CISM Certified Information Security Manager Question and Answers

Business impact analysis (BIA) is the process that provides the output of recovery time objectives (RTOs), which are the maximum acceptable time frames for restoring business functions or processes after a disruption. Business continuity plan (BCP) is the document that describes the strategies and procedures for ensuring the continuity of critical business functions or processes in the event of a disruption. Disaster recovery plan (DRP) is the document that describes the technical steps and resources for restoring IT systems and data in the event of a disruption. Service level agreement (SLA) is the document that defines the expectations and obligations between a service provider and a service consumer, such as availability, performance, and security. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-1/business-impact-analysis-bia-and-disaster-recovery-planning-drp https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-6/service-level-agreements-in-the-cloud

Validating the authenticity of the patch is the first step in patch management procedures when receiving an emergency security patch, as it helps to ensure that the patch is genuine and not malicious. Validating the authenticity of the patch can be done by verifying the source, signature, checksum, or certificate of the patch, and comparing it with the information provided by the software vendor or manufacturer. Installing an unverified patch may introduce malware, compromise the system, or cause unexpected errors or conflicts.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3131; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.42; Practical Patch Management and Mitigation1; Vulnerability and patch management in the CISSP exam3

Defining control requirements is the next step to ensure the security policy framework encompasses the new business model because it is a process of identifying and specifying the security measures and standards that are needed to protect the data and applications accessed by the BYOD devices. Defining control requirements helps to establish the baseline security level and expectations for the BYOD strategy, as well as to align them with the business objectives and risks. Therefore, defining control requirements is the correct answer.

Enforcing technical security standards is the most effective way to ensure that a new server is appropriately secured because it ensures that the server complies with the organization’s security policies and best practices, such as encryption, authentication, patching, and hardening. Performing secure code reviews is not relevant for securing a new server, unless it is running custom applications that need to be verified for security flaws. Conducting penetration testing is not sufficient for securing a new server, because it only identifies vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers, but does not fix them. Initiating security scanning is not sufficient for securing a new server, because it only detects known vulnerabilities or misconfigurations, but does not enforce security standards or remediate issues. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-3/secure-code-review https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

According to the CISM Review Manual, performing a risk assessment is the most important course of action for an information security manager during the due diligence phase of an acquisition, as it helps to identify and evaluate the potential threats, vulnerabilities and impacts that may affect the information assets of the target organization. A risk assessment also provides the basis for performing a gap analysis, reviewing the information security policies and awareness, and developing a remediation plan.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.4.1, page 1411.

The primary purpose for the long-term plan for the information security program is to ensure controls align with security needs. This is because the long-term plan provides a strategic vision and direction for the information security program, and defines the goals, objectives, and initiatives that support the organization’s mission, vision, and values. The long-term plan also helps to identify and prioritize the security risks and opportunities that may arise in the future, and to align the information security controls with the changing business and technology environment. The long-term plan also facilitates the allocation and optimization of the resources and budget for the information security program, and enables the measurement and evaluation of the program’s performance and value.

The long-term plan provides a strategic vision and direction for the information security program, and defines the goals, objectives, and initiatives that support the organization’s mission, vision, and values. The long-term plan also helps to identify and prioritize the security risks and opportunities that may arise in the future, and to align the information security controls with the changing business and technology environment. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.1.1, page 1261; CISM domain 3: Information security program development and management [2022 update] | Infosec2; CISM: Information Security Program Development and Management Part 1 Online, Self-Paced3

 Information security is the most critical function when initiating the removal of system access for terminated employees, as it is responsible for ensuring that the access rights of the employees are revoked in a timely and effective manner, and that the security of the organization’s data and systems is maintained. Information security should coordinate with other functions, such as HR, legal, and help desk, to implement the access removal process, but it is the primary function that has the authority and capability to disable or delete the access credentials of the terminated employees. The other options are not as critical as information security, as they may have different roles or responsibilities in the access removal process, or they may not have direct access to the systems or tools that control the access rights of the employees. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 114: “Information security is responsible for ensuring that access rights are revoked in a timely and effective manner.”

SOC 2 Controls: Access Removal for Terminated or Transferred Users, snippets: “Systems access that is no longer required for terminated or transferred users is removed within one business day. For terminated employees, access to key IT systems is revoked in a timely manner. A termination checklist and ticket are completed, and access is revoked for employees as a component of the employee termination process.”

IT Involvement in Employee Termination, A Checklist, snippets: “Disable all network access. If your company uses a master access list of active passwords, tell the system to deny any passcodes associated with the user being terminated. If your system doesn’t have a deny function, delete the user and their associated passwords. Monitor employee access.”

Human resources (HR) is the most critical function when initiating the removal of system access for terminated employees because it is responsible for notifying the relevant parties, such as information security, help desk, and legal, of the employee’s termination status and date. HR also ensures that the employee’s exit process is completed and documented, and that the employee returns any company-owned devices or assets. HR also coordinates with the employee’s manager and team to ensure a smooth transition of work and responsibilities.

After implementing controls, performing a vulnerability assessment is the best way to verify that all previously identified weaknesses have been addressed. The CISM Review Manual specifies that vulnerability assessments systematically scan for known vulnerabilities and confirm remediation effectiveness. Penetration testing is valuable but is typically used to exploit vulnerabilities, not comprehensively verify their remediation as efficiently as vulnerability assessments.

Senior management support is essential to ensuring effective incident response because it provides the necessary authority, resources, and guidance for the information security team to perform their roles and responsibilities. Senior management support also helps to establish the goals, scope, policies, and procedures for the incident response plan (IRP), as well as to ensure its alignment with the business objectives and strategy. Senior management support also fosters a culture of security awareness, accountability, and collaboration among all stakeholders involved in the incident response process.

The other options are not essential to ensuring effective incident response, although they may be helpful or beneficial. A business continuity plan (BCP) is a document that outlines the actions and arrangements to ensure the continuity of critical business functions in the event of a disruption or disaster. A cost-benefit analysis is a method of comparing the costs and benefits of different alternatives or solutions to a problem. A classification scheme is a system of categorizing information assets based on their sensitivity, value, and criticality.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 6: Incident Response Planning (IRP), Section 6.1: Incident Response Plan2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: 4

 A recovery point objective (RPO) is required in a disaster recovery plan (DRP), because it indicates the earliest point in time to which it is acceptable to recover data after a disaster. It effectively quantifies the permissible amount of data loss in case of interruption. It is determined based on the acceptable data loss in case of disruption of operations1. A DRP is a document that defines the procedures, resources, and actions to restore the critical IT systems and data in the event of a disaster that affects the normal operations of the organization2. A DRP should include the RPO for each critical system and data, as well as the backup and restoration methods, frequency, and location to achieve the RPO3.

A RPO is not required in an information security plan, an incident response plan, or a business continuity plan (BCP), because these plans have different purposes and scopes. An information security plan is a document that defines the objectives, policies, standards, and guidelines for information security management in the organization4. An incident response plan is a document that defines the procedures, roles, and responsibilities for identifying, analyzing, responding to, and learning from security incidents that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets. A BCP is a document that defines the procedures, resources, and actions to ensure the continuity of the essential business functions and processes in the event of a disruption that affects the normal operations of the organization. These plans may include other metrics, such as recovery time objective (RTO), which is the amount of time after a disaster in which business operation is resumed, or resources are again available for use, but they do not require a RPO.

References = 1: IS Disaster Recovery Objectives – RunModule 2: Information System Contingency Planning Guidance - ISACA 3: CISM Certified Information Security Manager – Question1411 4: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, page 23. : CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, page 223. : CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, page 199. : RTO vs. RPO – What is the difference? - Advisera

The best way to help ensure alignment of the information security program with organizational objectives is A. Establish an information security steering committee. This is because an information security steering committee is a cross-functional group of senior executives and managers who provide strategic direction, oversight, and support for the information security program. An information security steering committee can help to ensure that the information security program is aligned with the organizational objectives by:

Communicating and promoting the vision, mission, and value of information security to the organization and its stakeholders

Defining and approving the information security policies, standards, and procedures

Establishing and monitoring the information security goals, metrics, and performance indicators

Allocating and prioritizing the resources and budget for information security initiatives and projects

Resolving any conflicts or issues that may arise between the information security function and the business units

Reviewing and endorsing the information security risk assessment and treatment plans

Ensuring compliance with the legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations regarding information security

An information security steering committee is a cross-functional group of senior executives and managers who provide strategic direction, oversight, and support for the information security program. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.2, page 20; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 9, page 3; Information Security Governance: Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd Edition

Requiring regular reporting from the IT service provider is the best way to ensure compliance with the organization’s information security requirements, as it allows the organization to monitor the performance, security incidents, service levels, and compliance status of the IT service provider. Reporting also helps to identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

 An organization-wide social media policy is a document that defines the rules and guidelines for using social media platforms within the organization. It covers topics such as who can use social media, what they can post, how they should protect confidential information, and what are the consequences for violating the policy. An organization-wide social media policy helps to mitigate the risk of confidential information being disclosed by employees on social media by providing a clear and consistent framework for managing social media activities12.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 271 2: CISM Review Manual (Print Version), page 271

Documenting the chain of custody is the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal because it ensures the integrity, authenticity, and admissibility of the evidence collected from the incident. The chain of custody is the process of documenting the history of the evidence, including its identification, collection, preservation, transportation, analysis, storage, and presentation in court. The chain of custody should include information such as the date, time, location, description, source, owner, handler, and purpose of each evidence item, as well as any changes, modifications, or transfers that occurred to the evidence. Documenting the chain of custody can help to prevent the evidence from being tampered with, altered, lost, or destroyed, and to demonstrate that the evidence is relevant, reliable, and original12. Contacting law enforcement (A) is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a possible or optional step depending on the nature, severity, and jurisdiction of the incident. Contacting law enforcement may help to obtain legal assistance, guidance, or support, but it may also involve risks such as loss of control, confidentiality, or reputation. Therefore, contacting law enforcement should be done after careful consideration of the legal obligations, contractual agreements, and organizational policies12. Capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities © is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a technical step that should be done after documenting the chain of custody. Capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities may help to preserve the state of the systems or networks involved in the incident, but it may also introduce changes or errors that could compromise the validity or quality of the evidence. Therefore, capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities should be done using forensically sound methods and tools, and following the documented chain of custody12. Rebooting affected machines in a secure area to search for evidence (D) is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a technical step that should be done after documenting the chain of custody. Rebooting affected machines in a secure area may help to isolate and analyze the systems or networks involved in the incident, but it may also cause the loss or alteration of the evidence, such as volatile memory, temporary files, or logs. Therefore, rebooting affected machines in a secure area should be done with caution and following the documented chain of custody12. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 310-3111; 2: CISM Domain 4: Information Security Incident Management (ISIM) [2022 update]2

When a risk is determined to be below the organization’s risk appetite, the most appropriate course of action is to formally accept the risk. Risk acceptance is a valid and cost-effective strategy when the impact and likelihood are within acceptable limits, and the cost of mitigation outweighs the potential loss.

"Risk acceptance is an appropriate response when the level of residual risk is within the organization’s defined risk tolerance and appetite.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Response and Mitigation*

Avoidance, transfer, or mitigation may be overreactions that waste resources in this context.

The explanation given in the manual is:

Incident classification criteria enable an organization to prioritize incidents based on their impact and urgency. This allows for an optimized allocation of recovery resources to minimize business disruption and ensure timely restoration of normal operations. The other choices are benefits of incident management but not directly related to incident classification criteria.

= The most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture is that the responsibility for security rests with all employees, not just the information security function or the management. A security risk-aware culture is a collective mindset of the people in the organization working every day to protect the enterprise and its information assets from internal and external threats. A security risk-aware culture requires the workforce to know the security risks and the processes for avoiding or mitigating them, and to make thoughtful decisions that align with security policies and standards. A security risk-aware culture also incorporates a broader corporate culture of day-to-day actions that encourage employees to report security incidents, share security best practices, and participate in security awareness and training programs. A security risk-aware culture helps to reduce the human factor that causes 90 percent of all cyberattacks, and to offset the impact of corrupted or lost data, decreased revenue, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. A security risk-aware culture turns people from assets that must be protected into assets that actively contribute to the cybersecurity and risk management posture and elevate security to being a business enabler rather than a business impediment123.

Personal information requires different security controls than sensitive information is a true statement, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. Personal information is any information that can identify or relate to a natural person, such as name, address, email, phone number, social security number, etc. Sensitive information is any information that is confidential, proprietary, or has a high value or impact to the organization, such as trade secrets, financial data, customer data, intellectual property, etc. Different types of information may have different legal, regulatory, contractual, or ethical obligations to protect them from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction. Therefore, different security controls may be applied to personal and sensitive information based on their classification, such as encryption, access control, retention, disposal, etc. However, this message does not address the broader concept of security risk-aware culture, which is not limited to information classification and protection, but also encompasses the behaviors, attitudes, and values of the employees towards security.

Employee access should be based on the principle of least privilege is a good practice, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. The principle of least privilege states that users should only have the minimum level of access and permissions that are necessary to perform their job functions, and no more. This principle helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate actions, such as data leakage, fraud, sabotage, etc., by limiting the exposure and impact of user activities. However, this message does not capture the essence of security risk-aware culture, which is not only about access control, but also about the awareness, understanding, and commitment of the employees to security.

Understanding an information asset’s value is critical to risk management is a valid point, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. Understanding an information asset’s value is essential to determine the potential impact and likelihood of a security risk, and to prioritize the appropriate risk response strategies, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. However, this message does not reflect the holistic nature of security risk-aware culture, which is not only about risk assessment, but also about risk communication, risk treatment, and risk monitoring. References =

Building a Culture of Security - ISACA2

The Risk-Conscious, Security-Aware Culture: The Forgotten Critical Security Control - Cisco3

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA4

Ensuring security requirements are defined at the request-for-proposal (RFP) stage is the most effective security outcome in an organization’s contract management process because it establishes and communicates the security expectations and obligations for both parties, and enables the organization to evaluate and select the most suitable and secure vendor or service provider. Performing vendor security benchmark analyses at the RFP stage is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves comparing and ranking different vendors or service providers based on their security capabilities or performance. Extending security assessment to cover asset disposal on contract termination is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves verifying and validating that any assets or data belonging to the organization are securely disposed of by the vendor or service provider at the end of the contract. Extending security assessment to include random penetration testing is not an effective security outcome, but rather a possible security activity that involves testing and auditing the vendor’s or service provider’s security controls or systems at random intervals during the contract. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-1/data-ownership-and-custodianship-in-the-cloud https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/integrating-assurance-functions

 The number of business objectives directly supported by information security initiatives is the best indication of information security strategy alignment with the organizational goals and objectives. This metric shows how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy, and how effectively the information security program is delivering value to the organization. The more business objectives that are supported by information security initiatives, the more aligned the information security strategy is with the organizational goals and objectives.

The other options are not the best indicators of information security strategy alignment, as they do not directly measure the impact or contribution of information security initiatives to the business objectives. The percentage of information security incidents resolved within defined SLAs is a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the incident management process, but it does not reflect how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy. The percentage of corporate budget allocated to information security initiatives is a measure of the investment and commitment of the organization to information security, but it does not indicate how well the information security initiatives are aligned with the business objectives or how they are prioritized. The number of business executives who have attended information security awareness sessions is a measure of the awareness and involvement of the senior management in information security, but it does not show how well the information security strategy is aligned with the business strategy or how it supports the business objectives. References =

CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA, Domain 1, Task 1.1

CISM MASTER CHEAT SHEET - SkillCertPro, Chapter 1, page 2

Certified Information Security Manager (CISM), page 1

Certified Information Security Manager Exam Prep Guide: Aligned with …, page 1

CISM: Certified Information Security SKILLS COVERED Manager, page 1

The primary basis for establishing metrics that measure the effectiveness of an information security program should be the risk tolerance of the organization, which is the degree of risk that the organization is willing to accept or avoid in pursuit of its objectives. Metrics based on risk tolerance can help to evaluate whether the information security program is aligned with the business strategy, supports the risk management process, and delivers value to the organization. Residual risk, regulatory requirements, and control objectives are also important factors to consider when developing metrics, but they are not as fundamental as the risk tolerance.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 69

Labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely. Security classification is a process of categoriz-ing information based on its level of sensitivity and importance, and applying appropri-ate security controls based on the level of risk associated with that infor-mation1. Labeling is a process of marking the information with the appropriate classifi-cation level, such as public, internal, confidential, secret, or top secret2. The purpose of labeling is to inform the users of the information about its value and protection re-quirements, and to guide them on how to handle it securely. Labeling can help users to:

•Identify the information they are dealing with and its classification level

•Understand their roles and responsibilities regarding the information

•Follow the security policies and procedures for the information

•Avoid unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, or destruction of the information

•Report any security incidents or breaches involving the information

Labeling can also help organizations to:

•Track and monitor the information and its usage

•Enforce access controls and encryption for the information

•Audit and review the compliance with security standards and regulations for the infor-mation

•Educate and train employees and stakeholders on information security awareness and best practices

Therefore, labeling information according to its security classification enhances the likelihood of people handling information securely, as it increases their awareness and accountability, and supports the implementation of security measures. The other op-tions are not the primary benefits of labeling information according to its security clas-sification. Reducing the number and type of countermeasures required is not a benefit, but rather a consequence of applying security controls based on the classification lev-el. Reducing the need to identify baseline controls for each classification is not a bene-fit, but rather a prerequisite for labeling information according to its security classifica-tion. Affecting the consequences if information is handled insecurely is not a benefit, but rather a risk that needs to be managed by implementing appropriate security con-trols and incident response procedures. References: 1: Information Classification - Ad-visera 2: Information Classification in Information Security - GeeksforGeeks : Infor-mation Security Policy - NIST : Information Security Classification Framework - Queensland Government

= The best way to ensure that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) can be carried out in an emergency is to provide annual disaster recovery training to the appropriate staff, such as the disaster recovery team, the business process owners, and the IT staff. Disaster recovery training is a process of educating and preparing the staff for their roles, responsibilities, and actions in the event of a disaster that affects the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the information assets and systems that support the business processes and functions. Disaster recovery training can help to ensure that the staff are aware, capable, and confident to execute the DRP, as well as to minimize the impact and damage to the business continuity, reputation, and value. Disaster recovery training can also help to evaluate the adequacy, accuracy, and applicability of the DRP, as well as to identify and address any gaps, weaknesses, or errors that could hinder or compromise the disaster recovery process. Disaster recovery training can also help to document and report the training details, activities, and outcomes, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the DRP and the training process.

Storing disaster recovery documentation in a public cloud, maintaining an outsourced contact center in another country, and requiring disaster recovery documentation be stored with all key decision makers are all possible ways to ensure the availability and accessibility of the DRP in an emergency, but they are not the best ones. Storing disaster recovery documentation in a public cloud is a process of using a third-party service provider to store and manage the DRP documents online, which can offer benefits such as scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, but also risks such as data breach, data loss, or service disruption. Maintaining an outsourced contact center in another country is a process of using a third-party service provider to handle the communication and coordination of the disaster recovery process with the internal and external stakeholders, such as the customers, partners, or regulators, which can offer benefits such as redundancy, reliability, and expertise, but also risks such as cultural, legal, or contractual issues. Requiring disaster recovery documentation be stored with all key decision makers is a process of ensuring that the senior management and the business process owners have a copy of the DRP documents, which can offer benefits such as accountability, authority, and visibility, but also risks such as inconsistency, duplication, or unauthorized access. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 233-2341; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1602

= According to the CISM Review Manual, the information security manager should actively engage with stakeholders to align security and business goals. This means understanding the business needs, expectations, and risk appetite of the stakeholders, and communicating the value and benefits of security initiatives to them. By engaging with stakeholders, the information security manager can also gain their support and commitment for security programs and projects, and ensure that security objectives are aligned with business strategy and priorities. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, page 23.

The first step when a new vulnerability is identified is to re-evaluate the risk associated with the vulnerability. This may require an update to the risk assessment and the implementation of additional controls. Informing senior management of the vulnerability is important, but should not be the first step. Implementing compensating controls may also be necessary, but again, should not be the first step. Asking the business owner for a remediation plan may be useful, but only after the risk has been re-evaluated.

The information security manager should first re-evaluate the risk posed by the new vulnerability to determine its impact and likelihood. Based on this assessment, appropriate actions can be taken such as informing senior management, implementing compensating controls, or requesting a remediation plan from the business owner. The other choices are possible actions but not necessarily the first one.

A vulnerability is a weakness that can be exploited by an attacker to compromise a system or network2. A vulnerability can affect key data processing systems within an organization if it exposes sensitive information, disrupts business operations, or damages assets2. A vulnerability assessment is a process of identifying and evaluating vulnerabilities and their potential consequences2

“A successful security program requires management support and involvement. One of the key aspects of management support is to decide on the value of assets and the acceptable level of risk for them. This will help define the security objectives and priorities for the program. The other options are possible activities within a security program, but they are not as important as management decision on asset value.”

A data classification framework (C) is the foundational step for privacy compliance because organizations must first understand what data they have, its sensitivity, and how it is regulated. Privacy obligations vary by data type (e.g., personal, sensitive, regulated), and classification enables appropriate handling, protection, retention, and access controls. Awareness training (A), SIEM (B), and DLP (D) are all valuable controls, but they are ineffective or misaligned without knowing which data requires protection and at what level. CISM governance guidance emphasizes that compliance and control selection must be risk- and data-driven, making classification an essential prerequisite for privacy programs.

A red team exercise is a simulated cyber attack conducted by a group of ethical hackers or security experts (the red team) against an organization’s network, systems, and staff (the blue team) to test the organization’s ability to detect, respond, and recover from a real cyber attack. A red team exercise provides an information security manager with the most accurate indication of the organization’s ability to respond to a cyber attack, because it mimics the tactics, techniques, and procedures of real threat actors, and challenges the organization’s security posture, incident response plan, and security awareness in a realistic and adversarial scenario12. A red team exercise can measure the following aspects of the organization’s cyber attack response capability3:

The effectiveness and efficiency of the security controls and processes in preventing, detecting, and mitigating cyber attacks

The readiness and performance of the incident response team and other stakeholders in following the incident response plan and procedures

The communication and coordination among the internal and external parties involved in the incident response process

The resilience and recovery of the critical assets and functions affected by the cyber attack

The lessons learned and improvement opportunities identified from the cyber attack simulation

The other options, such as a walk-through of the incident response plan, a black box penetration test, or a simulated phishing exercise, are not as accurate as a red team exercise in indicating the organization’s ability to respond to a cyber attack, because they have the following limitations4 :

A walk-through of the incident response plan is a theoretical and hypothetical exercise that involves reviewing and discussing the incident response plan and procedures with the relevant stakeholders, without actually testing them in a live environment. A walk-through can help to familiarize the participants with the incident response roles and responsibilities, and to identify any gaps or inconsistencies in the plan, but it cannot measure the actual performance and effectiveness of the incident response process under a real cyber attack scenario.

A black box penetration test is a technical and targeted exercise that involves testing the security of a specific system or application, without any prior knowledge or access to its internal details or configuration. A black box penetration test can help to identify the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of the system or application, and to simulate the perspective and behavior of an external attacker, but it cannot test the security of the entire network or organization, or the response of the incident response team and other stakeholders to a cyber attack.

A simulated phishing exercise is a social engineering and awareness exercise that involves sending fake emails or messages to the organization’s staff, to test their ability to recognize and report phishing attempts. A simulated phishing exercise can help to measure the level of security awareness and training of the staff, and to simulate one of the most common cyber attack vectors, but it cannot test the security of the network or systems, or the response of the incident response team and other stakeholders to a cyber attack.

References = 1: What is a Red Team Exercise? | Redscan 2: Red Team vs Blue Team: How They Differ and Why You Need Both | CISA 3: Red Team Exercises: What They Are and How to Run Them | Rapid7 4: What is a Walkthrough Test? | Definition and Examples | ISACA : Penetration Testing Types: Black Box, White Box, and Gray Box | CISA

The best first step is to assess the control state to determine why it is ineffective and whether adjustments, replacements, or compensating controls are needed.

“Regularly assess the effectiveness of security controls to ensure they are providing the intended level of protection.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Control Monitoring and Assessment*

ISACA practice questions stress that assessing the control state comes before taking further action.

 Server-based malware protection is not enforced is the issue that would be of GREATEST concern to an information security manager, as it exposes the web-based application and its data to potential threats from malicious software that can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information. Server-based malware protection is a security control that monitors and blocks malicious activities on the server where the application runs, such as viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, etc. Without server-based malware protection, the web-based application may be vulnerable to attacks that can damage or destroy the data stored on the server, or disrupt the normal functioning of the application. The other issues are also important, but not as critical as server-based malware protection. The application does not use a secure communications protocol may expose sensitive data in transit to eavesdropping or interception by unauthorized parties. The application is configured with restrictive access controls may limit the access rights of legitimate users to authorized resources, but it does not prevent unauthorized users from accessing them through other means. The business process has only one level of error checking may result in incorrect or inconsistent data entry or processing, but it does not guarantee data quality or accuracy. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1751; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 812

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation = The impact on the risk culture is the greatest concern for the information security manager, because it reflects the attitude and behavior of the organization towards risk management. If management accepts an operational risk that compromises a critical monitoring process, it may indicate a lack of awareness, commitment, or accountability for risk management. This may erode the trust and confidence of the stakeholders, regulators, and customers, and expose the organization to further risks. The impact on compliance risk, the inability to determine short-term impact, and the deviation from risk management best practices are also important, but they are secondary to the impact on the risk culture.

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 48. CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, question ID 421.

According to the CISM Review Manual, key risk indicators (KRIs) are the most important information to include in an information security status report to senior management, as they provide a measure of the current level of risk exposure and the effectiveness of the risk management activities. KRIs also help to identify trends, patterns and emerging risks that may require management attention or action.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2, page 209

The best way for an information security manager to improve the effectiveness of an organization’s information security program is to collaborate with business and IT functions in determining controls. Collaboration is a key factor for ensuring that the information security program is aligned with the organization’s business objectives, risk appetite, and security strategy, and that it supports the business processes and activities. Collaboration also helps to gain the buy-in, involvement, and ownership of the business and IT functions, who are the primary stakeholders and users of the information security program. Collaboration also facilitates the communication, coordination, and integration of the information security program across the organization, and enables the information security manager to understand the needs, expectations, and challenges of the business and IT functions, and to propose the most appropriate and effective security controls and solutions.

Focusing on addressing conflicts between security and performance (A) is a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. Security and performance are often competing or conflicting goals, as security controls may introduce overhead, complexity, or delays that affect the efficiency, usability, or availability of the systems or processes. Addressing these conflicts may help to optimize the balance and trade-off between security and performance, and to enhance the user satisfaction and acceptance of the security controls. However, focusing on addressing conflicts between security and performance does not necessarily improve the alignment, integration, or communication of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the involvement or ownership of the stakeholders.

Including information security requirements in the change control process © is also a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. The change control process is a process that manages the initiation, approval, implementation, and review of changes to the systems or processes, such as enhancements, updates, or fixes. Including information security requirements in the change control process may help to ensure that the changes do not introduce new or increased security risks or impacts, and that they comply with the security policies, standards, and procedures. However, including information security requirements in the change control process does not necessarily improve the collaboration, communication, or coordination of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the buy-in or involvement of the stakeholders.

Obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls (D) is also a possible way to improve the effectiveness of an information security program, but not the best one. Automated security controls are security controls that are implemented by using software, hardware, or other technologies, such as encryption, firewalls, or antivirus, to perform security functions or tasks without human intervention. Obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls may help to improve the efficiency, consistency, or reliability of the security controls, and to reduce the human errors, negligence, or malicious actions. However, obtaining assistance from IT to implement automated security controls does not necessarily improve the collaboration, communication, or integration of the information security program with the business and IT functions, nor does it ensure the ownership or involvement of the stakeholders.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy Development, Subsection: Collaboration, page 24-251

The answer to the question is A. Classification model. This is because a classification model is a system of assigning labels or categories to information assets based on their value, sensitivity, and criticality to the organization. A classification model helps to ensure consistent protection for the organization’s information assets by:

Providing a common language and criteria for defining and communicating the security requirements and expectations for the information assets

Enabling the identification and prioritization of the information assets that need the most protection and resources

Facilitating the implementation and enforcement of the appropriate level of security controls and measures for the information assets, based on their classification

Supporting the compliance with the legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations regarding the information assets, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

A classification model is a system of assigning labels or categories to information assets based on their value, sensitivity, and criticality to the organization. A classification model helps to ensure consistent protection for the organization’s information assets by providing a common language and criteria for defining and communicating the security requirements and expectations for the information assets, enabling the identification and prioritization of the information assets that need the most protection and resources, facilitating the implementation and enforcement of the appropriate level of security controls and measures for the information assets, based on their classification, and supporting the compliance with the legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations regarding the information assets. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.2.1, page 751; CISA Domain 5 - Protection of Information Assets2; CISM domain 3: Information security program development and management [2022 update]3; CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update]4

= Initiating the organization’s incident response process is the best course of action for the information security manager when a cloud application used by the organization is found to have a serious vulnerability. The incident response process is a set of predefined steps and procedures that aim to contain, analyze, resolve, and learn from security incidents. The information security manager should follow the incident response process to ensure that the vulnerability is properly reported, assessed, mitigated, and communicated to the relevant stakeholders. The incident response process should also involve the cloud service provider (CSP) and the business owner of the application, as they are responsible for the security and functionality of the cloud application. Instructing the vendor to conduct penetration testing, suspending the connection to the application in the firewall, and reporting the situation to the business owner of the application are all possible actions that may be taken as part of the incident response process, but they are not the best initial course of action. Penetration testing may help to identify the root cause and the impact of the vulnerability, but it may also cause further damage or disruption to the cloud application. Suspending the connection to the application in the firewall may prevent unauthorized access or exploitation of the vulnerability, but it may also affect the availability and continuity of the cloud application. Reporting the situation to the business owner of the application is an important step to inform them of the risk and the potential business impact, but it is not sufficient to address the vulnerability and its consequences. Therefore, the information security manager should initiate the incident response process as the best course of action, and then perform the other actions as appropriate based on the incident response plan and the risk assessment. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 211 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

An assessment of the current operating system based on risk (A) is most effective for gaining senior management support because CISM emphasizes risk-based decision-making at the executive level. Senior management is primarily concerned with exposure, potential impact, and alignment with risk appetite—not technical features or user convenience. Performance improvements (B), user surveys (C), and feature lists (D) provide supporting detail but do not clearly articulate business risk. A risk-based assessment demonstrates why the upgrade is necessary to reduce unacceptable risk.

To effectively manage an organization’s information security risk, it is most important to establish and communicate risk tolerance, which is the level of risk that the organization is willing to accept or bear. By establishing and communicating risk tolerance, the organization can align its risk management strategy and objectives with its business goals and values, and ensure that the risk management activities and decisions are consistent and appropriate across the organization.

= Information classification is the process of assigning appropriate labels to information assets based on their sensitivity and value to the organization. Information classification should be aligned with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization, and should be reviewed periodically to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The information security manager is responsible for establishing and maintaining the information classification policy and procedures, as well as providing guidance and oversight to the data owners and custodians. Data owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information assets within their business unit or function. Data owners are responsible for determining the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, as well as ensuring compliance with the information classification policy and procedures. Data custodians are the individuals who have the operational responsibility for implementing and maintaining the security controls for the information assets assigned to them by the data owners.

If the information security manager believes that information has been classified inappropriately, increasing the risk of a breach, the best action is to complete a risk assessment and refer the results to the data owners. A risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks associated with the information assets, and recommending appropriate risk treatment options. By conducting a risk assessment, the information security manager can provide objective and evidence-based information to the data owners, highlighting the potential impact and likelihood of a breach, as well as the cost and benefit of implementing additional security controls. This will enable the data owners to make informed decisions about the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, and to justify and document any deviations from the information classification policy and procedures.

The other options are not the best actions for the information security manager. Refering the issue to internal audit for a recommendation is not the best action, because internal audit is an independent and objective assurance function that provides assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes. Internal audit is not responsible for providing recommendations on information classification, which is a management responsibility. Re-classifying the data and increasing the security level to meet business risk is not the best action, because the information security manager does not have the authority or accountability for the information assets, and may not have the full understanding of the business context and objectives of the data owners. Instructing the relevant system owners to reclassify the data is not the best action, because system owners are not the same as data owners, and may not have the authority or accountability for the information assets either. System owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information systems that process, store, or transmit the information assets. System owners are responsible for ensuring that the information systems comply with the security requirements and controls defined by the data owners and the information security manager. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 49-51, 63-64, 69-701; CISM Online Review Course, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Module 2: Information Security Program Framework, ISACA2

 = An identity and access management (IAM) system is a set of processes, policies, and technologies that enable an organization to manage the identities and access rights of its users across different systems and applications1. An IAM system can help an organization to comply with the government regulation by automating the provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts, enforcing consistent access policies, and integrating different user directories2. An IAM system can also provide audit trails and reports to demonstrate compliance with the regulation3. A multi-factor authentication (MFA) system is a method of verifying the identity of a user by requiring two or more factors, such as something the user knows, has, or is4. An MFA system can enhance the security of user authentication, but it does not address the issue of removing user privileges from different systems within three days of termination. A privileged access management (PAM) system is a solution that manages and monitors the access of privileged users, such as administrators, to critical systems and resources. A PAM system can reduce the risk of unauthorized or malicious use of privileged accounts, but it does not solve the problem of managing the access of regular users across different systems. A governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system is a software platform that integrates the functions of governance, risk management, and compliance management. A GRC system can help an organization to align its objectives, policies, and processes with the relevant regulations, standards, and best practices, but it does not directly enable the removal of user privileges from different systems within three days of termination. References = 1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 24 2: 1 3: 2 4: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 25 : CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 26 : CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 27

A new security project is more likely to be approved if it aligns with the organization’s goals, objectives, and strategies. This shows that the project supports the business needs and adds value to the organization. Organizational alignment is one of the key elements of a business case for information security, as stated in the CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition1, page 41. IT strategy alignment, threats to the organization, and existing control costs are also important factors to consider, but they are not as persuasive as organizational alignment in obtaining approval for a new security project. References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition by Isaca (Author)

Learn more:

1. isaca.org2. amazon.com3. gov.uk

Communicating the changes to stakeholders is the next step after updating and publishing the information security policy and standards, as it ensures that the stakeholders are aware of the new or revised requirements, expectations and responsibilities, and can provide feedback or raise concerns if needed. Communication also helps to promote the acceptance and adoption of the policy and standards, and to reinforce the security culture and awareness within the organization. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

 A capability maturity model (CMM) is a framework that helps organizations assess and improve their processes and capabilities in various domains, such as software development, project management, information security, and others1. A CMM defines a set of levels or stages that represent the degree of maturity or effectiveness of an organization’s processes and capabilities in a specific domain. Each level has a set of criteria or characteristics that an organization must meet to achieve that level of maturity. A CMM also provides guidance and best practices on how to progress from one level to another, and how to measure and monitor the performance and improvement of the processes and capabilities2.

A CMM is most helpful in determining an organization’s current capacity to mitigate risks, because it provides a systematic and objective way to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the organization’s processes and capabilities related to risk management. A CMM can help an organization identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement in its risk management practices, and prioritize the actions and resources needed to address them. A CMM can also help an organization benchmark its risk management maturity against industry standards or best practices, and demonstrate its compliance with regulatory or contractual requirements3.

The other options are not as helpful as a CMM in determining an organization’s current capacity to mitigate risks, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on a CMM. A vulnerability assessment is a process of identifying and analyzing the vulnerabilities in an organization’s systems, networks, or applications, and their potential impact on the organization’s assets, operations, or reputation. A vulnerability assessment can help an organization identify the sources and levels of risk, but it does not provide a comprehensive or holistic view of the organization’s risk management maturity or effectiveness4. IT security risk and exposure is a measure of the likelihood and impact of a security breach or incident on an organization’s IT assets, operations, or reputation. IT security risk and exposure can help an organization quantify and communicate the level of risk, but it does not provide a framework or guidance on how to improve the organization’s risk management processes or capabilities5. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of a disruption or disaster on an organization’s critical business functions, processes, or resources. A BIA can help an organization determine the priorities and requirements for business continuity and disaster recovery, but it does not provide a method or standard for assessing or enhancing the organization’s risk management maturity or effectiveness. References = 1: CMMI Institute - What is CMMI? - Capability Maturity Model Integration 2: Capability Maturity Model and Risk Register Integration: The Right … 3: Performing Risk Assessments of Emerging Technologies - ISACA 4: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2 5: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.4

Declaring an incident is the best course of action when confidential information is inadvertently disseminated outside the organization, as it triggers the incident response process, which aims to contain, analyze, eradicate, recover, and learn from the incident. Declaring an incident also helps to communicate the exposure to the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, legal authorities, customers, or regulators, and to comply with the applicable laws and regulations regarding notification and disclosure. Changing the encryption keys, reviewing compliance requirements, or communicating the exposure are possible steps within the incident response process, but they are not the first course of action.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3121; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.12; CISM 2020: Incident Management; How to Respond to a Data Breach

 A gap assessment is the best way to demonstrate that an information security program provides appropriate coverage, as it compares the current state of the information security program with the desired state based on the organization’s objectives, policies, standards, and regulations. A gap assessment can identify the strengths and weaknesses of the information security program, as well as the areas that need improvement or alignment. A gap assessment can also provide recommendations and action plans to close the gaps and achieve the desired level of information security coverage.

The other options are not as good as a gap assessment, as they do not provide a comprehensive and holistic view of the information security coverage. Security risk analysis is a process to identify and evaluate the risks to the information assets and the impact of potential threats and vulnerabilities. It can help to prioritize and mitigate the risks, but it does not measure the compliance or performance of the information security program. Maturity assessment is a process to measure the level of maturity of the information security program based on a predefined model or framework. It can help to benchmark and improve the information security program, but it does not account for the specific needs and expectations of the organization. Vulnerability scan report is a document that shows the results of a scan on the network or system to identify the existing or potential vulnerabilities. It can help to validate and improve the technical security, but it does not assess the non-technical aspects of information security, such as governance, policies, or awareness. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 211-212, 215-216, 233-234, 237-238.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1015.

CISM domain 3: Information security program development and management [2022 update], Infosec Certifications, 2.

Using the VPN when accessing the organization’s online resources is the most important thing to ensure, as it provides a secure and encrypted connection between the remote employees and the organization’s network, and protects the data and systems from unauthorized access, interception, or tampering. VPNs also help to comply with the organization’s security policies and standards, and to prevent data leakage or breaches.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3081; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Knowledge Statement 4.92; CISM 2020: Remote Access Security; How to Secure Remote Workers with VPN

= Integrating security controls in each phase of the life cycle is the best way to minimize information security risk in deploying applications to the production environment. This ensures that security requirements are defined, designed, implemented, tested, and maintained throughout the development process. Conducting penetration testing post implementation, having a well-defined change process, and verifying security during the testing process are all important activities, but they are not sufficient to address all the potential risks that may arise during the application life cycle. Penetration testing may reveal some vulnerabilities, but it cannot guarantee that all of them are identified and fixed. A change process may help to control and document the modifications made to the application, but it does not ensure that the changes are secure and do not introduce new risks. Verifying security during the testing process may help to validate the functionality and performance of the security controls, but it does not ensure that the security requirements are complete and consistent with the business objectives and the risk appetite of the organization. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1121; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 1462

An intrusion detection system (IDS) is a software or hardware device that monitors network traffic and detects unauthorized or malicious activities, such as attacks, intrusions, or breaches. An IDS can provide valuable evidence for an information security team to investigate an alleged breach of an organization’s network, as it can capture and analyze the network traffic in real time or after the fact. An IDS can help to identify the source, type, scope, and impact of the breach, as well as to generate alerts and reports for further investigation.

File integrity monitoring software (FIM), security information and event management (SIEM) tool, and antivirus software are not single sources of evidence for an information security team to review. FIM software monitors files and directories on a network or system and detects changes or modifications that may indicate unauthorized access or tampering. SIEM tool collects and correlates data from various sources, such as logs, events, alerts, incidents, and threats, and provides a unified view of the security posture of an organization. Antivirus software scans files and programs on a network or system and detects malware infections that may compromise the security or functionality of the system.

However, these tools are not sufficient by themselves to provide conclusive evidence for an information security team to investigate an alleged breach of an organization’s network. They may provide some clues or indicators of compromise (IOCs), but they may also generate false positives or negatives due to various factors, such as configuration errors, user behavior, benign activities, or evasion techniques. Therefore, an information security team should use multiple sources of evidence from different tools and methods to verify the validity and reliability of the findings.

References = CISM Manual, Chapter 6: Incident Response Planning (IRP), Section 6.2: Evidence Collection1

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

The impact of noncompliance on the organization’s risk profile is the MOST important information for the information security manager to communicate to senior management, because it helps them understand the potential consequences of not adhering to the established controls and the need for corrective actions. Noncompliance may expose the organization to increased threats, vulnerabilities, and losses, as well as legal, regulatory, and contractual liabilities.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 84: “The information security manager should report on information security risk, including noncompliance and changes in information risk, to key stakeholders to facilitate the risk management decision-making process.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 85: “Noncompliance with information security policies, standards, and procedures may result in increased threats, vulnerabilities, and losses, as well as legal, regulatory, and contractual liabilities for the enterprise.”

When preventive controls to appropriately mitigate risk are not feasible, the most important action for the information security manager is to manage the impact, which means taking measures to reduce the likelihood or severity of the consequences of the risk. Managing the impact can involve using alternative controls, such as engineering, administrative, or personal protective controls, that can lower the exposure or harm to the organization. The other options, such as identifying unacceptable risk levels, assessing vulnerabilities, or evaluating potential threats, are part of the risk assessment process, but they are not actions to mitigate risk when preventive controls are not feasible. References:

https://bcmmetrics.com/risk-mitigation-evaluating-your-controls/

https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/hazard-prevention

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hierarchy/default.html

A walk-through of the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a method of testing the plan by simulating a disaster scenario and having the participants review their roles and responsibilities, as well as the procedures and resources required to execute the plan. A walk-through has the greatest positive impact on the ability to execute the DRP, as it helps to identify and resolve any gaps, errors, or inconsistencies in the plan, as well as to enhance the awareness and readiness of the stakeholders involved in the recovery process. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3.2.21

The data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility to classify, grant access, and monitor the use of the CRM data. The data owner should ensure that the data is protected according to its classification and business requirements. The data custodian is the person who implements the controls and procedures to protect the data as directed by the data owner. The information security manager is the person who advises the data owner on the best practices and standards for data security. The internal IT audit is the function that evaluates the effectiveness and compliance of the data security controls and procedures.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Roles and Responsibilities, Subsection: Data Owner, Page 23.

= After a breach where the risk has been isolated and forensic processes have been performed, the next step should be to rebuild the server from the last verified backup. This will ensure that the server is restored to a known and secure state, and that any malicious code or data that may have been injected or compromised by the attacker is removed. Rebuilding the server from the original media may not be sufficient, as it may not include the latest patches or configurations that were applied before the breach. Placing the web server in quarantine or shutting it down may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the business operations or services that depend on the server. Rebuilding the server from the last verified backup is the best option to resume normal operations while maintaining security. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 118: “Recovery is the process of restoring normal operations after an incident. Recovery activities may include rebuilding systems, restoring data, applying patches, changing passwords, and testing functionality.”

Data Breach Experts Share The Most Important Next Step You Should Take After A Data Breach in 2014 & 2015, snippet: “Restore from backup. If you have a backup of your system from before the breach, wipe your system clean and restore from backup. This will ensure that any backdoors or malware installed by the hackers are removed.”

The information security steering committee is composed of business leaders is the best indicator that information security governance and corporate governance are integrated, as this shows that the information security program is aligned with the business objectives and strategies, and that the information security manager has the support and involvement of the senior management. The information security steering committee is responsible for overseeing the information security program, setting the direction and scope, approving policies and standards, allocating resources, and monitoring performance and compliance. The information security steering committee also ensures that the information security risks are communicated and addressed at the board level, and that the information security program is consistent with the corporate governance framework and culture. The information security team is aware of business goals, the board is regularly informed of information security key performance indicators (KPIs), and a cost-benefit analysis is conducted on all information security initiatives are also important, but not as important as the information security steering committee is composed of business leaders, as they do not necessarily imply that the information security governance and corporate governance are integrated, and that the information security program has the authority and accountability to achieve its goals. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 271; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 342; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 193

 The most important factor to ensuring information stored by an organization is protected appropriately is assigning information asset ownership. Information asset ownership is the process of identifying and assigning the roles and responsibilities of the individuals or groups who have the authority and accountability for the information assets and their protection. Information asset owners are responsible for defining the business value, classification, and security requirements of the information assets, as well as granting the access rights and privileges to the information users and custodians. Information asset owners are also responsible for monitoring and reviewing the security performance and compliance of the information assets, and reporting and resolving any security issues or incidents. By assigning information asset ownership, the organization can ensure that the information assets are properly identified, categorized, protected, and managed according to their importance, sensitivity, and regulatory obligations.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Data Classification, page 331; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 62, page 572.

The best way to support the incident management process for attacks on an organization’s supply chain is to establish communication paths with vendors. This means that the organization and its vendors have clear and agreed-upon channels, methods, and protocols for exchanging information and coordinating actions in the event of an incident that affects the supply chain. Communication paths with vendors can help to identify the source, scope, and impact of the incident, as well as to share best practices, lessons learned, and recovery strategies. Communication paths with vendors can also facilitate the escalation and resolution of the incident, as well as the reporting and documentation of the incident. Communication paths with vendors are part of the incident response plan (IRP), which is a component of the information security program (ISP) 12345.

The other options are not the best ways to support the incident management process for attacks on the organization’s supply chain. Including service level agreements (SLAs) in vendor contracts can help to define the expectations and obligations of the parties involved in the supply chain, as well as the penalties for non-compliance. However, SLAs do not necessarily address the specific procedures and requirements for incident management, nor do they ensure effective communication and collaboration among the parties. Requiring security awareness training for vendor staff can help to reduce the likelihood and severity of incidents by enhancing the knowledge and skills of the vendor personnel who handle the organization’s data and systems. However, security awareness training does not guarantee that the vendor staff will follow the appropriate incident management processes, nor does it address the communication and coordination issues that may arise during an incident. Performing integration testing with vendor systems can help to ensure the compatibility and functionality of the systems that are part of the supply chain, as well as to identify and mitigate any vulnerabilities or errors that could lead to incidents. However, integration testing does not cover all the possible scenarios and risks that could affect the supply chain, nor does it provide the necessary communication and response mechanisms for incident management. References = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

https://niccs.cisa.gov/education-training/catalog/skillsoft/cism-information-security-incident-management-part-1 https://niccs.cisa.gov/education-training/catalog/skillsoft/cism-information-security-incident-management-part-1

The answer to the question is C. Risk response scenarios. This is because risk response scenarios are the predefined plans and actions that the organization will take to respond to specific types of incidents, such as cyberattacks, natural disasters, or data breaches. Risk response scenarios should be aligned with the corporate strategy, which defines the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the organization, and guides the decision-making and resource allocation processes. By aligning the risk response scenarios with the corporate strategy, the organization can ensure that the incident response plan supports the achievement of the desired outcomes and benefits, and minimizes the impact and disruption to the business operations and performance.

Risk response scenarios are the predefined plans and actions that the organization will take to respond to specific types of incidents. Risk response scenarios should be aligned with the corporate strategy, which defines the vision, mission, goals, and objectives of the organization. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.2, page 2111; CISM domain 4: Information security incident management [2022 update] | Infosec2; A Guide to Effective Incident Management Communications3

A risk analysis (D) best justifies spending on a compensating control because it quantifies or qualifies risk exposure and residual risk, providing a business-based rationale for investment. CISM stresses that control decisions must be driven by risk, not by the existence of vulnerabilities alone. Root cause analysis (A) explains why an issue occurred, vulnerability assessments (B) identify weaknesses, and emerging trends (C) provide context—but only risk analysis connects threats, vulnerabilities, impact, and likelihood to justify expenditure.

A strict change control process (C) is the most effective preventive measure because it embeds compliance with standards into the system lifecycle and operational workflow. If staff are deviating from configuration/management standards, the core issue is often lack of enforced process controls: undocumented changes, rushed fixes, inconsistent approvals, or missing validation. Formal change management ensures changes are requested, risk-assessed, approved by authorized parties, tested, implemented, and reviewed, with traceability and accountability. Annual awareness training (A) helps general understanding but is weaker than a control that prevents and detects unauthorized deviations. Vulnerability scanning (B) is detective and may identify weaknesses after the fact, but it does not ensure standards are followed. Updating configuration baselines (D) is valuable, but without change control, baselines can still be bypassed. In CISM program management, the best answer typically emphasizes repeatable, auditable processes that reduce human error and enforce governance.

 Risk management dashboards are the MOST effective in monitoring an organization’s existing risk because they provide a visual and interactive representation of the key risk indicators (KRIs) and metrics that reflect the current risk posture and performance of the organization. Risk management dashboards can help to communicate the risk information to various stakeholders, identify trends and patterns, compare actual results with targets and thresholds, and support decision making and risk response12. Periodic updates to risk register (A) are important to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the risk information, but they are not the most effective in monitoring the existing risk because they do not provide a real-time or dynamic view of the risk situation. Security information and event management (SIEM) systems © are effective in monitoring the security events and incidents that may indicate potential or actual threats to the organization, but they are not the most effective in monitoring the existing risk because they do not provide a comprehensive or holistic view of the risk context and impact. Vulnerability assessment results (D) are effective in monitoring the weaknesses and exposures of the organization’s assets and systems, but they are not the most effective in monitoring the existing risk because they do not provide a quantitative or qualitative measure of the risk likelihood and consequence. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 316-3171; 2: CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update]2

 A preventive control is a type of control that aims to prevent or reduce the occurrence or impact of potential adverse events that can affect the organization’s objectives and performance. Preventive controls are proactive measures that are implemented before an incident happens, and they are designed to address the root causes or sources of risk. Preventive controls can also help the organization to comply with the relevant laws, regulations, standards, and best practices regarding information security1.

An example of a preventive control is a redundant power supply, which is a backup or alternative source of power that can be used in case of a power outage or failure. A redundant power supply can reduce the business risk associated with critical system outages, which can result from power disruptions caused by natural disasters, technical faults, human errors, or malicious attacks. A redundant power supply can provide the following benefits for information security2:

Maintain the availability and continuity of the critical systems and services that depend on power, such as servers, databases, networks, or applications. A redundant power supply can ensure that the critical systems and services can operate normally or resume quickly after a power outage or failure, minimizing the downtime and data loss that can affect the organization’s operations, customers, or reputation.

Protect the integrity and reliability of the critical systems and data that are stored or processed by the power-dependent devices, such as computers, hard drives, or memory cards. A redundant power supply can prevent or reduce the damage or corruption of the critical systems and data that can be caused by sudden or unexpected power fluctuations, surges, or interruptions, which can compromise the accuracy, completeness, or consistency of the information.

Enhance the resilience and redundancy of the power infrastructure and network that supports the critical systems and services. A redundant power supply can provide an alternative or backup route for power delivery and distribution, which can increase the flexibility and adaptability of the power infrastructure and network to cope with different scenarios or conditions of power supply or demand.

The other options are not the type of control that is being considered by the organization. A corrective control is a type of control that aims to restore or recover the normal state or function of the affected systems or processes after an incident has occurred. A corrective control is a reactive measure that is implemented during or after an incident, and it is designed to address the consequences or impacts of risk. A corrective control can also help the organization to learn from the incident and improve its information security practices1. An example of a corrective control is a backup or restore system, which is a method of creating and restoring copies of the system or data that have been lost or damaged due to an incident.

A detective control is a type of control that aims to identify or discover the occurrence or existence of an incident or a deviation from the expected or desired state or behavior of the systems or processes. A detective control is a monitoring or auditing measure that is implemented during or after an incident, and it is designed to provide information or evidence of risk. A detective control can also help the organization to analyze or investigate the incident and determine the root cause or source of risk1. An example of a detective control is a log or alert system, which is a tool of recording or reporting the activities or events that have occurred or are occurring within the systems or processes.

A deterrent control is a type of control that aims to discourage or dissuade the potential perpetrators or sources of risk from initiating or continuing an incident or an attack. A deterrent control is a psychological or behavioral measure that is implemented before or during an incident, and it is designed to influence or manipulate the motivation or intention of risk. A deterrent control can also help the organization to reduce the likelihood or frequency of incidents or attacks1. An example of a deterrent control is a warning or notification system, which is a method of communicating or displaying the consequences or penalties of violating the information security policies or rules. References = Risk Control Techniques: Preventive, Corrective, Directive, And …, Learn Different types of Security Controls in CISSP - Eduonix Blog

Security control frameworks (e.g., ISO/IEC 27001, NIST SP 800-53, CSA Cloud Controls Matrix) provide a structured and standardized approach to assess the security posture of cloud providers. These frameworks ensure completeness and alignment with best practices.

“Standardized security frameworks enable consistent evaluation of third-party providers and alignment with industry-recognized security requirements.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Third-Party Risk Management*

Penetration test results and SLAs are useful, but only frameworks provide comprehensive coverage.

 The eradication phase of incident response is the stage where the incident response team documents and performs the actions required to remove the threat that caused the incident1. This phase involves identifying and eliminating the root cause of the incident, such as malware, compromised accounts, unauthorized access, or misconfigured systems2. The eradication phase also involves restoring the affected systems to a secure state, deleting any malicious files or artifacts, and verifying that the threat has been completely removed2. The eradication phase is the first step in returning a compromised environment to its proper state2. The other phases of incident response are:

Preparation: The phase where the incident response team prepares for potential incidents by defining roles, responsibilities, procedures, tools, and resources1.

Detection and analysis: The phase where the incident response team identifies and prioritizes the incidents based on their severity, impact, and urgency1.

Containment: The phase where the incident response team isolates the affected systems or networks to prevent the spread of the incident and minimize the damage1.

Recovery: The phase where the incident response team restores the normal operations of the systems or networks, and implements any necessary changes or improvements to prevent recurrence1.

Post-incident review: The phase where the incident response team evaluates the effectiveness of the incident response process, identifies the lessons learned, and provides recommendations for improvement1. References = 3: Critical Incident Stress Management: CISM Implementation Guidelines 2: What is the Eradication Phase of Incident Response? - RSI Security 1: Incident Response Models - ISACA

he greatest concern for an information security manager of a large multinational organization when outsourcing data processing to a cloud service provider is the local laws and regulations that may apply to the data and the cloud service provider. Local laws and regulations may vary significantly across different jurisdictions and may impose different requirements or restrictions on the data protection, privacy, security, sovereignty, retention, disclosure, transfer, or access. These laws and regulations may also create potential conflicts or inconsistencies with the organization’s own policies, standards, or contractual obligations. Therefore, an information security manager should conduct a thorough legal and regulatory analysis before outsourcing data processing to a cloud service provider and ensure that the cloud service provider complies with all the applicable laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdictions.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: Outsourcing2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: 1

Outsourcing data processing to a cloud service provider may expose the organization to different legal and regulatory requirements depending on the location of the data and the vendor. This could affect the organization’s compliance and liability in case of a breach or dispute. Therefore, the information security manager should be most concerned about the local laws and regulations that apply to the outsourcing arrangement.

Assessing the risk of noncompliance ensures that decisions are based on an understanding of the business impact and security implications.

“Before reporting or remediating, it is critical to assess the risk associated with the control bypass to make informed decisions.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment*

Entering identified risks into the organization's risk register ensures that they are documented, tracked, assigned, and addressed. Without recording in the risk register, there’s no formal mechanism to manage, treat, or monitor the risk.

“The risk register is the central repository for tracking all known risks, their status, and treatment plans.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Response and Risk Register*

= The first step that the information security manager should recommend when learning of a new standard related to an emerging technology is to determine whether the organization can benefit from adopting the new standard. This involves evaluating the business objectives, needs, and requirements of the organization, as well as the potential advantages, disadvantages, and challenges of implementing the new technology and the new standard. The information security manager should also consider the alignment of the new standard with the organization’s existing policies, procedures, and standards, as well as the impact of the new standard on the organization’s information security governance, risk management, program, and incident management. By conducting a preliminary analysis of the feasibility, suitability, and desirability of the new standard, the information security manager can provide a sound basis for further decision making and planning.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Standards, page 391; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 43, page 412.

The next thing that the information security manager should do after identifying a large volume of old data that appears to be unused is to consult the record retention policy. The record retention policy is a document that defines the types, formats, and retention periods of data that the organization needs to keep for legal, regulatory, operational, or historical purposes. By consulting the record retention policy, the information security manager can determine if the old data is still required to be stored, archived, or disposed of, and how to do so in a secure and compliant manner.

Compartmentalization is the best defense-in-depth implementation for protecting high value assets or for handling environments that have trust concerns because it is a strategy that divides the network or system into smaller segments or compartments, each with its own security policies, controls, and access rules. Compartmentalization helps to isolate and protect the most sensitive or critical data and functions from unauthorized or malicious access, as well as to limit the damage or impact of a breach or compromise. Compartmentalization also helps to enforce the principle of least privilege, which grants users or processes only the minimum access rights they need to perform their tasks. Therefore, compartmentalization is the correct answer.

 Strengthening endpoint security is the most immediate focus when shifting to a work-from-home model with an increased need for remote access security, as this reduces the risk of unauthorized access, data leakage, malware infection, and other threats that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the organization’s information assets. Moving to a zero trust access model, enabling network-level authentication, and enhancing cyber response capability are also important, but not as urgent as strengthening endpoint security, as they require more time, resources, and planning to implement effectively. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1561; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 302; ISACA CISM - iSecPrep, page 153

The biggest challenge is linking KRIs to specific risks to ensure that they accurately measure and signal potential exposures. If KRIs aren’t directly connected to real risks, they won’t effectively support risk management efforts.

“A key challenge in developing KRIs is ensuring that they are directly linked to specific risks to provide meaningful and actionable insights.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)*

ISACA’s practice questions highlight the importance of clear linkage for effective risk measurement.

The business owner is the most appropriate person to own the risk associated with the failure of a privileged access control because they are ultimately responsible for the protection and use of the information in their business unit1. The data owner is responsible for determining the access rights for specific data sets, but not for the access control mechanisms2. The information security manager is responsible for implementing and enforcing the security policies and standards, but not for owning the risk3. The compliance manager is responsible for ensuring that the organization meets the regulatory requirements, but not for owning the risk3. References: 1 https://www.cyberark.com/resources/blog/how-do-you-prioritize-risk-for-privileged-access-management 3 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-1/capability-framework-for-privileged-access-management 2 https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/218049/what-is-the-difference-between-data-owner-data-custodian-and-system-owner

The most important information for influencing management’s support of information security is an demonstration of alignment with the business strategy because it shows how information security contributes to the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and adds value to the organization’s performance and competitiveness. An identification of the overall threat landscape is not very important because it does not indicate how information security addresses or mitigates the threats or risks. A report of a successful attack on a competitor is not very important because it does not indicate how information security prevents or responds to such attacks. An identification of organizational risks is not very important because it does not indicate how information security manages or reduces the risks. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

= The most important consideration when establishing an organization’s information security governance committee is to ensure that members represent functions across the organization. This is because the information security governance committee is responsible for setting the direction, scope, and objectives of the information security program, and for ensuring that the program aligns with the organization’s business goals and strategies. By having members from different functions, such as finance, human resources, operations, legal, and IT, the committee can ensure that the information security program considers the needs, expectations, and perspectives of various stakeholders, and that the program supports the organization’s mission, vision, and values. Having a diverse and representative committee also helps to foster a culture of security awareness and accountability throughout the organization, and to promote collaboration and communication among different functions.

Members having knowledge of information security controls, members being business risk owners, and members being rotated periodically are all desirable characteristics of an information security governance committee, but they are not the most important consideration. Members having knowledge of information security controls can help the committee to understand the technical aspects of information security and to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security program. However, having technical knowledge is not sufficient to ensure that the information security program is aligned with the organization’s business goals and strategies, and that the program considers the needs and expectations of various stakeholders. Members being business risk owners can help the committee to identify and prioritize the information security risks that affect the organization’s business objectives, and to allocate appropriate resources and responsibilities for managing those risks. However, being a business risk owner does not necessarily imply that the member has a comprehensive and balanced view of the organization’s information security needs and expectations, and that the member can represent the interests and perspectives of various functions. Members being rotated periodically can help the committee to maintain its independence and objectivity, and to avoid conflicts of interest or complacency. However, rotating members too frequently can also reduce the continuity and consistency of the information security program, and can affect the committee’s ability to monitor and evaluate the performance and progress of the information security program. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 36-37.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1014.

Regulatory compliance is the most important objective when implementing a security policy for an organization handling personally identifiable information (PII) because it helps to ensure that the organization meets the legal and ethical obligations to protect the privacy and security of PII. PII is any information that can be used to identify, contact, or locate an individual, such as name, address, email, phone number, social security number, etc. PII is subject to various laws and regulations in different jurisdictions, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States, or the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) in Canada. Failing to comply with these regulations can result in fines, lawsuits, reputational damage, or loss of trust. Therefore, regulatory compliance is the correct answer.

Potential business loss is the most important factor to consider when determining asset valuation, as it reflects the impact of losing or compromising the asset on the organization’s objectives and operations. Asset recovery cost, asset classification level, and cost of insurance premiums are also relevant, but not as important as potential business loss, as they do not capture the full value of the asset to the organization. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 461; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 292

Mitigate is the risk treatment option that has been applied by implementing a firewall in front of the legacy application because it helps to reduce the impact or probability of a risk. Mitigate is a process of taking actions to lessen the negative effects of a risk, such as implementing security controls, policies, or procedures. A firewall is a security device that monitors and filters the network traffic between the legacy application and the external network, blocking or allowing packets based on predefined rules. A firewall helps to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, exploitation, or attack on the legacy application that cannot be patched. Therefore, mitigate is the correct answer.

The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) defines the maximum acceptable downtime for a business function or system following a disruption. If the organization requires recovery in 30 minutes, that is the system’s RTO.

This metric guides the selection of technologies, staffing, and procedures needed to meet recovery expectations.

“RTO defines the target time set for the recovery of IT and business activities after a disruption. It is a key BCP design parameter.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning*

 Establishing an information security steering committee is the best way to facilitate the integration of information security governance into enterprise governance. The information security steering committee is a cross-functional group of senior managers who provide strategic direction, oversight, and support for the information security program. The committee ensures that the information security strategy is aligned with the enterprise strategy, objectives, and risk appetite. The committee also fosters collaboration and communication among various stakeholders and promotes a culture of security awareness and accountability. Developing an information security policy, documenting the information security governance framework, and implementing an information security awareness program are all important activities for implementing and maintaining information security governance, but they do not necessarily facilitate its integration into enterprise governance. These activities may be initiated or endorsed by the information security steering committee, but they are not sufficient to ensure that information security governance is embedded into the enterprise governance structure and processes. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 34 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

 = Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining the policies, standards, frameworks, and best practices that guide the information security program of an organization. Information security governance helps to ensure that the information security program meets the needs of the business by aligning it with the organization’s risk appetite, objectives, and strategy. Information security governance also helps to coordinate and integrate various assurance functions, such as risk management, compliance, audit, and incident response, to provide a holistic view of the information security posture. Information security governance is essential for achieving a positive return on investment (ROI) from information security investments, as well as for enhancing the trust and confidence of internal and external stakeholders. References = CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 1: Introduction to Information Security Management, Section 1.1: Overview of Information Security Management1. CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 1: Introduction to Information Security Management, Section 1.1: Overview of Information Security Management2. CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, Domain 1: Information Security Governance, Task Statement 1.1, p. 193.

Information security governance is MOST important to have in place to help ensure an organization’s cybersecurity program meets the needs of the business. This is because information security governance provides the strategic direction, oversight and accountability for the cybersecurity program. It also ensures that the program aligns with the business objectives, risk appetite and compliance requirements of the organization. Information security governance involves defining roles and responsibilities, establishing policies and standards, setting goals and metrics, allocating resources and monitoring performance of the cybersecurity program.

The data owner is the most appropriate role to determine access rights for specific users of an application because they have legal rights and complete control over data elements4. They are also responsible for approving data glossaries and definitions, ensuring the accuracy of information, and supervising operations related to data quality5. The data custodian is responsible for the safe custody, transport, and storage of the data and implementation of business rules, but not for determining access rights4. The system administrator is responsible for managing the security and storage infrastructure of data sets according to the organization’s data governance policies, but not for determining access rights5. Senior management is responsible for setting the strategic direction and priorities for data governance, but not for determining access rights5. References: 5 https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/data-owners-vs-data-stewards-vs-data-custodians-the-3-types-of-data-masters-and-why-you-should-employ-them/ 4 https://cloudgal42.com/data-privacy-difference-between-data-owner-controller-and-data-custodian-processor/

= The best approach for developing a physical access control policy for the organization is to conduct a risk assessment to determine the security risks and mitigating controls that are relevant and appropriate for the organization’s data center. A risk assessment is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that could affect the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the servers, applications, and data that are hosted in the data center. A risk assessment can help to determine the likelihood and impact of the unauthorized or inappropriate physical access to the data center, such as theft, damage, sabotage, or espionage, and the potential consequences for the organization and its customers, such as service disruption, data loss, data breach, or legal liability. A risk assessment can also help to identify and prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options, such as implementing technical, administrative, or physical controls to prevent, detect, or respond to the physical access incidents, such as locks, alarms, cameras, guards, badges, or logs. A risk assessment can also help to communicate and report the risk level and status to the senior management and the relevant stakeholders, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the physical access control policy and the risk management process.

Reviewing customers’ security policies, developing access control requirements for each system and application, and designing single sign-on (SSO) or federated access are all possible steps that the organization can take after conducting the risk assessment, but they are not the best ones. Reviewing customers’ security policies is a process of understanding and complying with the customers’ expectations and requirements for the security of their servers, applications, and data that are hosted in the data center, and ensuring that the organization’s physical access control policy is consistent and compatible with them. Developing access control requirements for each system and application is a process of defining and implementing the specific rules and criteria for granting or denying the physical access to the servers and applications that are hosted in the data center, based on the roles, responsibilities, and privileges of the users, and the sensitivity and criticality of the systems and applications. Designing single sign-on (SSO) or federated access is a process of enabling and facilitating the authentication and authorization of the users who need to access the servers and applications that are hosted in the data center, by using a single or shared identity and credential across multiple systems and domains. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 51-531; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1542

The information security manager should first determine the risk related to noncompliance with the policy, as this will help to understand the impact and likelihood of the policy violation and the potential consequences for the organization. The information security manager can then use the risk assessment results to communicate the importance of the policy to the IT personnel, propose any necessary changes to the policy or the processes, or request an audit of the policy development process, depending on the situation. Conducting user awareness training, updating policies and procedures, or requesting an audit are possible actions that the information security manager can take after determining the risk, but they are not the first step. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 86; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 59, page 60.

A centralized incident response team ensures consistent communication, coordination, and a unified approach to managing incidents across the organization.

“A centralized incident response team provides a consistent and coordinated approach to incident handling and ensures that management is kept informed.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Incident Management, Section: Incident Response Organization Models*

The first consideration when deciding to move to a cloud-based model should be data classification, because it helps the organization to identify the sensitivity, value, and criticality of the data that will be stored, processed, or transmitted in the cloud. Data classification can help the organization to determine the appropriate level of protection, encryption, and access control for the data, and to comply with the relevant legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements. Data classification can also help the organization to evaluate the suitability, compatibility, and trustworthiness of the cloud service provider and the cloud service model, and to negotiate the terms and conditions of the cloud service contract.

Storage in a shared environment, availability of the data, and physical location of the data are all important considerations when deciding to move to a cloud-based model, but they are not the first consideration. Storage in a shared environment can affect the security, privacy, and integrity of the data, as the data may be co-located with other customers’ data, and may be subject to unauthorized access, modification, or deletion. Availability of the data can affect the reliability, performance, and continuity of the data, as the data may be inaccessible, corrupted, or lost due to network failures, service outages, or disasters. Physical location of the data can affect the compliance, sovereignty, and jurisdiction of the data, as the data may be stored or transferred across different countries or regions, and may be subject to different laws, regulations, or policies. However, these considerations depend on the data classification, as different types of data may have different levels of risk, impact, and expectation in the cloud environment. References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 95-96, 99-100, 103-104, 107-108.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1031.

 Information asset classification is the process of identifying, labeling, and categorizing information assets based on their value, sensitivity, and criticality to the organization. Information asset classification helps to establish appropriate security controls, policies, and procedures for protecting the information assets from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction. One of the key elements of information asset classification is assigning owners to each information asset. Owners are responsible for managing the information asset throughout its lifecycle, including defining its security requirements, implementing security controls, monitoring its usage and performance, reporting any incidents or breaches, and ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory obligations. Therefore, assigning responsibility to the database administrator (DBA) is the best way to address the situation where several production databases do not have owners assigned to them. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition1, page 256; Information Asset and Security Classification Procedure2.

The effectiveness of an information security governance framework will best be enhanced if risk management is built into operational and strategic activities. This is because risk management is a key component of information security governance, which is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with and support business objectives, are consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and are effectively managed and measured. Risk management involves identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and communicating information security risks that may affect the organization’s objectives, assets, and stakeholders. By integrating risk management into operational and strategic activities, the organization can ensure that information security risks are considered and addressed in every decision and action, and that the information security governance framework is aligned with the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance. This also helps to optimize the allocation of resources, enhance the performance and value of information security, and improve the accountability and transparency of information security governance.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Governance Framework, page 181; CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Management, page 812; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 53, page 493.

The best way to obtain organizational support for the implementation of security controls is to establish effective stakeholder relationships. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups that have an interest or influence in the organization’s information security objectives, activities, and outcomes. They may include senior management, business owners, users, customers, regulators, auditors, vendors, and others. By establishing effective stakeholder relationships, the information security manager can communicate the value and benefits of security controls to the organization’s performance, reputation, and competitiveness. The information security manager can also solicit feedback and input from stakeholders to ensure that the security controls are aligned with the organization’s needs and expectations. The information security manager can also foster collaboration and cooperation among stakeholders to facilitate the implementation and operation of security controls. The other options are not the best way to obtain organizational support for the implementation of security controls, although they may be some steps or outcomes of the process. Conducting periodic vulnerability assessments is a technical activity that can help identify and prioritize the security weaknesses and gaps in the organization’s information assets and systems. However, it does not necessarily obtain organizational support for the implementation of security controls unless the results are communicated and justified to the stakeholders. Communicating business impact analysis (BIA) results is a reporting activity that can help demonstrate the potential consequences of disruptions or incidents on the organization’s critical business processes and functions. However, it does not necessarily obtain organizational support for the implementation of security controls unless the results are linked to the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance. Defining the organization’s risk management framework is a strategic activity that can help establish the policies, procedures, roles, and responsibilities for managing information security risks in a consistent and effective manner. However, it does not necessarily obtain organizational support for the implementation of security controls unless the framework is endorsed and enforced by the stakeholders

A balanced scorecard is a tool that can be used to demonstrate the added value of an information security program by measuring and reporting on key performance indicators (KPIs) and key risk indicators (KRIs) aligned with strategic objectives. Security baselines, a gap analysis and a SWOT analysis are all useful for assessing and improving security posture, but they do not necessarily show how security contributes to business value.

According to the CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2, change management is the process of identifying, assessing, approving, implementing, and monitoring changes to information systems and information security controls1. Change management is essential for ensuring that changes are aligned with the organization’s business strategy and objectives, as well as complying with applicable laws and regulations1.

The CISM Review Manual (Digital Version) also states that change management should be performed in conjunction with other processes, such as configuration management, access control management, and risk management1. Configuration management is the process of identifying, documenting, controlling, and verifying the configuration items (CIs) of an information system1. Access control management is the process of granting or denying access to information systems and information assets based on predefined policies and procedures1. Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and communicating risks to information systems and information assets1.

The CISM Exam Content Outline also covers the topic of change management in Domain 3 — Information Security Program Development and Management (27% exam weight)2. The subtopics include:

3.2.2 Change Management

3.2.3 Change Control

3.2.4 Change Implementation

3.2.5 Change Monitoring

I hope this answer helps you prepare for your CISM exam. Good luck! 😊

A risk owner is a person or entity that is responsible for ensuring that risk is managed effectively. One of the primary responsibilities of a risk owner is to implement controls that will help mitigate or manage the risk. While risk assessments, determining the organization's risk appetite, and monitoring control effectiveness are all important aspects of managing risk, it is the responsibility of the risk owner to take the necessary actions to manage the risk.

The most important issue in a penetration test is having a defined goal as well as success and failure criteria. A penetration test is a simulated cyber attack against a computer system or an application to check for exploitable vulnerabilities. The goal of a penetration test is to identify and evaluate the security risks and weaknesses of the target system or application, and to provide recommendations for improvement. The success and failure criteria of a penetration test are the metrics and indicators that measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the test, and the extent to which the test achieves its goal. By having a defined goal as well as success and failure criteria, the penetration tester can plan and execute the test in a systematic and structured manner, and can communicate and report the results and findings in a clear and concise way. The other options are not the most important issue in a penetration test, although they may be some factors or considerations that affect the test. Having an independent group perform the test is a desirable practice, as it can provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the target system or application. However, it is not essential, as long as the penetration tester follows ethical hacking principles and standards. Obtaining permission from audit is a mandatory requirement, as it ensures that the penetration test is authorized and compliant with the organization’s policies and regulations. However, it is not an issue, as it is a prerequisite for conducting the test. Performing the test without the benefit of any insider knowledge is an optional approach, as it simulates a real-world attack by an external hacker who does not have access to the internal design or configuration of the target system or application. However, it is not always feasible or effective, as some vulnerabilities may be hidden or inaccessible from an outsider’s perspective.

Isolating the impacted endpoints is the best course of action for the information security manager after an employee clicked on a link in a phishing email, triggering a ransomware attack because it prevents the ransomware from spreading to other systems or devices on the network, and minimizes the damage or disruption caused by the attack. Wiping the affected system is not a good course of action because it may destroy any evidence or data that could be used for investigation or recovery. Notifying internal legal counsel is not a good course of action because it does not address the immediate threat or impact of the ransomware attack. Notifying senior management is not a good course of action because it does not address the immediate threat or impact of the ransomware attack. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

The first course of action is to ensure the policy has been communicated to the system administrators (C). CISM governance principles require that policies be formally communicated and understood before enforcement or compliance assessment occurs. Conducting assessments (B) or training (A) is ineffective if administrators are not aware of the policy requirements. Effective governance follows a sequence: approval → communication → implementation → monitoring and enforcement. Communication ensures accountability and supports consistent adoption of security requirements.

Security awareness training is the most effective way to ensure information security policies are understood, as it educates employees on the purpose, content and importance of the policies, and how to comply with them. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

Performing a gap analysis is the first step to ensure the security policy framework encompasses the new business model because it is a process of comparing the current state of security policies and controls with the desired or required state. A gap analysis helps to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the existing security policy framework, as well as the opportunities and threats posed by the new business model. A gap analysis also helps to prioritize the actions and resources needed to close the gaps and align the security policy framework with the new business objectives and requirements. Therefore, performing a gap analysis is the correct answer.

According to the CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition1, information asset classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity to information assets based on their importance to the organization and the potential impact of unauthorized disclosure, modification or destruction. The criticality of an information asset to a business process is one of the key factors that determines its classification level.

References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition, ISACA, 2016, Chapter 2, page 61.

 The role of the information security manager in finalizing contract negotiations with service providers is to ensure that the outsourcing process is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and objectives. One of the key aspects of this process is to perform a risk analysis on the outsourcing process, which involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from outsourcing activities. A risk analysis can help the information security manager to determine the appropriate level of security controls and requirements for the outsourced process, as well as to monitor and evaluate its performance and compliance. A risk analysis can also help to avoid or minimize legal, financial, reputational, or operational risks associated with outsourcing1. References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

CISM Review Manual (Print Version), Chapter 6: Information Security Program Management

Gap analysis is the MOST helpful tool for understanding where to focus efforts when developing an information security strategy for an organization, because it helps to identify the current state and the desired state of the information security governance, and the gaps between them. Gap analysis also helps to prioritize the actions and resources needed to close the gaps and achieve the information security objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 36: “Gap analysis is the process of comparing the current state and the desired state of information security governance and identifying the gaps that need to be addressed.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 37: “Gap analysis should be performed periodically to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security strategy and program and to identify the areas for improvement.”

CISM domain 1: Information security governance [Updated 2022] - Infosec Resources: “Gap analysis: This is a comparison of the current state of security with the desired state. It helps to identify the gaps in security and prioritize the actions required to close them.”

Before drafting or enforcing policies, the first step is to evaluate the risks posed by employee use of social media. This may include data leakage, reputational damage, phishing, and legal liability.

Once risks are identified and understood in the organization’s context, policies can be developed that specifically address those risks. Acting prematurely without a risk assessment can lead to overly restrictive or insufficient policies.

“Security policies should be risk-driven. Understanding potential threats and impacts is the foundation for effective policy creation.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Risk-Based Policy Development*

 An information security manager should first discuss the issue with senior leadership to escalate the problem and seek their support and guidance. Bypassing the change management process can introduce significant risks to the organization, such as unauthorized access, data loss, system instability, or compliance violations. The information security manager should explain the potential impact and consequences of the incident, and recommend corrective actions to remediate the situation. The information security manager should also review the root cause of the incident and identify any gaps or weaknesses in the existing policies, procedures, or controls that allowed the business unit to implement the new application without proper authorization, testing, or documentation. The information security manager should then revise the procurement process, update the change management process, or implement other measures to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Removing the application from production may not be feasible or desirable, depending on the business needs and the severity of the risks involved. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 100-1011; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 2692

Learn more:

1. isaca.org2. amazon.com3. gov.uk

The risk owner is the best positioned to be accountable for risk acceptance decisions based on risk appetite, because the risk owner is the person or entity with the accountability and authority to manage a risk1. The risk owner is responsible for evaluating the risk level, comparing it with the risk appetite, and deciding whether to accept, avoid, transfer, or mitigate the risk2. The risk owner is also accountable for monitoring and reporting on the risk status and outcomes3. The information security manager, the chief risk officer (CRO), and the information security steering committee may have some roles and responsibilities in the risk management process, but they are not the primary accountable parties for risk acceptance decisions.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 754; Risk Acceptance

During post-incident review is the best time to update the incident response plan after observing several deficiencies in the current plan while responding to a high-profile security incident. A post-incident review is a process of analyzing and evaluating the incident response activities, identifying the lessons learned, and documenting the recommendations and action items for improvement. Updating the incident response plan during post-incident review helps to ensure that the plan reflects the current best practices, addresses the gaps and weaknesses, and incorporates the feedback and suggestions from the incident response team and other stakeholders. Therefore, during post-incident review is the correct answer.

Elapsed time between detection, reporting, and response is the most appropriate metric for evaluating the incident notification process because it measures how quickly and effectively the organization identifies, communicates, and responds to security incidents. The incident notification process is a critical part of the incident response plan that defines the roles and responsibilities, procedures, and channels for reporting and escalating security incidents to the relevant stakeholders. Elapsed time between detection, reporting, and response helps to assess the performance and efficiency of the incident notification process, as well as to identify any bottlenecks or delays that may affect the incident resolution and recovery. Therefore, elapsed time between detection, reporting, and response is the correct answer.

According to the CISM Manual, the organization’s risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that the organization is willing to accept in order to achieve its objectives1. The organization’s risk appetite should guide the development and maintenance of an information security program, as it determines the level of security controls, resources, and activities that are needed to protect the organization’s assets and operations1.

The CISM Manual states that “the information security program should be aligned with the organization’s risk appetite, which reflects its tolerance for risk and its strategic objectives” (IR 8288A)1. The information security program should also consider other factors that influence the organization’s risk appetite, such as its mission, vision, values, culture, stakeholders, regulations, standards, guidelines, and best practices1.

The CISM Manual also provides guidance on how to develop and maintain an information security program based on the organization’s risk appetite. It recommends using a process that involves identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and reviewing risks that affect the organization’s information assets1. It also suggests using a framework or model that supports the development of an information security program based on the organization’s risk appetite (e.g., ISO/IEC 27001)1.

The control owner is the individual accountable for implementing and managing specific controls that mitigate risks. While the risk owner is responsible for the overall risk and decision-making, it is the control owner who ensures the selected mitigation is effectively implemented and maintained.

“The control owner is responsible for ensuring that the control is properly designed, implemented, and operating effectively.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment

ISACA practice questions stress this distinction: the control owner is tasked with the execution of mitigation strategies.

 An information security post-incident review is a process that aims to identify the root causes, impacts, lessons learned, and improvement actions of a security incident. The highest priority during a post-incident review should be evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response, which means assessing how well the incident response plan, procedures, roles, resources, and communication were executed and aligned with the business objectives and requirements. Evaluating the incident response effectiveness can help to identify the gaps, weaknesses, strengths, and opportunities for improvement in the incident response process and capabilities. Documenting actions taken in sufficient detail, updating key risk indicators (KRIs), and evaluating the performance of incident response team members are also important activities during a post-incident review, but they are not as critical as evaluating the incident response effectiveness, which can provide a holistic and strategic view of the incident response maturity and value.

References =

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, page 2411

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, 2020, question ID 2192

During post-incident reviews, the highest priority should be given to evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response effort. This includes assessing the accuracy of the response to the incident, the timeliness of the response, and the efficiency of the response. It is important to assess the effectiveness of the response in order to identify areas for improvement and ensure that future responses can be more effective. Documenting the actions taken in sufficient detail, updating key risk indicators (KRIs), and evaluating the performance of incident response team members are all important components of a post-incident review, but evaluating incident response effectiveness should be given the highest priority.

The effective execution of an incident response plan depends largely on the competence and readiness of the response team, who are responsible for carrying out the tasks and activities defined in the plan. Therefore, the best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan is to ensure that the response team is trained on the plan, and that they are familiar with their roles, responsibilities, procedures, and tools. Training the response team on the plan will also help to improve their confidence, communication, coordination, and collaboration during an incident response. The other options are not the best ways to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan, although they may be important factors for developing or improving the plan. The plan should be based on risk assessment results and industry best practice, but these do not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively. The incident response plan should align with the IT disaster recovery plan, but this does not ensure that the response team is prepared and capable of executing the plan. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1031

The best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan is to ensure that the response team is trained on the plan. An incident response plan is a set of instructions that defines the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and tools for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security incidents. An incident response team is a group of individuals that are assigned to perform specific tasks and activities during an incident response process. The response team may include security analysts, IT staff, legal counsel, public relations, and other stakeholders. To execute an incident response plan effectively, the response team needs to be trained on the plan, which means they need to be familiar with the following aspects of the plan: The scope and objectives of the plan The roles and responsibilities of each team member The communication and escalation protocols The incident classification and prioritization criteria The incident response procedures and tools The incident documentation and reporting requirements The incident review and improvement processes By training the response team on the plan, the organization can ensure that the team members are prepared and confident to handle any security incidents that may occur, and that they can perform their tasks efficiently and consistently. The other options are not the best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan, although they may be some steps or outcomes of the process. The plan being based on risk assessment results is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plan is aligned with the organization’s risk profile and addresses the most relevant and likely threats and vulnerabilities. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan. The plan being based on industry best practice is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plan follows established standards and guidelines for incident response. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan. The incident response plan aligning with the IT disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plans are consistent and coordinated in terms of objectives, scope, roles, procedures, and tools. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan

= Continuous monitoring is the process of collecting, analyzing, and reporting on the security status of an organization’s information systems and networks. Continuous monitoring enables an organization to identify and contain security incidents by providing timely and accurate information on the security events, alerts, incidents, and threats that may affect the organization. Continuous monitoring also helps to measure the effectiveness and compliance of the security controls, policies, and procedures that are implemented to protect the organization’s information assets. Continuous monitoring can be performed using various tools and methods, such as security information and event management (SIEM) tools, intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDS/IPS), vulnerability scanners, log analyzers, and audit trails.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 6: Incident Response Planning (IRP), Section 6.2: Continuous Monitoring2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: 3

= To confirm that a third-party provider complies with an organization’s information security requirements, it is most important to ensure that the right to audit is included in the service level agreement (SLA), which is a contract that defines the scope, quality, and terms of the services that the third-party provider delivers to the organization. The right to audit is a clause that grants the organization the authority and opportunity to inspect and verify the third-party provider’s security policies, procedures, controls, and performance, either by itself or by an independent auditor, at any time during the contract period or after a security incident. The right to audit can help to ensure that the third-party provider adheres to the organization’s information security requirements, as well as to the legal and regulatory standards and obligations, and that the organization can monitor and measure the security risks and issues that arise from the outsourcing relationship. The right to audit can also help to identify and address any gaps, weaknesses, or errors that could compromise the security of the information assets and systems that are shared, stored, or processed by the third-party provider, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the security posture and performance.

Security metrics, contract clauses, and the information security policy of the third-party provider are all important elements of ensuring the compliance of the third-party provider with the organization’s information security requirements, but they are not the most important ones. Security metrics are quantitative and qualitative measures that indicate the effectiveness and efficiency of the security controls and processes that the third-party provider implements and reports to the organization, such as the number of security incidents, the time to resolve them, the level of customer satisfaction, or the compliance rate. Security metrics can help to evaluate and compare the security performance and outcomes of the third-party provider, as well as to identify and address any deviations or discrepancies from the expected or agreed levels. Contract clauses are legal and contractual terms and conditions that bind the third-party provider to the organization’s information security requirements, such as the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information assets and systems, the roles and responsibilities of the parties, the liabilities and penalties for breach or violation, or the dispute resolution mechanisms. Contract clauses can help to enforce and protect the organization’s information security interests and rights, as well as to prevent or resolve any conflicts or issues that arise from the outsourcing relationship. The information security policy of the third-party provider is a document that defines and communicates the third-party provider’s security vision, mission, objectives, and principles, as well as the security roles, responsibilities, and rules that apply to the third-party provider’s staff, customers, and partners. The information security policy of the third-party provider can help to ensure that the third-party provider has a clear and consistent security direction and guidance, as well as to align and integrate the third-party provider’s security practices and culture with the organization’s security expectations and requirements. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 57-581; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1662

A business impact analysis (BIA) (B) best determines application resilience requirements because it identifies criticality, maximum tolerable downtime, recovery time objectives (RTOs), and recovery point objectives (RPOs) based on business impact. Resilience is fundamentally about the organization’s ability to continue or rapidly restore critical business functions. Risk assessments (A) and threat assessments (D) identify risks and threat sources but do not define acceptable downtime or recovery priorities. Cost-benefit analysis (C) helps evaluate investment decisions but is secondary to understanding business impact. CISM clearly positions the BIA as the foundation for continuity, resilience, and recovery planning decisions, ensuring security and availability controls align with business priorities.

= Reevaluation of risk is a vital aspect of the risk management process that helps organizations to identify and analyze new or evolving threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on their assets, and implement the necessary controls to mitigate them. Reevaluation of risk is most critical when there is a change in the threat landscape, which refers to the external and internal factors that influence the likelihood and severity of potential attacks on the organization’s information assets. A change in the threat landscape may be caused by various factors, such as technological innovations, geopolitical events, cybercrime trends, regulatory changes, or organizational changes. A change in the threat landscape may introduce new risks or alter the existing risk profile of the organization, requiring a reassessment of the risk appetite, tolerance, and strategy. Reevaluation of risk helps the organization to adapt to the changing threat landscape and ensure that the information security program remains effective, efficient, and aligned with the business objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1131

CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update]2

Reevaluation of Risk | CISM Exam Question Answer | ISACA3

According to the NIST SP 800-61 Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, the first step in responding to a cybersecurity incident is to invoke the incident response plan (IRP), which is a written document that defines the roles, responsibilities, and procedures for dealing with a confirmed or suspected security breach1. The IRP helps the organization to prepare for, detect, analyze, contain, eradicate, recover from, and learn from incidents1. Invoking the IRP ensures that the right personnel and resources are mobilized to effectively deal with the threat and minimize the impact.

References = 1: NIST SP 800-61: 1. Introduction1

Inconsistent device security is the primary challenge for an information security manager when deploying a bring your own device (BYOD) mobile program in an enterprise because it increases the risk of data breaches and compromises. A BYOD mobile program allows employees to use their personal devices, such as smartphones, tablets, or laptops, to access the organization’s network, applications, and data. However, personal devices may have different operating systems, versions, configurations, and security settings than the organization’s standard devices. Moreover, personal devices may not be updated regularly, may have unauthorized or malicious apps installed, or may not have adequate protection against malware or theft. Inconsistent device security makes it difficult for the information security manager to enforce and monitor the security policies and controls across all devices, as well as to ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements for data privacy and security. Therefore, inconsistent device security is the correct answer.

 To support effective risk decision making, it is most important to have risk reporting procedures in place. Risk reporting procedures define how, when, and to whom risk information is communicated within the organization. Risk reporting procedures ensure that risk information is timely, accurate, consistent, and relevant for the decision makers. Risk reporting procedures also facilitate the monitoring and review of risk management activities and outcomes. Risk reporting procedures enable the organization to align its risk appetite and tolerance with its business objectives and strategies. Established risk domains are not the most important factor for effective risk decision making. Risk domains are categories or areas of risk that reflect the organization’s structure, objectives, and operations. Risk domains help to organize and prioritize risk information, but they do not necessarily support the communication and analysis of risk information for decision making. An audit committee consisting of mid-level management is not the most important factor for effective risk decision making. An audit committee is a subcommittee of the board of directors that oversees the internal and external audit functions of the organization. An audit committee should consist of independent and qualified members, preferably from the board of directors or senior management, not mid-level management. An audit committee provides assurance and oversight on the effectiveness of risk management, but it does not directly support risk decision making. Well-defined and approved controls are not the most important factor for effective risk decision making. Controls are measures or actions that reduce the likelihood or impact of risk events. Well-defined and approved controls are essential for implementing risk responses and mitigating risks, but they do not directly support the identification, analysis, and evaluation of risks for decision making. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 207-208.

Established risk domains are important for effective risk decision making because they provide a basis for categorizing risks and assessing their impact on the organization. Risk domains are also used to assign risk ownership and prioritize risk management activities. Having established risk domains in place helps ensure that risks are properly identified and addressed, and enables organizations to make informed and effective decisions about risk. Risk reporting procedures, an audit committee consisting of mid-level management, and well-defined and approved controls are all important components of an effective risk management program, but established risk domains are the most important for effective risk decision making.

According to the Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) Study Manual, risk owners are responsible for managing a risk, including taking corrective action to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. When implementing controls, it is essential to obtain input from risk owners to ensure that the controls are effective in managing the risk to an acceptable level.

By obtaining input from risk owners, the organization can ensure that the controls are tailored to the specific risks and are effective in reducing the risk to an acceptable level. This can help to minimize the impact of the risk on the organization and reduce the potential for financial or reputational damage.

Performing frequent backups and storing them offline is the best way to reduce the impact of a successful ransomware attack, as this allows the organization to restore its data and systems without paying the ransom or losing valuable information. Purchasing or renewing cyber insurance policies may help cover some of the costs and losses associated with a ransomware attack, but it does not prevent or mitigate the attack itself. Including provisions to pay ransoms in the information security budget may encourage more attacks and does not guarantee the recovery of the data or the removal of the malware. Monitoring the network and providing alerts on intrusions may help detect and respond to a ransomware attack, but it does not reduce the impact of a successful attack that has already encrypted or exfiltrated the data. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1661; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 312; CISM Exam Overview - Vinsys3

The best way to support effective communication during information security incidents is to have predetermined service level agreements (SLAs) because they define the expectations and responsibilities of the parties involved in the incident response process, and specify the communication channels, methods, and frequency for reporting and updating on the incident status and resolution. Frequent incident response training sessions are not very effective because they do not address the communication needs or challenges during an actual incident. Centralized control monitoring capabilities are not very effective because they do not address the communication needs or challenges during an actual incident. Responsibilities defined within role descriptions are not very effective because they do not address the communication needs or challenges during an actual incident. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-5/incident-response-lessons-learned https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/incident-response-lessons-learned

 The most important reason to conduct interviews as part of the business impact analysis (BIA) process is to obtain input from as many relevant stakeholders as possible. A BIA is a process of identifying and analyzing the potential effects of disruptive events on the organization’s critical business functions, processes, and resources. A BIA helps to determine the recovery priorities, objectives, and strategies for the organization’s continuity planning. Interviews are one of the methods to collect data and information for the BIA, and they involve direct and interactive communication with the stakeholders who are involved in or affected by the business functions, processes, and resources. By conducting interviews, the information security manager can obtain input from as many relevant stakeholders as possible, such as business owners, managers, users, customers, suppliers, regulators, and partners. This can help to ensure that the BIA covers the full scope and complexity of the organization’s business activities, and that the BIA reflects the accurate, current, and comprehensive views and expectations of the stakeholders. Interviews can also help to validate, clarify, and supplement the data and information obtained from other sources, such as surveys, questionnaires, documents, or systems. Interviews can also help to build rapport, trust, and collaboration among the stakeholders, and to increase their awareness, involvement, and commitment to the information security and continuity planning.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Business Impact Analysis (BIA), pages 178-1801; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 65, page 602.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation = The risk owner is the person or entity with the accountability and authority to manage a risk. The risk owner should have the decision-making authority and the ability to allocate resources for risk treatment and related control activities. The risk owner should also be responsible for monitoring and reporting on the risk, but these are not the most important considerations when assigning a risk owner. The risk owner may not have adequate knowledge of risk treatment and related control activities, but can delegate or consult with experts as needed. The risk owner should also have sufficient time for managing the risk effectively, but this is not a prerequisite for assigning a risk owner.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 76

CISM Practice Quiz, question 4171

 The information security manager should first evaluate the information security laws that apply to the acquired company, as they may differ from the laws of the parent organization. This will help the information security manager to understand the legal and regulatory requirements, risks, and challenges that the acquired company faces in its operating environment. The information security manager can then determine the best approach to align the information security programs of the two entities, taking into account the different laws and regulations, as well as the business objectives and strategies of the acquisition. References = : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 32.

The supportive tone at the top regarding security is the greatest impact on efforts to improve an organization’s security posture. This means that senior management should demonstrate their commitment and leadership to information security by setting clear goals, allocating adequate resources, communicating effectively, and rewarding good practices. A supportive tone at the top can also influence the culture and behavior of the organization, as well as foster trust and collaboration among stakeholders12. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1261; CISM Item Development Guide, page 82

 According to the CISM Review Manual, the first step to establishing an effective information security program is to create a business case that aligns the program objectives with the organization’s goals and strategies. A business case provides the rationale and justification for the information security program and helps to secure the necessary resources and support from senior management and other stakeholders. A business case should include the following elements:

The scope and objectives of the information security program

The current state of information security in the organization and the gap analysis

The benefits and value proposition of the information security program

The risks and challenges of the information security program

The estimated costs and resources of the information security program

The expected outcomes and performance indicators of the information security program

The implementation plan and timeline of the information security program

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 2, pages 97-99.

A security metrics dashboard is a graphical representation of key performance indicators (KPIs) and key risk indicators (KRIs) that provide useful information about the effectiveness of the information security program. A security metrics dashboard can help communicate the value and performance of the information security program to senior management and other stakeholders, as well as identify areas for improvement and alignment with business objectives. A security metrics dashboard should be concise, relevant, timely, accurate, and actionable.

References = CISM Review Manual 16th Edition, page 163; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, page 419.

Laws and regulations provide the most useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because they define the legal and compliance requirements and obligations that the organization must adhere to, and guide the development and implementation of the security policies and controls that support them. Security budget is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security needs or goals, but rather a resource to enable the security activities and initiatives. Risk register is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security vision or mission, but rather a tool to identify and manage the security risks. Risk score is not a useful input to determine the organization’s information security strategy because it does not reflect the organization’s security priorities or objectives, but rather a measure of the level of risk exposure or performance. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

The greatest benefit of incorporating information security governance into the corporate governance framework is D. Management accountability for information security. This is because management accountability for information security means that the senior management and the board of directors are responsible for defining, overseeing, and supporting the information security strategy, policies, and objectives of the organization, and ensuring that they are aligned with the business goals, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory requirements. Management accountability for information security also means that the senior management and the board of directors are accountable for the performance, value, and effectiveness of the information security program, and for the management and mitigation of the information security risks and incidents. Management accountability for information security can help to foster a culture of security awareness and responsibility, and to enhance the trust and confidence of the customers, partners, and regulators in the organization’s information security capabilities.

Management accountability for information security means that the senior management and the board of directors are responsible for defining, overseeing, and supporting the information security strategy, policies, and objectives of the organization, and ensuring that they are aligned with the business goals, stakeholder expectations, and regulatory requirements. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.1, page 181; CISM domain 1: Information security governance [Updated 2022] | Infosec2; Information Security Governance: Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd Edition3

Change control is the process of ensuring that changes to an information system are authorized, tested, documented and implemented in a controlled manner. Inadequate change control can result in deficient technical security controls, such as missing patches, misconfigurations, vulnerabilities or errors in the new application.

References = CISM Review Manual, 27th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2, page 2291

The next thing an incident response team should do after establishing that an application has been breached is to isolate the impacted systems from the rest of the network, which means disconnecting them from the internet or other network connections to prevent further spread of the attack or data exfiltration. Isolating the impacted systems can help to contain the breach and limit its impact on the organization. The other options, such as maintaining the affected systems in a forensically acceptable state, conducting a risk assessment, or informing senior management, may be done later in the incident response process, after isolating the impacted systems. References:

https://www.crowdstrike.com/cybersecurity-101/incident-response/

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/operations/incident-response-playbooks

https://www.invicti.com/blog/web-security/incident-response-steps-web-application-security/

The primary role of the information security program is to provide guidance in managing organizational security risk (B). In CISM, the security program translates governance direction, policies, and risk appetite into coordinated activities, controls, and practices that enable the organization to manage risk consistently and effectively. Performing risk assessments and BIAs (A) are important activities but are not the program’s primary purpose. Approving security requirements (C) is typically a management or governance responsibility, while education and awareness (D) are supporting components of the program. CISM emphasizes that the security program acts as the mechanism for operationalizing risk management, ensuring alignment with business objectives and continuous improvement of the security posture.

 The best way to ensure information security governance is aligned with corporate governance is to integrate security reporting into corporate reporting. This will enable the board and senior management to oversee and monitor the performance and effectiveness of the information security program, as well as the alignment of information security objectives and strategies with business goals and risk appetite. Security reporting should provide relevant, timely, accurate, and actionable information to support decision making and accountability. The other options are important components of information security governance, but they do not ensure alignment with corporate governance by themselves. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 411; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1027

 Risk acceptance is the decision to accept the level of residual risk after applying security controls, and to tolerate the potential impact and consequences of a security incident. Approval of risk acceptance should be provided by business senior management, as they are the owners and accountable parties of the business processes, activities, and assets that are exposed to the risk. Business senior management should also have the authority and responsibility to allocate the resources, personnel, and budget to implement and monitor the risk acceptance decision, and to report and escalate the risk acceptance status to the board of directors or the executive management.

The chief risk officer (CRO) (A) is a senior executive who oversees the organization’s risk management function, and provides guidance, direction, and support for the identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of risks across the organization. The CRO may be involved in the risk acceptance process, such as by reviewing, endorsing, or advising the risk acceptance decision, but the CRO is not the ultimate approver of risk acceptance, as the CRO is not the owner or accountable party of the business processes, activities, and assets that are exposed to the risk.

The information security manager © is the manager who leads and coordinates the information security function, and provides guidance, direction, and support for the development, implementation, and maintenance of the information security program and activities. The information security manager may be involved in the risk acceptance process, such as by conducting the risk assessment, recommending the risk treatment options, or documenting the risk acceptance decision, but the information security manager is not the ultimate approver of risk acceptance, as the information security manager is not the owner or accountable party of the business processes, activities, and assets that are exposed to the risk.

The compliance officer (D) is the officer who oversees the organization’s compliance function, and provides guidance, direction, and support for the identification, assessment, implementation, and monitoring of the compliance requirements and obligations across the organization. The compliance officer may be involved in the risk acceptance process, such as by verifying, validating, or advising the risk acceptance decision, but the compliance officer is not the ultimate approver of risk acceptance, as the compliance officer is not the owner or accountable party of the business processes, activities, and assets that are exposed to the risk.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment, Subsection: Risk Acceptance, page 95-961

A digital signature validates the authenticity and integrity of a message or document. It ensures that the data was not tampered with and originated from a verified sender.

“Digital signatures provide non-repudiation and confirm both the identity of the sender and the data integrity during transmission.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Program Development, Section: Cryptographic Controls*

 The FIRST step in developing an information security strategy is to perform a gap analysis based on the current state of the organization’s information security posture. A gap analysis is a systematic process of comparing the current state with the desired state and identifying the gaps or deficiencies that need to be addressed. A gap analysis helps to establish a baseline for the information security strategy, as well as to prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve the strategic objectives. A gap analysis also helps to align the information security strategy with the organizational goals and strategies, as well as to ensure compliance with relevant standards and regulations. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 331; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 162

first step in developing an information security strategy is to conduct a risk-aware and comprehensive inventory of your company’s context, including all digital assets, employees, and vendors. Then you need to know about the threat environment and which types of attacks are a threat to your company1. This is similar to performing a gap analysis based on the current state3.

The most effective course of action when employees are using free cloud storage services to store company data through their mobile devices is to assess the business need to provide a secure solution, such as a corporate-approved cloud service or a virtual desktop environment. Assessing the business need can help understand why employees are using free cloud storage services, what kind of data they are storing, and what are the security risks and requirements. Based on the assessment, the security manager can propose a secure solution that meets the business needs and complies with the BYOD policy. The other options, such as allowing the practice to continue, disabling remote access, or initiating remote wipe, may not address the underlying business need or may cause disruption or data loss. References:

https://www.digitalguardian.com/blog/byod-security-expert-tips-policy-mitigating-risks-preventing-breach

https://news.microsoft.com/en-xm/2021/03/18/how-to-have-secure-remote-working-with-a-byod-policy/

https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/-infosec-guide-bring-your-own-device-byod

 According to the CISM Review Manual, one of the best ways to contain an SQL injection attack that has been detected by a web application firewall is to reconfigure the web application firewall to block the attack. This means that the web application firewall should be updated with the latest detection patterns and rules that can identify and prevent SQL injection attacks. By doing so, the web application firewall can reduce the impact and damage of the attack, and prevent further exploitation of the vulnerable database1

The other options are not as effective as reconfiguring the web application firewall to block the attack. Force password changes on the SQL database is a reactive measure that does not address the root cause of the problem, and may cause data loss or corruption if not done properly. Updating the detection patterns on the web application firewall is a preventive measure that can help to detect SQL injection attacks, but it does not stop them from happening in the first place. Blocking IPs from where the attack originates is a defensive measure that can limit or stop some SQL injection attacks, but it does not protect all possible sources of malicious traffic, and may also affect legitimate users or applications1

References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 32-33…

The design phase of a BIA must begin with identifying critical business functions, since they determine:

Which systems/processes need protection

Recovery priorities

Acceptable downtime (RTO/MTD)

Without clearly defining what's critical, the BIA cannot guide resource allocation or continuity strategies effectively.

“A successful BIA must begin with identifying which business functions are critical to achieving organizational objectives.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery, Section: BIA Methodology*

 Performing a risk assessment is the best approach to determine how to protect newly acquired data assets prior to integration, as it will help to identify the threats, vulnerabilities, impacts, and likelihoods of the data assets, and to prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options. Including security requirements in the contract is a good practice, but it may not be sufficient to address the specific risks of the data assets. Assessing security controls and reviewing data architecture are also important steps, but they should be done after performing a risk assessment, as they will depend on the risk level and the risk app

The best approach to determine how to protect newly acquired data assets prior to integration is to perform a risk assessment. A risk assessment will identify the various threats and vulnerabilities associated with the data assets and help the organization develop an appropriate security strategy. This risk assessment should include an assessment of the security controls in place to protect the data, a review of the data architecture, and a review of any contractual requirements related to security.

According to the CISM Manual, the information security manager should first assess the risk to business operations before taking any other action. This will help to prioritize the issues and determine the appropriate response. Performing a vulnerability assessment, a gap analysis, or creating a security exception are possible actions, but they should be based on the risk assessment results. References = CISM Manual, 5th Edition, page 1211; CISM Practice Quiz, question 32

The factor that has the greatest influence on the successful integration of information security within the business is organizational structure and culture because they determine how information security is organized, governed, and supported within the organization, and how information security roles and responsibilities are defined, assigned, and communicated across different levels and functions. Risk tolerance and organizational objectives are not very influential because they do not affect how information security is integrated within the business, but rather what information security aims to achieve or protect. The desired state of the organization is not very influential because it does not affect how information security is integrated within the business, but rather what the organization aspires to be or do. Information security personnel are not very influential because they do not affect how information security is integrated within the business, but rather who performs information security tasks or activities. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives

The most important information to communicate with regard to the open items from the risk register to senior management is the potential business impact of these risks. The potential business impact is the estimated consequence or loss that the organization may suffer if the risk materializes or occurs. The potential business impact can be expressed in quantitative or qualitative terms, such as financial, operational, reputational, legal, or strategic impact. Communicating the potential business impact of the open items from the risk register helps senior management to understand the severity and urgency of these risks, and to prioritize the risk response actions and resources accordingly. Communicating the potential business impact also helps senior management to align the risk management objectives and activities with the business objectives and strategies, and to ensure that the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization are respected and maintained.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 831; CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Reporting, page 1012.

The information security manager’s best course of action is to report the findings of the risk assessment to the key stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, and regulators. This will ensure that the stakeholders are aware of the potential impact of the risk and can make informed decisions on how to address it. The other options are possible actions to take after reporting the findings, but they are not the best course of action in this scenario.

References = CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update] (section: Information Risk Response) and CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA (page 6, item example 2)

The primary outcome of a BIA is the identification of critical business functions and prioritization of recovery efforts (D). CISM defines the BIA as the foundation for continuity and resilience planning, providing insight into impact, recovery priorities, and tolerable downtime. The other options represent secondary or unrelated benefits.

Performing a vulnerability analysis is the best option to ensure that a new application complies with information security policy because it helps to identify and evaluate any security flaws or weaknesses in the application that may expose it to potential threats or attacks, and provide recommendations or solutions to mitigate them. Reviewing the security of the application before implementation is not a good option because it may not detect or prevent all security issues that may arise after implementation or deployment. Integrating security functionality at the development stage is not a good option because it may not account for all security requirements or challenges of the application or its environment. Periodically auditing the security of the application is not a good option because it may not address any security issues that may occur between audits or after deployment. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/secure-software-development-lifecycle https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/integrating-assurance-functions

Employee accountability is the degree to which employees are responsible for their actions and outcomes related to information security. It reflects the extent to which employees understand their roles and responsibilities, follow the policies and procedures, report incidents and breaches, and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. Embedding security responsibilities into job descriptions helps to clarify the expectations and obligations of employees, as well as the consequences of non-compliance or negligence. It also helps to align the security objectives with the business goals and strategies, and to foster a culture of security awareness and responsibility.

The CISO should first determine the extent of the impact to the organization by assessing the nature and scope of the data breach, the type and sensitivity of the data involved, the potential harm to the organization and its customers, and the legal and contractual obligations of the organization and the service provider. This will help the CISO to prioritize the appropriate actions and resources to respond to the incident and mitigate the risks. The other options are possible actions that the CISO may take after determining the impact, depending on the circumstances and the outcomes of the investigation. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2231; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1030

Stakeholder requirements are the most important to include in an information security strategy, as they reflect the business needs, objectives, and expectations of the organization and its key stakeholders. Stakeholder requirements also help to align the information security strategy with the enterprise governance and the organizational culture. Risk register, industry benchmarks, and regulatory requirements are important inputs for the information security strategy, but they are not the most important to include.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 321; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.12

The development phase is the stage of the system development life cycle (SDLC) where the system requirements, design, architecture, and implementation are performed. The development phase is most challenging to implement security controls because it involves complex and dynamic processes that may not be well understood or documented. Security controls are essential for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its data, as well as for complying with regulatory and contractual obligations. However, security controls may also introduce additional costs, risks, and constraints to the development process, such as:

Increased complexity and overhead of testing, verification, validation, and maintenance

Reduced flexibility and agility of changing requirements or design

Increased dependency on external vendors or third parties for security services or products

Increased vulnerability to errors, defects, or vulnerabilities in the code or configuration

Increased difficulty in measuring and reporting on security performance or effectiveness

Therefore, implementing security controls in the development phase requires careful planning, coordination, communication, and collaboration among all stakeholders involved in the SDLC. It also requires a clear understanding of the security objectives, scope, criteria, standards, policies, procedures, roles, responsibilities, and resources for the system. Moreover, it requires a proactive approach to identifying and mitigating potential threats or risks that may affect the security of the system.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

If participation in security awareness training is decreasing while incidents are rising, making the training program mandatory for all employees is the best course of action. The CISM Review Manual notes that mandatory training ensures organizational-wide coverage and directly addresses the lack of participation, which is likely contributing to increased incidents.

The greatest benefit of information asset classification is providing a basis for imple-menting a need-to-know policy. Information asset classification is a process of catego-rizing information based on its level of sensitivity and importance, and applying appro-priate security controls based on the level of risk associated with that information1. A need-to-know policy is a principle that states that access to information should be granted only to those individuals who require it to perform their official duties or tasks2. The purpose of a need-to-know policy is to limit the exposure of sensitive information to unauthorized or unnecessary parties, and to reduce the risk of data breaches, leaks, or misuse. Information asset classification provides a basis for implementing a need-to-know policy by:

•Defining the value and protection requirements of different types of information

•Labeling the information with the appropriate classification level, such as public, internal, confidential, secret, or top secret

•Establishing the roles and responsibilities of information owners, custodians, and users

•Enforcing access controls and encryption for the information

•Documenting the security policies and procedures for the information

By providing a basis for implementing a need-to-know policy, information asset classi-fication can help organizations to protect their sensitive information, comply with rele-vant laws and regulations, and achieve their business objectives. The other options are not the greatest benefits of information asset classification. Helping to determine the recovery point objective (RPO) is not a benefit, but rather a consequence of applying security controls based on the classification level. RPO is the acceptable amount of data loss in case of a disruption3. Supporting segregation of duties is not a benefit, but rather a prerequisite for implementing a need-to-know policy. Segregation of duties is a principle that states that no single individual should have control over two or more phases of a business process or transaction that are susceptible to errors or fraud4. De-fining resource ownership is not a benefit, but rather a component of information asset classification. Resource ownership is the assignment of accountability and authority for an information asset to an individual or a group5. References: 1: Information Classifi-cation - Advisera 2: Need-to-Know Principle - NIST 3: Recovery Point Objective - NIST 4: Segregation of Duties - NIST 5: Resource Ownership - NIST : Information Classification in Information Security - GeeksforGeeks : Information Asset Classification Policy - UCI