a manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products. The supervisor has explained that these plastic items are rejected at this stage because they do not meet their processing standards and they can damage their machinery and compromise their quality standards. The supervisor has also mentioned that some of these rejected items are melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled.

Based on this information, you can investigate further by taking two actions:

A. Check the process for handling nonconforming items: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for identifying, segregating, containing, returning or suspending provision of nonconforming items at this stage. You can also check whether there is a system for informing customers about any nonconforming items that may affect their satisfaction or expectations.

D. Determine what happens to the waste products: You can verify whether there is a documented procedure for disposing of waste products that cannot be recycled as per environmental regulations and customer requirements.

These two actions would help you to determine whether there are any nonconforming outputs at this stage and how they are controlled by the organization.

In the context of a third-party audit, the activities and the parties responsible can be matched as follows:

Review the organization’s processes: This is typically the responsibility of the audit team. They examine the processes to ensure they comply with the specified standards1.

Review the audit results: The audit team leader usually reviews the audit findings to ensure accuracy and completeness before they are finalized1.

Issue the certificate: The certification body is responsible for issuing the certificate if the audit is successful and the organization meets the required standards1.

Select the audit team: The individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team. This ensures that the team has the appropriate skills and knowledge for the audit1.

These roles are essential to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the audit process. The audit team conducts the actual audit, the team leader oversees the audit process, the certification body grants the certification, and the management of the audit program ensures that the right team is in place to conduct the audit1.

Based on the description of the image you’ve provided, here’s how the activities match with the responsible parties in the context of a third-party audit:

Review the organization’s processes: This activity is typically the responsibility of the Audit Team. They are tasked with examining the processes to ensure they meet the requirements of the standard being audited.

Review the audit results: The Audit Team Leader is usually responsible for this activity. They oversee the audit process and are in charge of reviewing the findings and ensuring that the audit objectives are met.

Issue the certificate: The Certification Body is responsible for issuing the certificate if the organization’s management system is found to be in compliance with the standard.

Select the audit team: The Individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team. They ensure that the team has the appropriate competence and resources to effectively conduct the audit.

These roles are defined within the framework of ISO 9001:2015 and are essential for the proper conduct of a third-party audit. The audit team and its leader play a critical role in the operational aspects of the audit, while the certification body and those managing the audit programme have overarching responsibilities for the audit’s governance and integrity.

ISO 9001:2015 clearly distinguishes between management review inputs and management review outputs.

Relevant ISO 9001 requirement

Clause 9.3.2 – Management review inputsManagement review shall consider information on, among other things:

customer satisfaction and feedback from relevant interested parties;

the extent to which quality objectives have been met;

the effectiveness of actions taken to address risks and opportunities.

Explanation of the correct answers:

B. Updates to the risk register

This represents information on risks and opportunities and the effectiveness of actions taken to address them, which is an explicit management review input under Clause 9.3.2.

C. Positive and negative customer comments

Customer feedback is a direct input to management review, supporting evaluation of customer satisfaction, as required by Clause 9.3.2 and Clause 9.1.2.

D. Report of performance of quality objectives in the last year

This provides evidence of the extent to which quality objectives have been met, which is a mandatory management review input under Clause 9.3.2.

Explanation of why the other options are not inputs:

A. Revisions required to the quality system documentationThese are typically outputs of management review (decisions on changes to the QMS), not inputs.

E. Procurement of a laser measuring toolThis is a specific operational or resource decision, not a required management review input.

F. Actions for quality system improvementActions for improvement are management review outputs, covered under Clause 9.3.3, not inputs.

ISO-aligned conclusion:

Management review inputs are performance data and information used by top management to make decisions. In this scenario, the correct input audit evidence is:

updates to risks and opportunities,

customer feedback, and

performance against quality objectives.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Correct Option B – “Communicate a policy commitment to continual improvement”

This aligns directly with Clause 5.2.1(d) of ISO 9001:2015, which states that the quality policy shall include a commitment to continual improvement of the QMS:

“Top management shall establish, implement and maintain a quality policy that... includes a commitment to continual improvement of the quality management system.”

A clearly communicated policy sets expectations and a strategic direction that cascades throughout the organization, promoting a culture that values ongoing enhancement.

Correct Option F – “Use the management review process to identify improvements”

This is based on Clause 9.3.3 of ISO 9001:2015, which specifies that outputs of management reviews must include decisions and actions related to:

“a) opportunities for improvement;

b) any need for changes to the quality management system;

c) resource needs.”

The management review process is a structured mechanism to analyze data, monitor performance, assess risks and opportunities, and drive continual improvement initiatives.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A (Appoint external consultants to train staff): While training may help improve competence, ISO 9001 emphasizes internal process evaluation and strategic improvement. This option is not directly aligned with the systematic improvement of the QMS.

C (Require higher standards): Higher standards alone don’t ensure continual improvement unless supported by a structured QMS approach involving evaluation, planning, and measurement.

D (Require fewer mistakes): Unrealistic or unqualified demands like "make fewer mistakes" don’t support structured process-based improvement and may conflict with ISO’s emphasis on risk-based thinking and root cause analysis.

E (Send Chief Executive on a course): While leadership involvement is vital (Clause 5), this action by itself does not constitute a continual improvement mechanism for the QMS.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Auditors must have competence in risk-based auditing to effectively assess an organization’s QMS performance and compliance.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 7.2.3 – Determining Auditor Competence:

Auditors must have knowledge of risk-based thinking to assess risk impact on processes.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 0.3.3 – Risk-Based Thinking:

The standard emphasizes proactive risk management, which auditors must understand.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

Risk-based auditing ensures audits focus on high-risk areas, improving audit effectiveness.

Auditors must assess how organizations apply risk-based thinking in decision-making, process control, and improvement.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Industry knowledge) → While helpful, it is not mandatory for all auditors.

C (Expertise in all domains) → Auditors are not required to be experts in all areas, just in audit methodology.

D (Formal degree in quality management) → ISO does not require a formal degree, just competence in audit principles and methods.

The appropriate response in this situation would be:

C. I will raise it as a minor nonconformity; you have the option to appeal to our Certification Body.

This response acknowledges the restaurant manager’s point that the shortage of some hamburgers may not constitute a management system failure. However, the fact remains that the menu was not updated to reflect the current availability of products, which led to customer dissatisfaction. This is a deviation from the ISO 9001 standard, which requires that the organization ensures the availability of resources needed to provide products and services as promised1. Raising it as a minor nonconformity allows the organization to address the issue within a specified timeframe and provides an opportunity for appeal if the organization disagrees with the auditor’s decision2.

Audit Evidence and Applicable ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.3 Extracts

Half of all new products launched in the past 12 months were late. The Product Development Manager explains he has not got enough people on his team to cope with the demand for new products.→ ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.2 e) – “…internal resource needs for the design and development of products and services…”

The Product Development Manager explains many changes are made to cosmetic formulations during product development owing to retailer feedback. Only when confirmed by the retailer is the agreed formulation documented on SWIFT.→ ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.5 – “…retain documented information on design and development changes…”

The Product Development Manager explains that the customer confirms their approval to proceed with a new formulation by email. These emails are kept on SWIFT.→ ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.6 – “…retain documented information on design and development outputs…”

The Product Development Manager shows you evidence of consumer trials that are carried out for some new products before a full-scale launch.→ ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.4 d) – “…conducted to ensure that the resulting products and services meet the requirements…”

The Product Development Manager explains that an approved external laboratory is used to perform shelf-life stability trials on some formulations during product development.→ ISO 9001 Clause 8.3.2 e) – “…external resource needs for the design and development of products and services…”

ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.3 (Design and development of products and services) requires organisations to plan, control, review, verify, validate, and document design and development activities to ensure products meet requirements.

Explanation of clause alignment:

Clause 8.3.2 e) requires the organisation to determine both internal and external resource needs. Lack of personnel causing late launches directly evidences internal resource shortfalls, while the use of an external laboratory demonstrates control of external resources.

Clause 8.3.5 requires organisations to control design and development changes and retain documented information describing those changes, which is demonstrated by controlled updates in SWIFT following retailer confirmation.

Clause 8.3.6 requires retention of documented information on design and development outputs, including customer approvals, which are evidenced by stored emails in SWIFT.

Clause 8.3.4 d) requires design and development activities such as verification and validation, ensuring outputs meet requirements. Consumer trials prior to launch clearly meet this requirement.

ISO-aligned conclusion:

The evidence provided demonstrates structured control of product design and development, including planning, resourcing, change management, validation, and retention of documented information, all mapped directly to ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.3 requirements.

Documented information is a means by which an organization demonstrates compliance. It communicates what we do and how we do things, it communicates what happened and what results were achieved. It is, essentially, a tool for communication. ISO 9001:2015 allows an organization flexibility in the way it chooses to document its quality management system (QMS). This enables each individual organization to determine the correct amount of documented information needed in order to demonstrate the effective planning, operation and control of its processes and the implementation and continual improvement of the effectiveness of its QMS. The standard states that the organization shall maintain documented information to the extent necessary to support the operation of processes and retain documented information to the extent necessary to have confidence that the processes are being carried out as planned. Therefore, the purpose of retaining documented information is to support the operation of the processes of the QMS, not to facilitate auditing, provide confidence or safeguard integrity, which are secondary benefits of documented information. References: Guidance on the requirements for Documented Information of ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001:2015 documented information | CQI | IRCA, Documented Information Required by ISO 9001:2015 - 9000 Store

Clause 8.2.4 of ISO 9001:2015 – Changes to Requirements for Products and Services:ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.2.4 states that when changes to requirements for products or services are made, they must be communicated and agreed upon with relevant interested parties (in this case, the Health Trust). The lack of communication and agreement for substituting the cleaning chemical represents a clear violation of this clause.

Analysis of the Corrective Action Proposed:The organization proposed "obtaining a concession from the Health Trust for the use of the new chemical." This action is reactive and assumes approval from the Health Trust without addressing the systemic issue: the lack of a defined change control process for managing contract changes.

Option Analysis:

A. The substitute chemical has not been used before in the Health Trust:Incorrect. While this may be a concern, it is not directly relevant to the root cause of the nonconformity, which is the absence of a process to handle contract changes.

B. The action assumes that the Health Trust will agree to the change:Incorrect. Although this is true, it is not the primary issue. The nonconformity lies in the lack of a structured approach to obtain agreement, not whether the Health Trust agrees.

C. Staff have not been trained in the use of the new chemical:Incorrect. This is a separate issue related to staff competence (Clause 7.2), but it is not the main reason why the corrective action is unacceptable under Clause 8.2.4.

D. The process for making changes to the contract has not been addressed:Correct. The fundamental issue is the organization's failure to follow or establish a change control process for amending contracts, including gaining formal agreement from the Health Trust. The proposed corrective action does not ensure that such issues will be systematically prevented in the future.

E. The substitute chemical may not be as effective as the original:Incorrect. The effectiveness of the substitute chemical is secondary to the primary issue, which is the lack of a change management process.

ISO 9001 References Supporting the Correct Answer:

Clause 8.2.4: Requires that changes to product/service requirements be reviewed, communicated, and agreed upon with the customer.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires the organization to address the root cause of the nonconformity and take actions to ensure it does not recur. In this case, the root cause is the absence of a change control process.

Why D is the Best Answer:The core issue is that the organization did not have a formalized process for managing and agreeing upon changes to contract requirements. Addressing this process gap is essential to prevent recurrence of similar nonconformities. Merely seeking a concession from the Health Trust is a one-off solution that does not address the systemic issue.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes continual improvement as a fundamental requirement of an effective Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause Reference:

Clause 4.4.1 (Quality Management System and Its Processes) states that organizations must:

Determine processes needed for the QMS

Establish criteria and methods for process effectiveness

Ensure continual improvement of the system

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Continual improvement is a core principle of ISO 9001.

Organizations must regularly assess and enhance their QMS to adapt to new challenges and maintain effectiveness.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (To change the QMS quarterly) → ISO 9001 does not mandate a specific frequency for system changes.

B (To review the QMS annually) → QMS reviews must be conducted as needed, not strictly annually.

D (To conduct a QMS gap analysis every two years) → Gap analysis is useful but is not a mandatory requirement under Clause 4.4.

A Stage 1 audit is a preliminary assessment to evaluate the readiness of the organisation for the Stage 2 certification audit. The audit scope is defined by the audit client and the certification body based on the application and the contract. If the organisation wants to include a new work area that was not part of the original scope, the auditor should advise the Quality Manager that an extension of the scope is possible but will have to go through established procedures, such as submitting a formal request, providing relevant information, and paying additional fees. The auditor should also suggest that the Quality Manager will advise the programme manager, who is responsible for managing the audit programme, that the audit scope should be revised to include the new work area. The programme manager will then decide whether to approve or reject the request, and communicate the decision to the auditor and the Quality Manager. The auditor should not proceed with the audit of the new work area without the approval of the programme manager and the confirmation of the audit scope. 1234 References:

1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

2: ISO 9001 Certification Audits | Stage 1 and Stage 2 - 9001. Simplified

3: What is the difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audits? - ISO Update

4: Getting Certified to ISO 9001 - the Stage 1 Audit

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Audit risks are categorized into different types based on where failures may occur in the QMS audit process.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.3 – Managing Audit Risk: Defines different audit risks, including control risk.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Control risk occurs when internal controls fail to prevent or detect nonconformities.

Even if controls exist, the risk remains if the QMS fails to identify or correct defects.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Inherent risk) → This refers to risks naturally present in processes, even before controls are applied.

C (Detection risk) → This is the risk that an auditor fails to detect nonconformities.

D (Operational risk) → This refers to risks related to day-to-day business operations, not QMS audits.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

A guide is assigned by the auditee to assist the audit team by:

Managing logistics, such as ensuring that relevant documents are available and arranging interviews.

Assisting in the coordination of meetings and access to facilities.

Helping the auditors navigate the organization during the audit.

However, the guide does not fill gaps in the auditor’s knowledge or witness the audit for the certification body. Their primary function is logistical support, not providing interpretations or assessments.

According to the ISO 19011:2018 document, the audit plan should provide the basis for agreement regarding the conduct and scheduling of the audit activities. The amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives1. The scope of the audit refers to the extent and boundaries of the audit, such as the audit criteria, the audit objectives, the organizational and functional units, and the processes to be audited1. The complexity of the audit refers to the degree of difficulty or intricacy of the audit, such as the number and diversity of the auditees, the audit criteria, the audit methods, and the audit team composition2. The risk of not achieving the audit objectives refers to the possibility that the audit may fail to provide reliable and sufficient audit evidence to support the audit conclusions and report1.

Therefore, the complete sentence is:

In the context of a third-party audit, the amount of detail provided in the audit plan should reflect the scope and complexity of the audit, as well as the risk of not achieving the audit objectives.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 19011:2018 requires auditors to conduct audits professionally and diligently.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 4.4 – Professional Care: Auditors must exercise due diligence in conducting audits.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 – Internal Audit: Requires objective and systematic audits to evaluate QMS effectiveness.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

The audit team followed best practices by gathering verifiable audit evidence through interviews, document reviews, and observations.

They ensured fair presentation of findings in the final audit report.

They complied with ISO 9001 and ISO 19011 guidelines for audit procedures.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Ordinary negligence) → No evidence of negligence; the team followed structured audit processes.

C (Gross negligence) → No indication that the auditors ignored important responsibilities.

D (Willful misconduct) → The auditors acted professionally and did not intentionally disregard rules.

To certify an organization's ISO 9001:2015-based Quality Management System (QMS) for the first time, the correct sequence of activities would be:

Establish the management system (already in place).

Supplier audit

Internal audit

Management review

Initial certification audit – stage 1

Initial certification audit – stage 2 (already in place).

This sequence follows the typical path for preparing and ensuring that a QMS is functioning as required, leading up to certification.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to measure and monitor customer perceptions to determine whether customer requirements are being met.

Clause Reference:

Clause 9.1.2 – Customer Satisfaction states that organizations must monitor customer perceptions using relevant methods such as customer surveys, feedback forms, and complaint analysis.

One of the most effective ways to do this is gap analysis, which identifies differences between customer expectations and actual service or product performance.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Gap analysis helps determine discrepancies between current performance and customer expectations, allowing organizations to improve quality.

It is a standard quality improvement tool used to assess customer satisfaction.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (PEST analysis) → Focuses on external macroeconomic factors (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) rather than customer satisfaction.

B (Market-share analysis) → Examines business performance relative to competitors, not customer perceptions.

D (Competitive benchmarking) → Involves comparing processes with competitors but does not directly monitor customer perceptions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Policies and guidelines are considered documentary evidence because they are written records that demonstrate how an organization complies with ISO 9001 requirements.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 – Audit Evidence:

Documentary evidence includes manuals, procedures, and policies.

Why is the Correct Answer C?

Documentary evidence includes written records such as policies, procedures, and documented instructions that support QMS implementation.

Auditors review policies to verify conformance with ISO 9001.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Confirmative evidence) → Not a recognized category in ISO auditing.

B (Technical evidence) → Technical evidence refers to measurements, test results, or product data, not policies.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

An autocratic management style is characterized by:

Top management making all decisions without delegation.

Strict control over employees.

A lack of employee input in decision-making.

Centralized management (Answer C) refers to decision-making being concentrated at the top, but it does not necessarily imply strict control. Laissez-faire management (Answer B) allows employees high independence, which contradicts the scenario.

ISO 9001:2015 requires audits to be objective, evidence-based, and independent. While the standard does not prescribe detailed audit techniques, it clearly supports the use of objective evidence that can be obtained without human interaction, particularly through observation and review of documented information.

✅ C. Observing work performed

Observation is a recognized audit technique where the auditor watches activities being carried out without questioning personnel.

ISO 9001 emphasizes verifying that processes are implemented as planned and achieve intended results.

Observation provides direct, objective evidence of process implementation.

📌 Supported by:

Clause 9.2.1 – Internal audits must determine whether the QMS is effectively implemented and maintained

Clause 4.4.1 – Processes must be implemented and controlled as planned

Observation can therefore be done on-site, silently, and without interaction.

✅ F. Conducting a document review

Reviewing documented information (procedures, records, logs, policies) does not require interaction with auditees.

ISO 9001 explicitly requires the use and control of documented information and allows auditors to verify conformity by reviewing it independently.

📌 Supported by:

Clause 7.5.1 – The QMS shall include documented information required by ISO 9001

Clause 9.2.2 – Audit evidence shall demonstrate conformity to requirements

Document review can be conducted on-site, at a desk, without speaking to anyone.

❌ Why the other options are NOT correct

A. Completing a questionnaire for the auditeeRequires interaction and responses from people.

B. Audit understanding of Business ContextRequires discussions with top management and review of strategic inputs (Clause 4.1).

D. Audit customer communications about order handling enquiriesNormally requires discussion, clarification, or explanation of communication processes.

E. Conducting interviewsBy definition requires human interaction.

The key expected results of a quality management system that conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001:2015 are stated in clause 0.1 of the standard, which says: “The adoption of a quality management system is a strategic decision for an organization that can help to improve its overall performance and provide a sound basis for sustainable development initiatives. The potential benefits to an organization of implementing a quality management system based on this International Standard are: a) the ability to consistently provide products and services that meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements; b) facilitating opportunities to enhance customer satisfaction; c) addressing risks and opportunities associated with its context and objectives; d) the ability to demonstrate conformity to specified quality management system requirements.” Therefore, the two options that best match these benefits are A and E, as they directly relate to providing products and services that meet customer requirements and enhancing customer satisfaction. The other options are not explicitly mentioned as key expected results, although they may be possible outcomes of implementing a quality management system. References: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems — Requirements, Key Elements of an ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System, What is ISO 9001 2015 as a Quality Management Systems?

Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

The process by which the accuracy of test equipment is checked against a known standard. = Calibration

The process by which a product or service is visually examined to determine conformity to requirements. = Evaluation

The process by which data is examined in detail to reach a specific answer or answers. = Analysis

The process by which a parameter of a product or service is examined to determine a specific value. = Measurement

According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary, the definitions of the process names are as follows:

Calibration: operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the quantity values with measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this information to establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication.

Evaluation: determination of the suitability, adequacy or effectiveness of an object to achieve established objectives.

Analysis: detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

Measurement: process to experimentally obtain one or more quantity values that can reasonably be attributed to a quantity.

Therefore, the process descriptions can be matched to the process names based on these definitions.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 Clause 5.1.1 (Leadership and Commitment) states that top management must demonstrate leadership and commitment to the QMS by actively participating in QMS implementation, integration, and effectiveness.

In scenario 2, top management refused to be directly involved in the QMS implementation team, which violates Clause 5.1.1 because leadership involvement is essential for the system’s success.

Other options do not indicate nonconformance:

Option A (Middle managers in the QMS team) is acceptable.

Option C (Leslie assigning roles) is valid if competence is ensured (Clause 5.3 – Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities).

Option D (Team reviewing the policy before approval) aligns with best practices.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit):

Internal audits can be conducted on an ongoing basis as part of continual improvement.

Audits consider both conformity and effectiveness (A is incorrect).

Thus, C is the correct answer.

ISO 9001:2015 requires organisations to understand their context and to use this understanding as an input to planning the quality management system. Tools such as PESTLE are acceptable methods, but auditors must verify how the outputs are used, not simply that the analysis exists.

Relevant ISO 9001 requirements:

Clause 4.1 – Understanding the organisation and its contextThe organisation shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of the QMS.

Clause 6.1 – Actions to address risks and opportunitiesThe organisation shall plan actions to address risks and opportunities identified from context analysis and integrate these actions into the QMS processes.

Explanation of the correct audit trails:

C. What actions have been taken to address the risks and opportunities from the PESTLE analysis?

This audit trail directly links PESTLE outputs to Clause 6.1. It allows the auditor to determine whether the organisation has translated identified political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental issues into concrete actions within planning, operational control, or resource allocation. Without actions, the PESTLE analysis has no impact on QMS planning.

E. How has the PESTLE analysis contributed to the improvement of the QMS?

ISO 9001 requires context analysis to support improvement and strategic alignment of the QMS. This audit trail confirms whether PESTLE outputs are used as inputs to improvement activities, management review, or changes to processes, supporting Clauses 4.1, 6.1, and 10.3.

Explanation of why the other options are not selected:

A: Review by a specific manager is not a requirement of ISO 9001 and does not demonstrate impact on QMS planning.

B: PESTLE does not require consultation with external interested parties; that relates to Clause 4.2, not planning impact.

D: Training in SWOT is irrelevant, as ISO 9001 does not mandate any specific analysis tool.

F: Sharing information with external interested parties relates to communication, not to how PESTLE affects QMS planning.

ISO-aligned conclusion:

To determine how PESTLE analysis affects planning of a QMS, the auditor must follow audit trails that demonstrate:

Conversion of identified issues into risk-based actions, and

Use of those outputs to improve and adapt the QMS.

Therefore, the correct answers are C and E.

Identifying the source of information

Sampling available data

Gathering audit evidence

Verifying objective evidence

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria

Making audit conclusions

Evaluating against the audit criteria

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4, the process of collecting and verifying information during an audit involves the following steps1:

Identifying the source of information: The audit team should identify the sources of information that are relevant to the audit objectives, scope and criteria. These sources may include documents, records, personnel, processes, activities, facilities, equipment, etc. The audit team should also determine the methods and tools for accessing and collecting the information, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc.

Sampling available data: The audit team should select a representative sample of the available data to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the management system. The sample size and selection method should be based on the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the level of confidence and risk. The audit team should also consider the validity, reliability, relevance and sufficiency of the data.

Gathering audit evidence: The audit team should use the methods and tools identified in the previous step to collect audit evidence, which is the records, statements of fact or other information that are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. The audit team should record the audit evidence in a clear, concise and objective manner, using notes, checklists, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.

Verifying objective evidence: The audit team should verify the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the audit evidence collected. This may involve cross-checking different sources of information, confirming the identity and authority of the persons providing the information, examining the original documents or records, etc. The audit team should also identify any discrepancies, inconsistencies or gaps in the audit evidence.

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria: The audit team should compare the audit evidence with the audit criteria to determine the extent of conformity and nonconformity. The audit team should also identify any opportunities for improvement, best practices, positive aspects or potential risks. The audit team should use professional judgement and apply the principles of auditing when evaluating the audit evidence.

Making audit conclusions: The audit team should consolidate the audit findings and evaluate the overall performance and effectiveness of the management system. The audit team should also consider the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the context and expectations of the auditee and other interested parties. The audit team should provide a clear, concise and objective statement of the audit conclusions, which may include the degree of conformity, the achievement of the intended outcomes, the need for corrective actions, the suitability for certification, etc.

Evaluating against the audit criteria: The audit team should review the audit conclusions and ensure that they are consistent with the audit criteria and supported by sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. The audit team should also ensure that the audit conclusions are communicated to the auditee and other relevant parties in a timely and effective manner, using the agreed audit report format and distribution method.

Here is the correct matching of the activities with the responsible parties in the context of a second-party audit:

Define the audit scope: Customer

Develop the audit plan: Audit team leader

Respond to the audit findings: External provider

Conduct the audit: Audit team

This reflects the typical division of responsibilities in a second-party audit, where the customer (the party commissioning the audit) sets the scope, the audit team leader manages the planning, the external provider responds to findings, and the audit team carries out the audit.

Sequence:

Stage 1 Audit

Stage 2 Opening Meeting

Interviews

Stage 2 Closing Meeting

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings

Issue Certificate

Surveillance Audit

Follow-up Audit

To complete the sequence, you can drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

Here is a brief explanation of each step:

Stage 1 Audit: This is the initial audit that aims to assess the readiness of the organization for the stage 2 audit. It involves reviewing the documentation of the quality management system, evaluating the scope and objectives of the audit, and identifying any major gaps or nonconformities34.

Stage 2 Opening Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the start of the stage 2 audit. It involves confirming the audit plan, the audit criteria, the audit scope, and the audit team. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to ask any questions or raise any concerns34.

Interviews: This is the main activity of the stage 2 audit, where the audit team collects evidence by interviewing the personnel involved in the quality management system, observing the processes and activities, and examining the records and documents. The audit team uses various techniques, such as sampling, measurement, analysis, and evaluation, to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system345.

Stage 2 Closing Meeting: This is the meeting that marks the end of the stage 2 audit. It involves presenting the audit findings, the audit conclusions, and the audit report to the auditee. It also provides an opportunity for the auditee to provide feedback, ask questions, or dispute any findings34.

Close-out of Stage 2 Audit Findings: This is the process of verifying that the auditee has taken appropriate corrective actions to address any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement identified during the stage 2 audit. The audit team may request evidence or conduct a follow-up visit to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions34.

Issue Certificate: This is the process of issuing a certificate of conformity to the auditee, if the audit team is satisfied that the quality management system meets the requirements of the standard and that there are no major nonconformities or unresolved issues. The certificate is valid for a specified period, usually three years, and is subject to periodic surveillance audits34.

Surveillance Audit: This is the process of conducting periodic audits, usually once a year, to monitor the continued conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system. It involves reviewing the changes, improvements, and performance of the quality management system, and identifying any new nonconformities or opportunities for improvement34.

Follow-up Audit: This is the process of conducting an additional audit, usually in response to a significant change, a complaint, or a major nonconformity, to verify the impact and the corrective actions taken by the auditee. It may result in the suspension, withdrawal, or renewal of the certificate, depending on the outcome of the audit34.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 (Conducting Interviews), group interviews should be conducted with at least two auditors to ensure objectivity and accuracy.

This prevents bias or misinterpretation of responses.

It allows for cross-validation of information.

It ensures that the audit results remain objective and impartial.

Since Li Na conducted the group interviews alone, she did not follow audit best practices. The correct approach would have been to have another auditor present during the interviews.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit):

Internal audits are conducted by employees of the company who are trained as auditors.

External auditors are not mandatory unless required by the organization.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Understanding Audit Stages Based on ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015

ISO certification audits consist of two main stages:

Stage 1 Audit (Readiness Review)

The organization’s documented information is reviewed to assess readiness for Stage 2.

This ensures that the QMS is developed, implemented, and prepared for full assessment.

Stage 2 Audit (On-Site Evaluation)

Auditors assess process implementation and effectiveness through interviews, observations, and evidence collection.

The audit team verifies if the organization meets ISO 9001 requirements in practice.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

The audit team reviewed ME’s documents, which is a Stage 1 activity.

The audit team performed interviews, sampling, and on-site verification, which is a Stage 2 activity.

There was no mention of an audit follow-up or a surveillance audit, which occur post-certification.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Audit follow-up and Stage 1 Audit) → Follow-up audits occur after certification, which was not the case here.

C (Stage 2 Audit and Surveillance Audit) → Surveillance audits are post-certification audits and were not conducted yet.

Top management is responsible for establishing, implementing, and maintaining the quality policy. The quality policy provides a framework for setting quality objectives and must be compatible with the context of the organization and support its strategic direction. It should also provide a commitment to satisfy applicable requirements and to continuous improvement.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015 (Conformity Assessment – Requirements for Certification Bodies), Clause 9.3.1.2, the Stage 1 Audit typically consumes around 30% of the total audit time.

This time is allocated to:

Reviewing documented information.

Assessing the readiness for Stage 2.

Identifying potential nonconformities.

A 20% allocation (Answer A) is too low, and 40% (Answer C) is excessive, as the majority of the audit should be spent on Stage 2 (on-site verification).

•To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit: This objective involves assessing the readiness of the organisation to undergo the Stage 2 audit, where the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system will be verified123. The audit team will check the level of implementation and understanding of the quality management system, identify any major gaps or nonconformities, and confirm the audit scope, criteria, and plan123.

•To review the quality manual: This objective involves reviewing the documented information of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team will also evaluate the organisation’s understanding and application of the standard, and identify any areas of improvement or concern123.

The other options are not included in the objectives of the Stage 1 initial certification audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.

As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here’s how the situation should be handled:

E. Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.

F. Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.

H. Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.

Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally​​.

 Clause Reference – ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.6 (Release of Products and Services):

ISO 9001 requires that products and services are not released to the customer until:

All planned verification activities have been completed.

Acceptance criteria have been met.

Any necessary approvals have been obtained.

In this scenario:

The sacrificial anodes for Project DK were shipped before the galvanic efficiency test results were analyzed.

This constitutes a nonconformity against Clause 8.6 because the products were released without completing the required tests.

ï‚· Option Analysis:

A. A retrospective concession was not sought from the customer once the test results had been approved by the Quality Manager:Incorrect. While obtaining a concession might mitigate the situation, the nonconformity pertains to the process failure of releasing the products without completing required tests, not the absence of a concession.

B. Release of the product without acceptable test results has been accepted by the customer for Project DK:Incorrect. The customer was not informed before the release, and there is no indication that this was accepted beforehand. Furthermore, ISO 9001 requires planned processes to be followed, regardless of later acceptance.

C. Products for Project DK have been released before product approval through the quality control process:Correct. This description accurately reflects the nonconformity. The quality control process required test results to be analyzed and verified before release, which did not happen.

D. The untested product was not recalled until the galvanic efficiency of the anodes was verified:Incorrect. The issue is not about recalling the product but about releasing it without completing the required tests. Recalling the product is not mentioned in the scenario.

ï‚· Why C is Correct:

The nonconformity is a clear breach of Clause 8.6, where the products were released without meeting the planned verification requirements.

This demonstrates a failure in adhering to quality control processes, which is a critical aspect of ISO 9001 compliance.

ï‚· Key ISO 9001 Reference:

Clause 8.6: Products and services shall not be released to the customer until all planned activities (e.g., testing) have been satisfactorily completed, or the customer has approved the release with knowledge of deviations.

To demonstrate top management’s leadership and commitment with respect to the quality management system, the following four actions would be indicative:

B. Briefing staff on the development of an improvement culture: This shows that top management is actively involved in promoting a culture of continuous improvement, which is a key aspect of the quality management system1.

C. Chairing management review meetings: By leading these meetings, top management demonstrates their involvement in the quality management system’s ongoing performance and commitment to its continual improvement1.

E. Investing time and money in corrective actions arising from nonconformities: This indicates that top management is committed to addressing issues and ensuring that the quality management system is effective and continually improving1.

G. Promoting the importance of following procedures: When top management emphasizes the importance of adherence to procedures, it reinforces the significance of the quality management system and its processes1.

These actions align with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes the need for top management to take accountability for the effectiveness of the quality management system and to promote a focus on continual improvement and customer satisfaction123. Approving company car budgets, conducting disciplinary meetings, and not attending the audit closing meeting do not directly demonstrate leadership and commitment to the quality management system1.

The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:

•Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body’s procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.

•Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee’s nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.

The following options are not correct:

•Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM’s response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee’s delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.

•Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.

•Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.

•Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee’s performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee’s QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.

ï‚· Clause: 8.5.4

ï‚· Nature of Problem: Cleaning and sanitising records are not available for every batch.

ï‚· Unfulfilled Requirement: "The organization shall implement production provision under controlled conditions."

A → 8.4.3.a

B → 7.2.b

C → 10.2.2

D → 10.2.1

E → 6.2

F → 5.2.2.c

8.4.3.a – No specification is issued to the suppliers of waste plastic:This clause refers to the information provided to external providers, including requirements for products and services. If no specification is issued, it means the organization is not complying with this clause, which states:

“The organization shall ensure that the requirements for the products and services to be provided are adequately defined prior to communication to the external provider.”

7.2.b – The picking operators have been trained:This falls under Competence requirements. Clause 7.2(b) requires that persons are competent on the basis of education, training, or experience:

“Ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience.”

10.2.2 – No documentation is retained for rejected materials:This relates to corrective action documentation. Clause 10.2.2 requires organizations to retain documented information as evidence of nonconformities and actions taken:

“The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of: the nature of the nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken…”

10.2.1 – The rejected materials are segregated:This links to the treatment of nonconforming outputs. Clause 10.2.1 discusses actions such as containment or segregation for nonconforming outputs:

“Deal with nonconforming outputs in one or more of the following ways: correction; segregation, containment…”

6.2 – Management has set an objective for the level of recycling:This refers to quality objectives. Clause 6.2 requires that measurable quality objectives be established, and this includes setting performance targets:

“The organization shall establish quality objectives at relevant functions… The quality objectives shall be measurable…”

5.2.2.c – The quality policy appears in promotional material:Clause 5.2.2(c) requires the quality policy to be available to relevant interested parties. Using it in promotional material ensures that it is communicated externally:

“The quality policy shall be… available to relevant interested parties, as appropriate.”

According to clause 10.2.1.b of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent their recurrence. This means that the organization should identify and address the root causes and contributing factors of the nonconformities, and implement appropriate corrective actions that are effective and proportional to the impact of the nonconformities. In this case, the evidence statement that supports the finding of nonconformance is C, because it shows that the organization did not take effective actions to prevent the recurrence of the spelling errors in the print run, which resulted in repeated customer rejections and dissatisfaction. The other options are not directly related to clause 10.2.1.b, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option A may relate to clause 7.2 on competence, option B may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option D may relate to clause 7.1 on resources. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity and Corrective Action], ISO 9001 Clause 10. Improvement - ISO-templates.com

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Stage 2 audit (ISO 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.3.1.3) is conducted to:

Verify whether the QMS is effectively implemented and operational.

Ensure compliance with ISO 9001 requirements in actual practice.

Identify nonconformities that may impact certification.

Reviewing documented information (Answer B) is part of Stage 1, and gathering scope information (Answer C) is done before the certification audit.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.1 (Impartiality):

Internal auditors must not audit areas where they have direct responsibilities to avoid conflicts of interest.

Outsourcing (C) is not required, as long as impartiality is maintained internally.

Thus, B is the correct answer.

According to the ISO 19011:2018 standard, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems, the team leader of an audit team should be an auditor who has demonstrated the competence to manage an audit of the relevant management system scheme. This means that the team leader should have the appropriate knowledge, skills, and experience to plan, conduct, report, and follow-up an audit of the specific management system, such as ISO 9001 for quality management systems. The other options are false because: B. An audit team can include non-qualified auditors, but only as observers or trainees who do not contribute to the audit findings or conclusions. C. A technical expert can assist a qualified auditor on an audit team, but cannot replace them, as a technical expert does not have the competence to perform audits. D. Audits leading to auditor qualification are not undertaken annually, but rather as part of a certification process that involves meeting certain criteria, such as education, work experience, audit experience, and examination. References: ISO 19011:2018, PECB Certified ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide, ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Lead Auditor Training Course

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Clause 8.5.3 – Property Belonging to Customers or External Providers:This clause requires the organization to care for customer property while it is under their control. If there is damage, they must inform the customer and retain documented information. Thus, informing customers of the reason for laundry damage relates directly to this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.3

Clause 7.1.3 b – Infrastructure:It refers to the provision and maintenance of infrastructure necessary for the operation of processes. This includes equipment. If resources are not allocated for outdated equipment, it directly breaches this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.3 b

Clause 10.2.1 b – Corrective Action:This clause covers actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities to prevent recurrence, including evaluating and correcting customer complaints.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.1 b

Clause 5.1.2 b – Customer Focus (Top Management):Top management must ensure risks to customer satisfaction, including property damage, are addressed. This aligns with addressing the risk of damaging customer laundry.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 5.1.2 b

Clause 6.2 – Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them:Setting objectives for reducing customer complaints (like those about laundry damage) falls under this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.2

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.9 (Audit Conclusions & Reporting):

One consolidated audit report should be drafted based on all team members’ findings.

Each auditor does not draft separate reports (B) unless explicitly required.

Thus, A is the correct answer.

Nonconformity report

ISO 9001 Clause Number: 9.3.1 Nature of problem: Management review has not been conducted at the defined frequency. ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled: ISO 9001 - “Top management shall review the organization’s quality management system at planned intervals.” Evidence: The last management review took place nine months ago, and the previous one took place one year before the latest review. The planned interval is six months.

 First-party Management System audit → All members of an audited organisation

 Second-party Management System audit → Interested parties of an organisation

According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems) and as reinforced in ISO 9001 Lead Auditor training materials, audit types are defined as:

First-party audit – conducted by the organization itself, or on its behalf (internal audit).✅ The audit client is all members of the audited organisation, because the audit is internal, involving all functional areas under the organization’s control.

Second-party audit – conducted by a customer or other person on behalf of a customer (external but not by a certification body).✅ The audit client includes interested parties of an organisation, such as customers who want to verify if their suppliers meet contractual or regulatory requirements.

These definitions are directly aligned with ISO 19011:2018, Clause 3.13 – Types of audits.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Certification body / Accreditation body → These relate to third-party audits, not first or second.

Top management / Functions of an audited organisation → Refer to auditees or audit participants, not the audit client itself.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle is a continuous improvement model used in ISO 9001:2015. The "Check" phase involves monitoring, measuring, and analyzing the results to assess if the planned actions have been effective.

In scenario 1, AL-TAX tested the effectiveness of the intended actions, which aligns with the Check stage of the PDCA cycle. Clause 9.1.1 (Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation) requires organizations to evaluate their QMS and determine whether improvements are necessary.

Reduced incoming inspection → A. Quality

Improved communication with suppliers → B. Procurement

Purchased materials received on time → C. Logistics

Reduced variability within processes → D. Production

According to ISO 9001:2015, Clause 8.4 - Control of externally provided processes, products and services, organisations are required to ensure that externally provided products and services conform to specified requirements. When an organisation sources from ISO 9001 certified suppliers, there is greater assurance of consistency in quality, delivery, and communication. This enhances internal operations across various functions:

Reduced incoming inspection (Quality): ISO 9001 certified suppliers have robust quality controls (Clause 8.4.2), reducing the need for repeated inspections upon receipt. This aligns with Quality’s responsibility for incoming inspection and verification.

Improved communication with suppliers (Procurement): Clause 8.4.3 emphasizes the communication of detailed requirements to external providers. Procurement plays a key role in ensuring these requirements are understood and met.

Purchased materials received on time (Logistics): Timely deliveries are often a result of structured supplier evaluation and selection (Clause 8.4.1). Logistics benefits through fewer delays and better scheduling of internal processes.

Reduced variability within processes (Production): Consistency of supplied materials supports stable and predictable production processes, which is a key aspect of Clause 8.5 – Production and service provision.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 7.2, an auditor shall have the competence to:

Understand the requirements of ISO 9001 and how they relate to the audit

Understand the organization’s quality management system and its processes

Understand the applicable legal, regulatory, contractual and other requirements that affect the audit

Understand the needs and expectations of interested parties other than customers

Plan and conduct audits in accordance with ISO 19011

Evaluate audit evidence and draw appropriate conclusions

Communicate audit findings effectively1

Therefore, knowledge of ISO 9001 requirements and ISO 19011 audit principles are essential for every member of an audit team auditing an ISO 9001 quality management system.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

One of the common misconceptions about ISO 9001 is that it only applies to manufacturing companies producing tangible goods. However, ISO 9001:2015 is designed for all types of organizations, including service providers such as financial, healthcare, and IT companies.

Clause 1 (Scope) clearly states that ISO 9001 is applicable to any organization, regardless of type, size, or the products and services it provides. AL-TAX, being a financial services company, is equally eligible for implementing a QMS under ISO 9001.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.2.2.e, the organization is required to retain documented information as evidence of the implementation of the audit programme and the audit results. This includes the records of the nonconformities identified during the internal audits and the corrective actions taken to address them. The organization is also required to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions, as per clause 10.2.2.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the Quality Manager’s decision to automatically close any nonconformance over 3 years old without obtaining any confirmation from the relevant departments or verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions is a clear violation of the requirements of clause 9.2.2.e. This indicates a lack of control and follow-up of the internal audit process, as well as a potential risk of recurrence or occurrence of the nonconformities in other areas. This also undermines the credibility and value of the internal audit programme, as well as the risk-based approach claimed by the Quality Manager.

Hence, the best course of action to take is D, to raise a nonconformance report against clause 9.2.2.e of ISO 9001, and to communicate the audit findings to the relevant management. The other options are either insufficient or irrelevant to address the issue, as they do not directly relate to the noncompliance with clause 9.2.2.e.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes risk-based thinking, which helps organizations identify factors that could prevent achieving planned results and take preventive action. Clause 6.1 (Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities) requires organizations to determine risks and opportunities and implement actions to mitigate potential negative impacts.

In the scenario, AL-TAX identified potential risks and implemented preventive actions, aligning with risk-based thinking. ISO 9001:2015 integrates risk management throughout the standard, ensuring processes are designed to minimize uncertainties.

Potential threats to impartiality in an audit context include familiarity (having a close relationship with the auditee), intimidation (being coerced or feeling pressured), and self-audit (auditing one’s own work). These factors can compromise the auditor’s objectivity and the audit’s integrity. References: = The information is based on the ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group documents which discuss threats to auditor impartiality and how they may compromise an auditor’s objectivity123.

ï‚· Understanding "Context of the Organization":

The term "context of the organization" is defined in ISO 9001:2015 Clause 4.1, which states:

"The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its quality management system."

The definition emphasizes identifying both internal and external issues that influence the organization's approach to developing and achieving its objectives.

ï‚· Option Analysis:

Option A:Correct. This option aligns with the standard definition as it explicitly mentions the combination of internal and external issues that affect the organization’s approach to achieving its objectives, which is the essence of Clause 4.1.

Option B:Incorrect. The term "comparison of internal and external issues" does not reflect the ISO 9001 requirements. The standard does not require a comparison but rather an understanding of these issues.

Option C:Incorrect. Although it mentions "complexity," the focus of ISO 9001:2015 is on identifying relevant issues rather than the complexity of those issues.

Option D:Incorrect. This option mentions "coordination" and focuses only on the positive or negative effects. ISO 9001 requires identifying issues but does not emphasize coordination.

ï‚· Clause Reference and Relevance:

ISO 9001:2015 requires organizations to understand their context because internal and external factors can influence the Quality Management System's effectiveness. Understanding this context helps in:

Addressing risks and opportunities (Clause 6.1).

Aligning the QMS with the organization’s strategic direction.

ï‚· Why A is Correct:

"Combination of internal and external issues" captures the essence of Clause 4.1, making it the accurate definition of the context of the organization.

The following table shows the possible matching of the records to the requirements of clause 8.4:

Table

Requirements

Records

Define product requirements

Product specification

Criteria for selection

List of requirements to be met by the external provider

Evaluation of potential external provider

External provider questionnaire

External provider selection

Approved external provider list

Communicate requirements

Purchase order

Monitoring of performance

External provider delivery times and quality issues

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

Define the product requirements that are relevant for the external provision, such as specifications, drawings, standards, codes, etc. These should be documented and communicated to the external provider. A record of the product specification can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently. A record of the list of requirements to be met by the external provider can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed. A record of the external provider questionnaire can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved. A record of the approved external provider list can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely. A record of the purchase order can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed. A record of the external provider delivery times and quality issues can be used as evidence of this requirement.

Establishing the audit programme objectives

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities

Establishing the audit programme

Initiating the audit

Preparing all audit activity

Conducting the audit activities

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5, the audit programme is a set of one or more audits planned for a specific time frame and directed towards a specific purpose. The audit programme includes all activities necessary to plan, organize, and conduct the audits. The audit programme management involves the following steps1:

Establishing the audit programme objectives: The audit programme objectives define the intended outcomes of the audit programme, such as verifying conformity, evaluating performance, identifying improvement opportunities, etc. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization and the needs and expectations of the interested parties.

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: The audit programme risks and opportunities are the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives, such as changes in the internal or external context, availability of resources, competence of auditors, etc. The audit programme risks and opportunities should be identified, analyzed, and evaluated to determine the appropriate actions to address them.

Establishing the audit programme: The audit programme is established by defining the audit programme scope, criteria, methods, and resources. The audit programme scope defines the extent and boundaries of the audit programme, such as the processes, functions, sites, activities, etc. that will be audited. The audit programme criteria are the set of policies, procedures, or requirements used as a reference for the audits. The audit programme methods are the techniques used to conduct the audits, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc. The audit programme resources are the human, technical, and financial resources needed to implement the audit programme.

Initiating the audit: The audit initiation is the process of formally establishing the arrangements for an individual audit within the audit programme. The audit initiation involves contacting the auditee and the audit client, confirming the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, and obtaining the necessary information and access for the audit.

Preparing all audit activity: The audit preparation is the process of developing the audit plan and the audit work documents for an individual audit. The audit plan is a document that provides the basis for agreement regarding the conduct of the audit, such as the audit schedule, the audit team, the audit methods, the audit language, the audit report, etc. The audit work documents are the records that provide evidence of the audit activities, such as the audit checklist, the audit notes, the audit findings, etc.

Conducting the audit activities: The audit activities are the processes of collecting and verifying audit evidence and evaluating it against the audit criteria to make the audit conclusions. The audit activities include the opening meeting, the communication during the audit, the roles and responsibilities of the audit team and the auditee, the audit evidence collection and verification, the audit findings generation and recording, the closing meeting, and the audit report preparation and distribution.